Pilot test results summary

NAEP 2013 Pilot Test Summary of Resuts_20120326.doc

National Assessment of Education Progress (NAEP) 2011-13 System Clearance

Pilot test results summary

OMB: 1850-0790

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf

Introduction

This report describes the performance of the items previously pilot tested that are being suggested for operational use in the student core questionnaire for 2013. Note that in the 2012 pilot, the grades 8 and 12 student core items were given as part of two assessments (reading and mathematics). Therefore, data are presented separately from the two pilot administrations.



Income/Wealth (Pilot Items): Other Household Resources

In order to achieve a more discriminating socioeconomic status (SES) measure, the NAEP SES expert panel made recommendations that led to development of a new item of household resources that may be associated with SES. These additional items focus on the size of the student’s home and the family’s possession of labor-saving devices that are more common among higher income than lower income families. Question 24 on the 2009 Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) student questionnaire asked students to report on home possessions (summing over 17 items including three different book types: poetry, school work aids, and reference/manuals). There is a long history of evidence of academic achievement correlated with SES when using home possessions as a measure of income/wealth in an SES composite (Cuff 1934).

Grade 4, 8, 12 - Pilot

VE592166

Do you have the following items at your home? Fill in ovals for all that apply.

A Access to the Internet

B Clothes dryer just for your family

C Dishwasher

D More than one bathroom

E Your own bedroom


Grade 4


Item Statistics

Response Options

G4 Writing Pilot 2012

Pct

Access to the Internet

76

No response

24

Clothes dryer just for your family

76

No response

24

Dishwasher

71

No response

29

More than one bathroom

69

No response

31

Your own bedroom

68

No response

32

Non-responses

0



Grade 8


Item Statistics

Item Statistics

Response Options

G8 Mathematics Pilot 2012

G8 Reading Pilot 2012

Pct

Pct

Access to the Internet

88

87

No response

12

13

Clothes dryer just for your family

83

84

No response

17

16

Dishwasher

70

68

No response

30

32

More than one bathroom

73

73

No response

27

27

Your own bedroom

72

71

No response

28

29

Non-responses

0

0


Grade 12


Item Statistics

Item Statistics

Response Options

G12 Mathematics Pilot 2012

G12 Reading Pilot 2012

Pct

Pct

Access to the Internet

95

93

No response

5

7

Clothes dryer just for your family

92

90

No response

8

10

Dishwasher

78

76

No response

22

24

More than one bathroom

82

82

No response

18

18

Your own bedroom

82

80

No response

18

20

Non-responses

0

0


Analysis

  • Quality and Performance: data on missing rates and response patterns did not reveal any item quality problems.

    • Pilot response patterns and missing rates for the other household resources item did not suggest any within-grade item quality problems. However, across grade analysis reveals unexpected differences. For example: Access to the Internet (Math: 4/8/12): 76% / 87% / 95% and Clothes dryer just for your family (Math: 4/8/12): 76% / 84% / 92%. That said, there are several competing explanations that are unexplainable with the data we have:

      • Older children may be part of families that have more children, which might warrant greater access to the Internet (for educational and entertainment purposes) as well as greater need for a clothes dryer.

      • Older children may be part of families that have older parents and older parents may have greater income and wealth, which would allow for disposable income to purchase additional home possessions such as Internet or a clothes dryer.

      • Younger students may be unaware of access to certain home possessions and because this is a “select all that apply” item, there is no way to distinguish those who didn’t select the response option because “I don’t know” is not an option here or because the answer is “No.”

    • Rationale for inclusion: Household resources item under consideration by NAEP SES expert panel for potential SES composite variable and/or proxy for family income/wealth.

    • Post-analysis revision:

      • Remove the word “items” from the question stem so that it reads “Do you have the following in your home?” [Previous version created challenge with Spanish translation. Reviewers and translators determined the inclusion of the word “item” in the sentence was unnecessary.]




Income/Wealth (Pilot Items): Household Composition

The NAEP SES expert panel suggested including measures of household composition in NAEP as a measure of SES based partly on the dilution model which posits that, given the finite parental resources, as the number of children in the family increases, the resources accrued by any one child necessarily decline (Downey 2001). A negative relationship between family size and children’s academic-related achievement has been demonstrated in many studies (Blake 1981; Greenberg 1985; Hanushek 1992; Hauser and Sewell 1986; Hill and O' Neill 1997; Sputa and Paulson 1995). In general, these studies found that children from larger families have lower academic performance than children from smaller families.


The SES panel also noted that family structure or whether there are one or two parents in the household will have an opposite effect in that two parents provide more supporting resources than one. Compared to children living in homes with both biological parents, peers living in single-mother or step-father families were more likely to have ever been suspended or expelled from school; more likely to have engaged in delinquent activities; more likely to have problems getting along with their teachers, doing homework, and paying attention in school; and more likely to have lower grade point averages (Manning & Lamb 2003). Children from single-parent or stepparent families often report that their parents had lower educational expectations for them, compared to reports from children in families with both biological parents. These parents are less likely to monitor their children’s schoolwork and provide less overall supervision on children’s social activities, compared to reports from children in families with both biological parents (Astone & McLanahan 1991). On average, compared to peers raised in blended or single-parent families, students from families with both biological parents completed more years of schooling and were also more likely to graduate from high school and, attend college (Ginther & Pollak 2004).


