Crosswalk of Research Questions, Individual Survey Items and Survey Topics, by Study Area |
||||||
TOPIC 1: IDENTIFICATION |
||||||
Survey Topics |
Extant Data |
State Part B Administrator Surveys |
State 619 Coordinators |
State Part C Coordinators |
District Part B Administrators |
|
1. How do rates of identification of children for early intervention or special education vary according to the different disability definitions used by states? |
||||||
Identification rates for early intervention |
Child Count files for Part C and Part B from IDEADATA.ORG
ED Facts
NECTAC Notes 21 |
|
|
|
|
|
Identification rates for special education |
Child Count files for Part B from IDEADATA.ORG
ED Facts
NECTAC Notes 24
NASDSE summary of Part B
SEA websites |
12, 13 |
16, 17, 18 |
|
|
|
Referrals to special education |
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
Newly identified students |
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
2. How does each state determine, under IDEA 2004, significant disproportionalities by race and ethnicity in the identification of students for special education for the districts within the state, and to what extent have districts been so identified? |
||||||
Significant disproportionality definitions and procedures |
Part B Annual Performance Review, Indicators 9 & 10 |
1, 2, 3,4 |
|
|
|
3. Which early intervening and/or Response to Intervention (RtI) strategies do districts use at various grade levels prior to the identification of children for special education? |
|||||
Early Intervening policies and procedures, strategies and supports |
|
5,6, 7 |
|
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 |
Response to Intervention policies and procedures, strategies and supports |
|
8,9, 10, 11 |
19, 20 |
|
9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, |
4a. How do rates of identification for special education vary according to the use of different early intervening or RtI strategies? (Analysis question) |
|||||
4b. How do rates of identification for special education vary according to whether districts are required to adopt Early Intervening Services because of significant disproportionalities? (Analysis question) |
Crosswalk of Research Questions, Individuals Survey Items and Survey Topics, by Study Area |
||||||
TOPIC 2: PART C IMPLEMENTATION |
||||||
Survey Topics |
Extant Data |
State Part B Administrator Surveys |
State 619 Coordinators |
State Part C Coordinators |
District Part B Administrators |
|
5. Across states, what are the different models of service delivery for the Part C program supported through IDEA, and of coordination among the various early intervention and special education services provided through Part C and Part B? |
||||||
Part C models of service delivery |
|
|
|
1, 2, 3, 7, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 |
|
|
Finance/Funding |
|
|
|
19, 20, 21, 22, 23 |
|
|
Service Coordination Models |
|
|
|
8, 9, 10 |
|
|
Transition |
|
|
14, 15 |
33 |
|
|
Eligibility |
Part C Update (2007, p 37)
NECTAC summary |
|
|
24, 25 |
|
|
Part B/Part C Coordination |
Part C Annual Performance Review, Indicator 8
Part B Annual Performance Review, Indicator 12 |
|
1,2,3, 4,5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 |
4, 5, 6, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 |
|
Crosswalk of Research Questions, Individuals Survey Items and Survey Topics, by Study Area |
||||||
TOPIC 3: ACADEMIC STANDARDS AND PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS1 |
||||||
Survey Topics |
Extant Data |
State Part B Administrator Surveys |
State 619 Coordinators |
State Part C Coordinators |
District Part B Administrators |
|
6. Do state or district policies explicitly reference state academic standards, and do these policies require that goals and objectives on IEPs reference those standards? |
||||||
Policies on IEP/IFSP requirements regarding academic/developmental standards |
SEA websites |
22, 23, 24,25,26, 27, 28 |
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 |
34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 |
|
Policies regarding use of accommodations |
SEA websites |
29, 30 |
|
|
41, 42, 43 |
|
