Download:
pdf |
pdf
APPENDIX D
5. CENTER STAFF SURVEY
Thank you for taking the time to complete this survey. We are conducting this survey in order to
gather information from multiple Comprehensive Centers about the successes and challenges of
building constituent capacity and providing technical assistance. All the information you provide
will be reported as aggregate or grouped data and will only be used for the purposes of this study.
The focus of this survey is on technical assistance in two areas identified by the Department of
Education as priorities:
1. Identifying, recruiting, developing, and retaining highly effective teachers and leaders
2. Ensuring school readiness and success of preschool‐age children and their successful
transition to kindergarten.
We are interested in your responses as someone who provides technical assistance to state
departments of education (SEAs) or to Regional Comprehensive Centers. However, there may be
some questions on the survey that you feel do not apply to you. Please feel free to indicate that
on those questions by selecting “don’t know.” Because we are surveying several people from
each Center, those questions will likely be answered by your colleagues.
The survey should take 20 minutes to complete.
Information collected for this study comes under the confidentiality and data protection
requirements of the Institute of Education Sciences (The Education Sciences Reform Act of
2002, Title I, Part E, Section 183). Responses to this data collection will be used only for
research purposes. The reports prepared for this study from the survey findings will
be summarized and aggregated and should not associate responses with a specific district,
school, or individual. However, respondents’ roles and the CC they work with may be identified
in the report, which may lead to individuals’ being identified. Other than this situation that we
have made respondents aware of, we will not provide information that identifies you to anyone
outside the study team, except as required by law.
This survey is voluntary. You can decide not to participate, or you can discontinue participation
at any time without consequence. You do not have to answer any questions you do not want
to, but we encourage you to answer as many as you can.
If you have any questions, please contact Michaela Gulemetova at 443‐367‐0088 extension
2335 or NCCEvaluation@impaqint.com.
Thank you for your help!
IMPAQ International, LLC
5. Center Staff Survey
The OMB Control Number for this information collection is and the expiration date is .
According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, persons are not required to respond to this collection of
information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number and expiration date. Responding to this
survey is voluntary. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 20 minutes
per response. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of
information to XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX at XXXXXXXXXXXXX@ed.gov.
IMPAQ International, LLC
5. Center Staff Survey
2
[Note: The following questions will be asked for each verified project in each Center’s workplan that
addresses one of the two selected federal priority areas. Each Center’s survey will draw upon a
customized project list compiled from its current work plan and other information sources.]
1. Are you a member of the project team or do you work on this project in any capacity?
⃝ Yes [Display questions 2‐6 below for this project]
⃝ No [Go on to next project]
2. What is your role on the project? (select all that apply)
Project lead/project manager
State liaison/state manager
Consultant
Content expert
Data analyst
Meeting planner or facilitator
Professional development provider
Quality assurance reviewer
Evaluator
Other
3. Which of these factors have been the most significant challenges in this project? Select up to
three.
[Allow only 3 selections]
a. Turnover in chief state school officer and/or other SEA leadership
b. Turnover among state education agency (SEA) staff
c. Turnover among Center staff
d. Changing priorities at an SEA
e. Mismatch between stated SEA needs and Center federal priorities
f. Difficulty establishing relationships with an SEA
g. Policy shifts in a state government
h. Cuts in SEA staffing/budgets
i. Meeting diverse needs across SEAs (and/or regions)
j. Lack of communication within an SEA
k. Lack of Center financial resources
IMPAQ International, LLC
5. Center Staff Survey
3
l. Lack of access to appropriate expertise
m. Other
If you indicated an “Other” challenge please describe the challenge
4. Which of these have been most significant in supporting success in this project? Select up to
three.
[Allow only 3 selections]
a. Content expertise among Center staff
b. Knowledge of state context among Center staff
c. Expertise among SEA staff
d. Supportive leadership in Center
e. SEA Leadership commitment to the project
f. Strong relationships between Center staff and SEA leadership
g. Strong relationships between Center staff and SEA staff
h. Collaboration with Content Comprehensive Center
i. Collaboration with Regional Comprehensive Center
j. Collaboration with a Regional Education Laboratory
k. Collaborate with an institution of higher education
l. Collaboration with a government agency
m. Collaboration with a professional association (e.g., ASCD, CCSSO)
n. Collaboration with a subcontractor
o. Other
If you indicated an “Other” supporting factor, please describe it:
IMPAQ International, LLC
5. Center Staff Survey
4
5. Who are your collaborators on this project? (specific Comprehensive Centers, Regional Education
Laboratories, institutions of higher education, etc.)
6. To what extent is this project succeeding (or has succeeded) in building the capacity of your
constituents (SEA staff or other participants)?
⃝ To a great extent
⃝ To a moderate extent
⃝ To some extent
⃝ Not at all
Please explain your response:
{GO TO next project and ask questions 1‐6, until all projects have appeared. Then ask the following
question once.}
7. Of all these projects, which one do you think would be the most suitable for a project profile (an in‐
depth description of a project), in that it is high‐leverage (is likely to lead to extensive capacity
building) and long‐term (longer than one year)? In what ways is it likely to be high‐leverage?
IMPAQ International, LLC
5. Center Staff Survey
5
| File Type | application/pdf |
| File Modified | 2014-12-18 |
| File Created | 2014-12-12 |