Evaluation of the
Professional Learning Resources of the REL NW Toolkit for Using
Technology to Support Postsecondary Student Learning
New
collection (Request for a new OMB Control Number)
No
Regular
09/29/2023
Requested
Previously Approved
36 Months From Approved
13,177
0
1,280
0
0
0
The current authorization for the
Regional Educational Laboratories (REL) program is under the
Education Sciences Reform Act of 2002, Part D, Section 174, (20
U.S.C. 9564), administered by the Department of Education,
Institute of Education Sciences (IES), National Center for
Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE). The central
mission and primary function of the RELs is to support applied
research and provide technical assistance to state and local
education agencies within their region (ESRA, Part D, section
174[f]). The REL program's goal is to partner with educators and
policymakers to conduct work that is change-oriented and supports
meaningful local, regional, or state decisions about education
policies, programs, and practices to improve outcomes for students.
The Regional Educational Laboratory Northwest is developing a
toolkit based on the Using Technology to Support Postsecondary
Student Learning What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) Practice Guide to
support student learning in community college contexts. Community
college instructors, across all disciplines, including those who
teach in person, hybrid (remote and in person), and online courses,
are the primary audience for the Toolkit. This toolkit's efficacy
evaluation will collect information about the professional learning
resources, organized as the eAcademy: Professional Learning for
Using Technology to Enhance Learning, that will comprise the main
component of the Toolkit. In the efficacy study, the eAcademy will
be offered to instructors in community colleges in Oregon. The
evaluation of the eAcademy includes two parts: first, using a
random assignment design, researchers will examine the impact of
the eAcademy on instructor knowledge, teaching practices, and
student outcomes. Second, researchers will collect implementation
data to understand fidelity of implementation, treatment contrast,
and how the eAcademy influences instructor and student outcomes.
The research questions include: What is the impact of the eAcademy
on instructors' awareness of technology tools for learning,
knowledge of how to use technology for learning, and comfort using
education technologies to support student learning, what is the
impact of the eAcademy on instructors' use of technology to support
student learning, and what is the impact of the eAcademy on student
engagement, interaction, course completion, and persistence to the
next quarter? The goals of the program evaluation include
documenting the content of eAcademy (topics covered and activities
provided), the way the eAcademy is implemented, and the treatment
dosage to understand fidelity of implementation. The evaluation
study will provide further insight into how the eAcademy is related
to instructor- and student-level outcomes, and the implementation
study will document treatment contrast between the eAcademy and
other available professional resources. eAcademy participation data
will be used to affirm whether instructors in the treatment group
accessed the professional resources and instructors in the control
group did not. Findings from the implementation study may be used
to improve future iterations of the eAcademy and to update the WWC
Practice Guide recommendations. They may also generate ideas for
new approaches to professional development that lead to better
outcomes.
This is a new data collection.
Therefore, all burden is new. This results in a program change
increase in burden and responses of 1,280 hours and 13,177
responses.
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Heidi Gansen 202 245-6765
heidi.gansen@ed.gov
No
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.