7. What are states and districts doing in terms of certification, professional development, and compensation for special education teachers to promote compliance with the “highly qualified teacher” provisions of IDEA and No Child Left Behind? |
||||||
Highly qualified personnel definitions for teachers
|
SEA websites
Education Commission of the States (2006)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qualified personnel definitions for early intervention providers |
SEA websites
|
|
|
|
|
|
Policies, procedures, strategies and supports for meeting HQ requirements and personnel needs |
Schools and Staffing Survey, Various items from both the public school and public school teacher surveys
Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS), program type and award level
Center to Inform Personnel Preparation Policy and Practice in Early Identification and Preschool Education |
14, 15, 16, 17, 18 |
29, 30, 31, 32 |
43, 44, 45, 46, 47 |
44, 45, 46, 51, 52 |
|
Numbers of qualified special education and early intervention personnel |
ED Facts |
|
|
|
47, 48, 49, 50 |
|
8. How do the efforts of states and districts to provide a sufficient number of qualified early intervention and special education personnel for children with disabilities vary with state definitions of “highly qualified teacher” under NCLB? (Analysis question) |
Crosswalk of Research Questions, Individuals Survey Items and Survey Topics, by Study Area |
|||||
TOPIC 4: DISPUTE RESOLUTION AND MEDIATION |
|||||
Survey Topics |
Extant Data |
State Part B Administrator Surveys |
State 619 Coordinators |
State Part C Coordinators |
District Part B Administrators |
9. Over time, have there been changes in the incidence of disputes between early intervention personnel and parents/guardians on issues related to identification for early intervention? |
|||||
Incidence rates of disputes |
|
|
|
53, 55, 56, 57, 60, 62 |
|
Topics of disputes |
|
|
|
54, 58, 61, 63 |
|
10. How does the incidence of disputes between early intervention or education personnel and parents/guardians regarding identification for early intervention vary with the use of mediation by states and districts? (Partly an analysis question) |
|||||
Use of various dispute resolution procedures |
|
|
|
52, 53, 55, 56, 57, 59, 60, 62 |
|
Use of mediation |
|
|
|
53, 55 |
|
11. Over time, have there been changes in the incidence of disputes between special education personnel and parents/guardians on issues related to special education services? |
|||||
Incidence rates of disputes |
SLIIDEA state, Items 17, 18, 21, 22, 25, 27
SLIIDEA district, Items 28 |
31, 32, 34, 35, 36, 37, 39, 40, 42 |
37, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43, 46, 48, 50 |
|
54, 55, 58, 60 |
Topics of disputes |
SLIIDEA state, Items 26, 28
SLIIDEA district, Item 29 |
33, 38, 41, 43 |
39, 44, 47, 49 |
|
56, 57, 59, 62 |
12. How does the incidence of disputes between special education personnel and parents/guardians regarding special education services vary with the use of mediation by states and districts? (Partly an analysis question) |
|||||
Use of various dispute resolution procedures |
|
31, 32, 34, 35, 36, 37, 39, 40, 42 |
36, 37, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43, 45, 46, 48 |
|
53. 54, 55, 58, 60,61 |
Use of mediation |
|
31, 32, 33, 34, 37 |
37, 38, 39, 40, 43 |
|
54, 55, 58, 60, 61 |
Crosswalk of Research Questions, Individuals Survey Items and Survey Topics, by Study Area |
|||||
CONTEXTUAL INFORMATION |
|||||
Survey Topics |
Extant Data |
State Part B Administrator Surveys |
State 619 Coordinators |
State Part C Coordinators |
District Part B Administrators |
Demographic information
|
CCD Data, Region, Size, Urbanicity, Enrollment, Special Education Enrollment, Race/Ethnicity, FRPL percentages
ED Facts |
|
|
|
|
Parent/Family Involvement activities |
Part D funded Parent Information Centers |
19, 20, 21 |
33, 34, 35 |
48, 49, 50, 51 |
32, 33, 34 |
1 This is really now two topics, alignment with NCLB, and personnel, which overlap.
File Type | application/msword |
File Title | Crosswalk of Research Questions, Individual Survey Items and Survey Topics, by Study Area |
Author | OReillyF |
Last Modified By | doritha.ross |
File Modified | 2008-09-18 |
File Created | 2008-09-18 |