Exhibit C-5 Regional Educational Laboratory Director Interview Protocol
Notes for reviewers: This interview protocol will be administered to Regional Educational Laboratory (REL) Directors in each of the 10 RELs. Each interview will take up to 30 minutes and will focus on details of projects the Centers conducted, services provided, capacity developed, and collaborations with other Centers and RELs. Interviewers will ask the questions in an open-ended manner, and note-takers will code responses into pre-specified categories to the extent possible.
Blue font indicates the mapping to research questions.
Green font indicates where interview questions are informed by ASPs or survey results.
Purple font indicates instructions to the interviewer.
Red font indicates skip patterns / programming notes.
Blue boxes are instructions or transitions that the interviewer will read to respondents.
Radio buttons indicate only one answer should be selected.
Checkboxes indicate the interviewer should check all that apply.
Collaboration Successes and ChallengesWe would like to discuss the experiences you’ve had with the Comprehensive Center program since the most recent cycle began in 2019. |
RQ4.3 To what extent, and in what ways, do Comprehensive Centers collaborate with the RELs? In what areas do Comprehensive Center and REL activities overlap with each other, if at all?
Has the joint needs sensing helped you avoid duplication of effort or resulted in collaboration?
Reduced duplication of effort
Increased collaboration
Other: _____________________________
Has not been successful
Has your REL collaborated with Centers beyond the joint needs sensing work to co-develop presentations, co-develop resources or tools, or provide joint service delivery?
Co-develop presentations (such as webinars, expert panels, or events)
Co-develop resources or tools
Joint service delivery
Other: _____________________________
RQ4.3 To what extent, and in what ways, do Comprehensive Centers collaborate with the RELs? In what areas do Comprehensive Center and REL activities overlap with each other, if at all?
Are there some types of Center services that would benefit from more collaboration between your REL and the Centers?
No (GO TO Q4)
Yes
Which services would benefit the most from such collaboration?
Conduct a needs assessment
Develop a logic model
Select evidence-based practices (EBPs), interventions, or state-wide efforts
Plan implementation of EBPs, interventions, or state-wide efforts
Support implementation of EBPs, interventions, or state-wide efforts
Evaluate results
Other: ______________________
RQ4.3 To what extent, and in what ways, do Comprehensive Centers collaborate with the RELs? In what areas do Comprehensive Center and REL activities overlap with each other, if at all?
What challenges do you experience in collaborating with the Centers?
Center is part of a competitor organization
Overlap / duplication of services
Work with different stakeholders or offices
Insufficient resources / time to collaborate
Misalignment of priorities
Other: ____________________________
None
RQ4.1 What are the perceived benefits and challenges of changes to the structure of the Comprehensive Center program?
Did your REL collaborate with the Comprehensive Centers between 2012 and 2019?
No (GO TO closing statement)
Yes
Were you involved in this collaboration?
No (GO TO closing statement)
Yes
RQ4.3 To what extent, and in what ways, do Comprehensive Centers collaborate with the RELs? In what areas do Comprehensive Center and REL activities overlap with each other, if at all? ASP field 112 Other Partners
Has collaboration between Centers and RELs changed since the last cycle?
No change
Increased
Decreased
In what ways?
More coordination and information sharing
More co-planning of projects
More jointly provided services, such as needs assessments or logic models
More co-development of tools or resources, webinars, expert panels, or events
More co-facilitation of webinars, expert panels, or events
Less coordination and information sharing
Less co-planning of projects
Less jointly provided services, such as needs assessments or logic models
Less co-development of tools or resources, webinars, expert panels, or events
Less co-facilitation of webinars, expert panels, or events
Other: _____________________________
Can you think of new ways for the RELs and Centers to improve the quality or efficiency of their collaborative efforts?
More resources for collaborative efforts
Greater collaboration with the NC / RCs outside of REL’s region
Increase co-planning of projects
Co-develop more tools or resources
Co-develop more webinars, expert panels, or events
Co-facilitate more webinars, expert panels, or events
Jointly provided services, such as needs assessments or logic models
Other: _____________________________
What are the challenges remaining in collaboration between RELs and Centers?
Reduced access to in-depth content expertise
Too many meetings
Duplication of effort
Logistics / scheduling difficulties
Lack of clarity regarding roles and responsibilities
Other: _____________________________
Closing StatementThank you so much for providing all this information. We really enjoyed learning more about your Comprehensive Center and appreciate your time! If any documents were mentioned that we need to gather: Earlier you mentioned [documents], which would be helpful for me to have to better understand your Center. What would be the easiest way for me to access these documents? |
Abt Associates Inc. Appendix C: Primary Data Collection Instruments ▌pg. C-43
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
Author | Abrams, Andrew |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 2022-02-21 |