Teacher Quality Distribution Study

Forms and Documents

Document Name	Status
TQD Study - Response to OMB Comments v3.docx Supplementary Document	2011-08-05
TQD Study - Response To OMB Comments Part 2 Aug 1.docx Supplementary Document	2011-08-05
Att_TQD 1850-NEw 4484 p comment response LANEA Response5 24 11.docx Supplementary Document	2011-06-14
Att_1850-NEW 4484 rev LAAtt_Appendix A - District Notification Letter - 6-9-11.docx Supplementary Document	2011-06-14
Att_LATQD_Part_A_6 9 11.docx Supporting Statement A	2011-08-05
Att_1850 NEW Appendix F - Confidentiality Pledge.docx Supplementary Document	2011-03-31
Att_1850-NEW 4484 LATQD_Part_B_6 9 11.docx Supporting Statement B	2011-08-05

IC Document Collections

IC ID	Document Title	Status
196320	Teacher personnel Data - Rounds 2-4 Other-personnel data	New
196319	Teacher Personnel Data - Round 1 Other-personnel data	New
196318	Student Records Data Round 2-4 Other-data request memo	New
196317	Student Record Data - Round 1 Other-data request memo	New
196316	Phone Interview Other-interview protocol	New
196315	Recruitment - phone and site visit Other-conversation guide	New

ICR Details

OMB Control No: 1850-0886	ICR Reference No: 201102-1850-003
Status: Historical Active	Previous ICR Reference No:
Agency/Subagency: ED/IES	Agency Tracking No: 4484
Title: Teacher Quality Distribution Study
Type of Information Collection: New collection (Request for a new OMB Control Number)	Common Form ICR:  No
Type of Review Request: Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action: Approved with change	Conclusion Date: 08/05/2011
	Date Received in OIRA: 04/14/2011
Terms of Clearance:

	Inventory as of this Action	Requested	Previously Approved
Expiration Date	08/31/2014	36 Months From Approved
Responses	213	0	0
Time Burden (Hours)	1,377	0	0
Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0

---

Abstract: Title II, Part A, the Improving Teacher State Formula Grants program is the primary federal funding under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act to support a high quality teacher in every classroom. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) supports reform in four key areas including increasing teacher effectiveness and promoting the equitable distribution of effective teachers. Therefore, this study describes the distribution of teacher quality within districts over time and any changes in that distribution associated with district strategies to promote an equitable distribution of high quality teachers. This study will provide information over time about the distribution of teacher quality and will document district efforts to promote teacher equity within a select number of districts. The research questions are: • What is the distribution of teacher quality across schools within districts? • What strategies and policies are districts promoting to address inequitable distribution of teacher quality? How are these strategies/policies enacted (e.g. strategy determination, goals and objectives, theory of action, features, administration, necessary resources, challenges to administration, intended duration)? • What is the relationship between the district policies/strategies and the distribution of teacher quality? The study will be conducted in up to 30 geographically-dispersed school districts. The study will document the distribution of teacher quality, within participating districts, using teacher value-added analyses. The study will also describe changes in the distribution of teacher quality across the outcomes years 2010-2011 through 2012-2013. Data collection will include student achievement obtained from administrative records, annual semi-structured district leadership interviews about district strategies and policies to address inequitable distribution of teacher quality, and district administrative records/personnel data.

---

Authorizing Statute(s): US Code: 20 USC 6621-6623,Sections 2121-2123 Name of Law: Elementary and Secondary Education Act
  

Citations for New Statutory Requirements: None

---

Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:	Stage of Rulemaking:	Federal Register Citation:	Date:
	Not associated with rulemaking

---

Federal Register Notices & Comments
60-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	76 FR 3119	01/19/2011
30-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	76 FR 20636	04/13/2011
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR? No

---

Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR: 6

IC Title	Form No.	Form Name
Recruitment - phone and site visit
Teacher Personnel Data - Round 1
Student Record Data - Round 1
Teacher personnel Data - Rounds 2-4
Phone Interview
Student Records Data Round 2-4

---

ICR Summary of Burden

	Total Approved	Previously Approved	Change Due to New Statute	Change Due to Agency Discretion	Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate	Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses	213	0	0	213	0	0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)	1,377	0	0	1,377	0	0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0	0	0	0

Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: Yes

Burden Increase Due to: Miscellaneous Actions

Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Reduction Due to:

Short Statement: This is a new collection.

---

Annual Cost to Federal Government: $1,590,379

Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods? Yes Part B of Supporting Statement

Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002? No

Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]? No

Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]? No

Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)? No

Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response? Uncollected

---

Common Form ICR:  No

---

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

(c) It reduces burden on small entities;

(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;

(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:

(i) Why the information is being collected;

(ii) Use of information;

(iii) Burden estimate;

(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);

(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and

(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.

(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and

(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.

Certification Date: 04/14/2011

---