Grade 4, 8, 12 - Pilot

VE592165

Do the following people live in your home? Fill in ovals for all that apply.

A Mother

B Stepmother

C Foster mother

D Other female legal guardian

E Father

F Stepfather

G Foster father

H Other male legal guardian



Grade 4


Item Statistics

Response Options

G4 Writing Pilot 2012

Pct

Mother

91

No response

9

Stepmother

4

No response

96

Foster mother

1

No response

99

Other female legal guardian

11

No response

89

Father

69

No response

31

Stepfather

10

No response

90

Foster father

1

No response

99

Other male legal guardian

10

No response

90

Non-responses

0


Grade 8


Item Statistics

Item Statistics

Response Options

G8 Mathematics Pilot 2012

G8 Reading Pilot 2012

Pct

Pct

Mother

89

88

No response

11

12

Stepmother

6

4

No response

94

96

Foster mother

1

1

No response

99

99

Other female legal guardian

11

12

No response

89

88

Father

62

59

No response

38

41

Stepfather

14

13

No response

86

87

Foster father

1

1

No response

99

99

Other male legal guardian

8

9

No response

92

91

Non-responses

0

0


Grade 12


Item Statistics

Item Statistics

Response Options

G12 Mathematics Pilot 2012

G12 Reading Pilot 2012

Pct

Pct

Mother

90

88

No response

10

12

Stepmother

4

4

No response

96

96

Foster mother

0

0

No response

100

100

Other female legal guardian

5

5

No response

95

95

Father

63

64

No response

37

36

Stepfather

13

12

No response

87

88

Foster father

0

0

No response

100

100

Other male legal guardian

3

4

No response

97

96

Non-responses

0

0


Analysis

  • Quality and Performance:

    • One percent (or less) students reported having foster parents. On NDE, when reported by states, there will be some cases where less than 62 respondents will be in the cell and in those cases NDE will place a flag noting that estimates cannot be reported for students in that category.

  • Rationale for inclusion: Item under consideration by SES panel for potential SES composite variable.

  • Post-analysis revision:

    • Merge response choices: Foster mother and other female legal guardian

    • Merge response choices: Foster father and other male legal guardian

Post High School Preparation

Research has shown that educational aspirations are associated with high-school academic performance (Dumais 2002; Goldsmith 2004; Lee and Bryk 1988; Lynch 2000). Nonetheless, the Governing Board was dissatisfied with the item quality of past NAEP measures of students’ plans after college. Research has often shown that the reason for these misaligned ambitions is preparation (Schneider and Stevenson 1999). While students are very ambitious and have high aspirations, the better predictor of their academic achievement is receiving information, strategies, and mentoring (from parents and others) to help them think about and prepare for careers and postsecondary education (Schneider and Stevenson 1999, McDonough 1997; Ream and Rumberger 2008; Sokatch 2006; Wimberly & Noeth 2004). The following pilot item was developed based on the aforementioned cited research showing a connection between mentoring, aligned ambitions, post-high school preparation and student achievement.


Grade 12 - Pilot

VE627773

During this school year, which of the following have you done? Fill in ovals for all that apply.

A Taken the SAT or ACT College Entrance Exams

B Submitted the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA)

C Applied to a 2-year college

D Been accepted to a 2-year college

E Applied to a 4-year college

F Been accepted to a 4-year college

G Applied to a technical training program (such as electrician,
beautician, mechanic, computer programmer, etc.)

H Been accepted to a technical training program

I Talked with a military recruiter

J Been accepted into the military

K Applied for a full-time job

L Been interviewed for a full-time job

M None of the above


Grade 12


Item Statistics

Item Statistics

Response Options

G12 Mathematics Pilot 2012

G12 Reading Pilot 2012

Pct

Pct

Taken the SAT or ACT College Entrance Exams

61

66

No response

39

34

Submitted the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA)

33

34

No response

67

66

Applied to a 2-year college

20

18

No response

80

82

Been accepted to a 2-year college

8

9

No response

92

91

Applied to a 4-year college

56

60

No response

44

40

Been accepted to a 4-year college

40

45

No response

60

55

Applied to a technical training program (such as electrician, beautician, mechanic, computer programmer, etc.)

4

4

No response

96

96

Been accepted to a technical training program

2

3

No response

98

97

Talked with a military recruiter

16

15

No response

84

85

Been accepted into the military

2

2

No response

98

98

Applied for a full-time job

9

8

No response

91

92

Been interviewed for a full-time job

5

5

No response

95

95

None of the above

12

8

No response

88

92

Non-responses

0

0


Analysis

  • Quality and Performance: Pilot response patterns and missing rates for this item did not suggest any within-grade or across-grade item quality problems.

  • Rationale for inclusion:

    • Item replaces previous G12 items related to post HS aspirations, which were requested for removal by NAGB in 2010. New item measures behavior, which is expected to be a more valid predictor of average scale scores and reflection of post high school preparation.


NAEP Pilot Information for New Operational Items – 2013 Wave 1 Page 9

File Typeapplication/msword
AuthorDonnell Butler
Last Modified ByDonnell Butler
File Modified2012-03-26
File Created2012-03-26

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy