REL Pacific Efficacy and
Implementation Evaluation of the Secondary Writing Toolkit
New
collection (Request for a new OMB Control Number)
No
Regular
07/31/2023
Requested
Previously Approved
36 Months From Approved
1,705
0
416
0
0
0
The current authorization for the
Regional Educational Laboratories (REL) program is under the
Education Sciences Reform Act of 2002, Part D, Section 174, (20
U.S.C. 9564), administered by the Department of Education,
Institute of Education Sciences (IES), National Center for
Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE). The central
mission and primary function of the RELs is to support applied
research and provide technical assistance to state and local
education agencies within their region (ESRA, Part D, section
174[f]). The REL program's goal is to partner with educators and
policymakers to conduct work that is change-oriented and supports
meaningful local, regional, or state decisions about education
policies, programs, and practices to improve outcomes for students.
Literacy, including writing, is closely tied to student success
throughout K-12 education, which impacts high school graduation
(National Institute for Literacy, 2008; NCES, 2020) and ultimately,
income beyond graduation (US Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2019).
Despite the importance of writing to life and learning, teachers
report that the training they receive on teaching writing, both
prior to entering the field and while teaching, is minimal or
insufficient (Graham, 2019). To address this problem, the REL PA
toolkit development team is developing a Secondary Writing Toolkit
to support teachers in implementing Hawai‘i evidence-based
instructional strategies to improve writing among students in
grades 6-8. The toolkit is based on the Teaching Secondary Students
to Write Effectively WWC Practice Guide and is being developed in
collaboration with district and school partners in Hawai‘i. REL
Pacific will design the Toolkit to help teachers improve their
writing instruction so that students in Hawai‘i become stronger,
more effective writers. The Toolkit uses Professional Learning
Communities (PLCs) facilitated by one of the teachers in the school
(peer facilitator) to help teachers learn new instructional skills.
Teachers also have access to instructional resources as part of the
Toolkit to support their use of evidence-based strategies in their
classrooms. This study is designed to measure the efficacy and
implementation of the REL Pacific-developed toolkit designed to
improve writing among students in grades 6-8. The toolkit
evaluation team plans to conduct an independent evaluation using a
school-level, cluster randomized controlled trial design to assess
the efficacy of the school-based professional learning resources
included in the toolkit. The evaluation will also assess how
teachers and facilitators implement the toolkit to provide context
for the efficacy findings and guidance to improve the toolkit and
its future use. The evaluation will take place in 40 schools in
Hawai‘i and focus on all students in grades 6-8. The toolkit
evaluation will produce a report for district and school leaders
who are considering strategies to improve writing among secondary
students. The report will provide guidance on using the Toolkit
professional development and resources to help teachers implement
the Practice Guide (PG) recommendations.
US Code:
20
USC 9564 Name of Law: Education Sciences Reform Act (ESRA) of
2002, Part D, Section 174
This is a new data collection,
therefore all burden is new. This results in an program change
increase in burden and responses of 416 hours and 1,705
responses.
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.