Form 1 Survey

Fellowship Review Survey - Reviewers

Page 1 of 4

OMB Control Number: 0925-0474 Expiration Date 10/31/2014
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 10 minutes per
response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering
and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. An
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. Send comments regarding
this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions
for reducing this burden, to: NIH, Project Clearance Branch, 6705 Rockledge Drive, MSC 7974,
Bethesda, MD 20892-7974, ATTN: PRA (0925-0476). Do not return the completed form to this
address.

Fellowship Review Survey - Reviewers
Information you provide will be treated as confidential and reported only
in a form that does not personally identify you.
1. What was the format of the most recent fellowship review
meeting you participated in?








Traditional face-to-face








Teleconference with pre-meeting IAM component








Telepresence (TPM)








Other

2. Other than the willingness to contribute to peer review of
fellowship applications, which of the factors below influenced
your decision to participate in the fellowship meeting (check
all that apply)







Travel burden







Opportunity to interact and socialize with colleagues







Interest in trying new formats and platforms for fellowship review







None of the above







Other (please explain)

3. Did the format of review, e.g. face to face, telepresence
etc., have any effect on your ability to review the
applications?

file:///S:/CSRDIR/_Office%20of%20Planning,%20Analysis%20and%20Evaluation/Survey...

3/6/2012

Fellowship Review Survey - Reviewers








It had no effect on my ability to review applications








It enhanced my ability to review applications








It adversely affected my ability to review application

Page 2 of 4

4. In your opinion, did the format of review, e.g. face to
face, telepresence etc., have any effect on the ability of
the panel to review applications?







It had no effect on the panel's ability to review
applications.








It enhanced the panel's ability to review applications








It adversely affected the panel's ability to review
applications

5. In your opinion, did the format of review have any effect
on your perception of review outcome (appropriate review
of all applications)?







It had no effect on review outcome








It had a positive effect on review outcome








It had a negative effect on review outcome

6. Would the format have any effect on your willingness to
participate in a future meeting?








The meeting format itself would not affect my decision to
participate again








More likely to participate again








Less likely to participate again

7. What NIH review formats have you participated in prior
to this meeting (check all that apply).







Traditional face-to-face







Teleconference







Internet Assisted Meeting (IAM, formerly Asynchronous

file:///S:/CSRDIR/_Office%20of%20Planning,%20Analysis%20and%20Evaluation/Survey...

3/6/2012

Fellowship Review Survey - Reviewers

Page 3 of 4

Electronic Discussion)







Video Assisted Meeting (VAM, formerly Video Enhanced
Discussion)







Telepresence (TPM)







None, this fellowship meeting was my first NIH review
experience.

8. Additional comments about the meeting format?




Thank you for your responses, please click on 'finish' to complete the
survey.

file:///S:/CSRDIR/_Office%20of%20Planning,%20Analysis%20and%20Evaluation/Survey...

3/6/2012

Fellowship Review Survey - Reviewers

Finish

Page 4 of 4

Save

file:///S:/CSRDIR/_Office%20of%20Planning,%20Analysis%20and%20Evaluation/Survey...

3/6/2012