Appendix 3. Intervention Provider Survey for the Evaluation of Response to Intervention Practices
for Elementary School Reading
What is the purpose of this study?
This study is part of the congressionally-mandated national evaluation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA, Public Law 108-446) and will address the following questions:
What are the effects on academic achievement of providing intensive reading interventions to elementary school children who have been identified as at risk for reading difficulties compared with children just above the cut point for providing intervention?
How do academic outcomes, including reading achievement and special education identification, vary with elementary schools' adoption of Response to Intervention practices for early grade reading?
How do Response to Intervention practices for early grade reading vary across schools?
How is the study team defining Response to Intervention?
Response to Intervention (RtI) is a multi-step approach to providing early and more intensive intervention and monitoring within the general education setting.
In principle, RtI begins with research-based instruction and behavioral support provided to students in the general education classroom, followed by screening of all students to identify those who may need systematic progress monitoring, intervention, or support. Students who are not responding to the general education curriculum and instruction are provided with increasingly intense interventions through a "tiered" system, and they are frequently monitored to assess their progress and inform the choice of future interventions, including possibly special education for students determined to have a disability.
IDEA permits some federal special education funds to be used for "early intervening services" such as RtI, and also permit districts to use RtI to inform decisions regarding a child's eligibility for special education.
Who is administering this study?
This study is being supported by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) at the U. S. Department of Education as authorized by the U. S. Congress under Section 664 of IDEA. MDRC, SRI International, and RG Research Group developed plans for the study under contract ED-04-CO-0111/0003 with IES, and Survey Research Management is administering the teacher survey.
What is the purpose of this survey?
This survey seeks information to describe reading intervention services, sometimes called Tier 2 or Level 2 interventions and Tier 3 or Level 3 interventions.
Reading intervention can be in one or more areas of reading (that is, phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, reading comprehension) and refers to targeted or intensive reading intervention for students.
Reading interventions are provided to students somewhat below grade level benchmarks (sometimes called Tier 2 or Level 2 students) or far below grade level benchmarks (sometimes called Tier 3 or Level 3 students), including students with disabilities.
Reading interventions may occur in addition to core reading instruction and employ print materials used by an instructor and student, or electronic computer based materials used primarily by the student.
Who should complete this survey?
Answer the three questions below to help you determine if you should complete this survey.
Do you teach small groups of students in grades 1, 2, or 3?
Yes No
Are some of these groups of students somewhat below or far below grade level reading benchmarks?
Yes No
Do you provide reading intervention services to these small groups?
Yes No
If you answered yes to all three questions above, please proceed. If you answered no to any question, then you do not need to continue this survey.
Will the information provided through this survey be kept confidential?
All information gathered for this study will be kept confidential and will only be used for research purposes. The information collected about schools and students for this study will be used only for statistical purposes and may not be disclosed or used, in identifiable form, for any other purpose except as required by law (Public Law 107-279, Section 183).
What are the instructions for this survey?
Please answer the questions based on your experiences. There are no expected answers, so please be thoughtful and honest as you respond. Your participation is important and appreciated, and confidential.
The survey is broken into two short sections:
A. Practices Used with Reading Intervention Groups
B. Professional Background and Experience
THANK YOU IN ADVANCE FOR COMPLETING THIS SURVEY!
According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to this voluntary collection of information unless such collection displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 1850-New. The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average 30 minutes per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data resources, gather the data needed, and complete and review the information collection. If you have any comments concerning the accuracy of the time estimate(s) or suggestions for improving this form, please write to: U.S. Department of Education, Washington, D.C. 20202-4537. If you have comments or concerns regarding the status of your individual submission of this form, write directly to: Jonathan Jacobson, U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, 555 New Jersey Avenue, NW, Suite 500J, Washington, D.C. 20208, or email jonathan.jacobson@ed.gov.
SECTION A: PRACTICES USED WITH READING INTERVENTION GROUPS
Questions A1 through A15 ask about various intervention groups. Intervention group refers to students who have been identified for targeted or intensive small group reading interventions because they are somewhat below or far below grade level benchmarks.
An intervention group should be regularly scheduled to meet with you before, during or after the school day for several weeks, months, school year. The intervention group should continue to meet until a decision is made to change the composition of the group or to change the child’s instruction, but would not be considered small group reading instruction that typically occurs during class-wide reading instruction.
For each regularly scheduled intervention group you worked with during the most recent full school week, please answer each question in the table below to describe how you teach and organize their reading intervention.
If you worked with more than three groups, please copy pages 2-5 and provide this information for each group with students in grades 1, 2, or 3.
|
Group #1 |
Group #2 |
Group #3 |
A1. What time of day does the instruction occur? MARK ONE. |
|
|
|
A2. In what location does the instruction occur? MARK ALL THAT APPLY. |
|
|
|
A3. What is the grade level of students in the group? MARK ALL THAT APPLY. |
K
1
2
3 |
K
1
2
3 |
K
1
2
3 |
A4. At what time during the day is the group scheduled for intervention? MARK ALL THAT APPLY. |
|
|
|
A5. What is the reading level of the students? MARK ALL THAT APPLY. |
|
|
|
A6. How many times during the week, do you meet with this group? MARK ONE. |
1 2
3 4
5 |
1 2
3 4
5 |
1 2
3 4
5 |
A7. During your last typical meeting with this group, how many minutes of reading instruction did you provide? MARK ONE. |
|
|
|
A8. How many students were assigned to the group ? MARK ONE. |
1 2
3 4 |
1 2
3 4 |
1 2
3
4 |
A9. How many of the students in the group have an IEP ? MARK ONE. |
0 1
2 3
4 |
0 1
2 3
4 |
0 1
2 3
4 |
A10. How many students in the group were Limited English Proficient or English Language Learners? MARK ONE. |
0 1
2 3
4 |
0 1
2 3
4 |
0 1
2 3
4 |
A11. What components of reading were emphasized for this group? MARK ALL THAT APPLY. |
|
|
|
A12. What reading programs and/or reading series were used with this group? MARK ALL THAT APPLY. |
|
|
|
A13. Are any of the reading interventions primarily delivered by a computerized instructional system? |
|
|
|
A14. How many weeks ago did you last measure the performance of students in this group? |
Never This week 1 week 2 weeks 3 weeks 4 weeks 5 weeks 6 weeks More than 6 weeks |
Never This week 1 week 2 weeks 3 weeks 4 weeks 5 weeks 6 weeks More than 6 weeks |
Never This week 1 week 2 weeks 3 weeks 4 weeks 5 weeks 6 weeks More than 6 weeks |
A15. Under what circumstances would the decision be made to move a student to another group during the school year? MARK ALL THAT APPLY. |
|
|
|
Questions A16 through A17 ask about what typically occurs for most small groups of students in each tier you teach.
A16a. Typically, how is progress monitoring data used for students somewhat below grade level benchmark in reading, sometimes called Tier 2 or Level 2 students? MARK ALL THAT APPLY.
To determine if instruction should be changed
To determine if student’s group placement should be changed
To determine if special education pre-referral process is appropriate
To determine if special education referral process is appropriate
Not applicable
A16b. Typically, how is progress monitoring data used for students far below grade level benchmark in reading, sometimes called Tier 3 or Level 3 students? MARK ALL THAT APPLY.
To determine if instruction should be changed
To determine if student’s group placement should be changed
To determine if special education pre-referral process is appropriate
To determine if special education referral process is appropriate
Not applicable
A17a. In a typical month, for students in Tier 2 or Level 2, approximately how often do you measure student progress, using any of the following types of reading outcome and skill measures?
Times per month…
Oral reading fluency 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 or more
Curriculum-embedded test 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 or more
Phonics 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 or more
Word lists 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 or more
Running records 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 or more
Phonemic awareness 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 or more
Other (please specify: _______________) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 or more
Other (please specify: _______________) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 or more
A17b. In a typical month, for students in Tier 3 or Level 3 approximately how often do you measure student progress, using any of the following types of reading outcome and skill measures?
Times per month…
Oral reading fluency 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 or more
Curriculum-embedded test 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 or more
Phonics 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 or more
Word lists 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 or more
Running records 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 or more
Phonemic awareness 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 or more
Other (please specify: _______________) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 or more
Other (please specify: _______________) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 or more
A18. Do you meet with a school level (or grade level) team--for example, school psychologist, speech language pathologist, reading specialist, etc.--that evaluates the progress of struggling readers and makes decisions about reading interventions?
Yes No (skip to question B1)
A19. At the last typical school-level (or grade-level) meeting, who attended this meeting in addition to yourself? MARK ALL THAT APPLY.
Reading specialist
Reading interventionist
Reading coach
Special education teacher
ELL or ESL teacher
General education teacher(s)
Social Worker/Guidance counselor
School psychologist
Speech language pathologist
School administrator
Paraprofessional or instructional assistant
Staff from the district office
Other adult not
listed here
(please specify: _________________)
A20. How frequently does this school-level (or grade-level) team meet ? MARK ONE.
More often than once per week
Once per week
Once every 2 weeks
Once every 3 weeks
Once every 4 weeks
Once every 5 weeks
Once every 6 weeks
Once every 7 weeks
Once every 8 weeks
Once every 9 weeks
Once every 10 weeks
Once every 11 weeks
Once every 12 weeks
Less often than every 12 weeks
A21. How are reading data usually used during school-level team, sometimes grade level, meetings? MARK ALL THAT APPLY.
To determine if individual students are making satisfactory/adequate progress
To identify individual students who need a reading intervention
To determine if adjustments are needed in the core reading instruction/curriculum
To determine if individual students should be moved to a different reading group
To determine if individual students should be moved to a different classroom for reading
To determine if individual struggling readers need a change in their instruction
To decide if any individual students should be referred for special education
Other (please specify: _________________)
SECTION B: PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND AND EXPERIENCE
Questions B1 through B7 ask about your professional background and experience.
B1. What is your title in the school?
Reading
intervention/specialist
Special Educator
Classroom Teacher
Speech Language Pathologist
Paraprofessional
ELL Teacher
Other (specify _____________)
B2. Including the current year, how many years have you been an educator?
|
Enter # of years below… |
|
____ # Years |
|
____ # Years |
|
____ # Years |
B3. What is the highest educational degree that you hold ? MARK ONE.
High School
Associate’s
Bachelor's
Master's
Doctorate or Professional Degree
B4. Which of the following describes the teaching certificate/endorsement you currently hold ? MARK ONE.
Regular or standard state certificate or advanced professional certificate
Probationary certificate (issued after satisfying all requirements except the completion of a probationary period)
Provisional or other type of certificate given to persons who are still participating in an alternative certification program
Temporary certificate (requires some additional college coursework, student teaching and/or passage of a test before regular certification can be obtained)
Waiver or emergency certificate (issued to persons with insufficient teacher preparation who must complete a regular certification in order to continue teaching)
I do not have any of the above certifications
B5. Please indicate which educational areas you hold state certification or licensure in, and what grade span (for example, K-6) this certification or licensure is for MARK ALL THAT APPLY..
|
Area of Certification/Endorsement |
Grade Span |
|
I do not hold certification/endorsement |
|
|
Elementary Education |
________ |
|
Early Childhood Education |
________ |
|
Secondary Education |
________ |
|
Special Education |
________ |
|
Arts/Music |
________ |
|
English Language Arts |
________ |
|
ESOL/Bilingual/ESL Education |
________ |
|
Reading |
________ |
|
Foreign Languages |
________ |
|
Mathematics |
________ |
|
Computer Science |
________ |
|
Natural Sciences |
________ |
|
Social Sciences |
________ |
|
Other (please specify: ________________) |
________ |
B6. During the last 12 months, including the summer, in how many of each of the following types of professional development activities in reading have you participated? Please count each activity only once. What is the total number of hours you spent in these activities?
First write in the number of activities of each type in which you have been engaged over the last 12 months.
Then, write the total number of hours you spent in these activities. Mark 0 if you participated in none.
|
Enter below the # of |
|
|
Times over the last 12 months |
Total Hours over the last 12 months |
a. Attended
short, stand-alone training or workshop in reading |
# ____ |
# ____ |
b. Attended a
longer institute or workshop in reading |
# ____ |
# ____ |
c. Attended a college course in reading (include any courses you are currently attending) |
# ____ |
# ____ |
d. Attended a conference about reading (might include multiple short offerings) |
# ____ |
# ____ |
e. Received coaching related to reading instruction |
# ____ |
# ____ |
f. Received mentoring related to reading instruction |
# ____ |
# ____ |
g. Acted as a coach related to reading instruction |
# ____ |
# ____ |
h. Acted as a formal mentor related to reading instruction |
# ____ |
# ____ |
i. Participated in a professional learning community (PLC) |
# ____ |
# ____ |
j. Other (e.g. participated in a teacher study group, network, or collaboration supporting professional development in reading, participated in committee or task force related to reading, visited or observed reading instruction in other schools) |
# ____ |
# ____ |
B7. During the last 12 months, how much of an emphasis did these topics receive in the professional development activities that you attended. MARK ONE RESPONSE ON EACH ROW.
|
Did not occur |
Occurred Moderate emphasis |
Occurred Major emphasis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 2021-01-31 |