60-day Federal Register Notice

lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1

12176

Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 49 / Friday, March 14, 2025 / Notices

under specified circumstances.
Specifically, National Strategic Research
Institute at the University of Nebraska,
Omaha, NE; Rapid Offset Technologies
LLC, Toano, VA; 3DFortify Inc.,
Charlestown, MA; DRS Training &
Control Systems, LLC, Fort Walton
Beach, FL; C–3 Comm Systems, LLC,
Arlington, VA; University of Utah, Salt
Lake City, UT; Whitespace Innovations,
Huntsville, AL; Pacific Antenna
Systems LLC., Camarillo, CA; The
University of Southern Mississippi,
Hattiesburg, MS; 10x National Security,
Aldie, VA; Omni Fed LLC, Gainesville,
VA; Rysavy Research LLC, Hood River,
OR; C3 AI, Redwood City, CA; Fuse
Integrations, San Diego, CA; Ozni AI,
Colorado Springs, CO; VectorWave
Corporation, Waltham, MA; MMB
Solutions, Ridgeville, SC; Future
Technologies Innovations, LLC,
Suwanee, GA; Two Six Labs LLC,
Arlington, VA; GPD Optoelectronics
Corp., Salem, NH; Abside Networks,
Inc., Acton, MA; Haigh-Farr, Inc.,
Bedford, NH; and Defense Operations &
Execution Solutions, Inc., W.
Melbourne, FL, have been added as
parties to this venture.
Also, 1901 Group LLC, Reston, VA;
Aarna Networks, Inc., San Jose, CA;
Advanced Ground Information Systems,
Inc., Jupiter, FL; Aether Argus, Inc.,
Atlanta, GA; Altagrove LLC, Herndon,
VA; Anokiwave, Inc., Billerica, MA;
Appliedinfo Partners, Inc., Somerset, NJ;
ARD Global LLC, Vienna, VA; Athena
Technologies LLC, Orlando, FL;
Augmntr, Inc., Berthoud, CO; Aurora
Insight, Inc., Denver, CO; AVATAR
Partners, Inc., Irvine, CA; Blacksky
Geospatial Solutions, Inc., Herndon,
VA; BridgeComm, Inc., Denver, CO;
Brigham Young University, Provo, UT;
CGI Federal, Inc., Fairfax, VA; Clarity
Cyber LLC, Linthicum, MD; Cobalt
Solutions, Inc., Austin, TX; Cobham
Advanced Electronic Solutions, Exeter,
NH; Corning Specialty Materials, Keene,
NH; Cyberspace Solutions LLC,
Herndon, VA; DTC Communications,
Inc., Herndon, VA; Dynetics, Inc.,
Huntsville, AL; Echo Ridge LLC,
Sterling, VA; Epsilon Systems
Solutions, Inc., San Diego, CA; Erebus
Solutions, Inc., Rochester, NY; Exium,
Inc., Allen, TX; Futures Action Network
LLC, New York, NY; G3 Technologies,
Inc., Columbia, MD; GPS Source, Inc.,
Colorado Springs, CO; Herrick
Technology Laboratories, Inc.,
Germantown, MD; Hewlett Packard
Enterprise Company, Reston, VA;
Honeywell International, Inc.,
Clearwater, FL; Huckworthy LLC, Cape
Charles, VA; iCallidus, Inc., Columbia,
MD; Intelsat General Communications

VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:09 Mar 13, 2025

Jkt 265001

LLC, McLean, VA; Intuitive Research
and Technology Corp., Huntsville, AL;
Iron Bow Technologies LLC, Herndon,
VA; IT Consulting Partners LLC,
Chagrin Falls, OH; Jacobs Technology,
Inc., Tullahoma, TN; JACS Solutions,
Inc., Linthicum Heights, MD; JEM
Engineering LLC, Laurel, MD; Key
Bridge Wireless LLC, McLean, VA;
Kumu Networks, Sunnyvale, CA; Kyrus
Tech, Inc., Sterling, VA; Leonardo
Electronics, Inc., Arlington, VA;
LinQuest Corp., Los Angeles, CA;
Metamagnetics, Inc., Westborough, MA;
National Instruments Corp., Austin, TX;
Naval Systems, Inc., Lexington Park,
MD; NEC Corp. of America, Irving, TX;
NetScout Systems, Inc., Westford, MA;
NeuComm Solutions LLC, Aurora, CO;
NineTwelve Institute, Indianapolis, IN;
Northeast UAS Airspace Integration
Research Alliance, Inc., Syracuse, NY;
Oceanit Laboratories, Inc., Honolulu, HI;
Omnispace LLC, McLean, VA; OST,
Inc., McLean, VA; Pacific Star
Communications, Inc., Portland, OR;
Pareto Frontier LLC, Westford, MA;
Parry Labs LLC, Columbia, MD;
PathFinder Digital LLC, Sanford, FL;
Pathfinder Wireless Corp., Seattle, WA;
Performance Defense LLC, Phoenix, AZ;
Photonic Systems, Inc., Billerica, MA;
Polaris Alpha Advanced Systems, Inc.,
Fredericksburg, VA; Power
Fingerprinting, Inc., Vienna, VA; Qorvo
Texas LLC, Richardson, TX; Quantum
Xchange, Inc., Bethesda, MD; Rampart
Communications, Inc., Hanover, MD;
RDA Technical Services, Inc., Ft. Myers,
FL; Rebel Space Technologies, Inc.,
Long Beach, CA; Rebellion Defense,
Inc., Washington, DC; Rice University,
Houston, TX; Robotic Research LLC,
Clarksburg, MD; RT Logic, Colorado
Springs, CO; Saab, Inc., East Syracuse,
NY; Scalable Network Technologies,
Inc., Culver City, CA; Science
Applications International Corp.,
Reston, VA; SecureG, Inc., Herndon,
VA; Shipcom Federal Solutions LLC,
Belcamp, MD; Simba Chain, Inc.,
Plymouth, IN; Sol Firm LLC, Mount
Pleasant, SC; Southern Methodist
University, Dallas, TX; SRI
International, Menlo Park, CA; Stevens
Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ;
Telesto Group LLC, McLean, VA; Terry
Consultants, Inc., Annandale, VA; TLC
Solutions, Inc., Saint Augustine, FL;
Tyto Athene LLC, Herndon, VA;
University of California, Irvine, Irvine,
CA; University of Mississippi,
University, MS; University of Virginia,
Charlottesville, VA; Viavi Solutions,
Inc., Germantown, MD; Vision Products
LLC, Campbell, CA; VMware, Inc., Palo
Alto, CA; Vorbeck Materials Corp.,
Jessup, MD; WaveLink, Inc., Huntsville,

PO 00000

Frm 00054

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

AL; XCOM Labs, Inc., San Diego, CA;
Zoic Labs LLC, Culver City, CA;
Veritech LLC, Aberdeen, MD; University
of Southern California, Marina del Rey,
CA; Shift5, Inc., Arlington, VA; Radius
Method LLC, Boca Raton, FL; and
Electro Magnetic Applications, Inc.,
Lakewood, CO, have withdrawn as
parties to this venture.
No other changes have been made in
either the membership or planned
activity of the group research project.
Membership in this group research
project remains open, and NSC intends
to file additional written notifications
disclosing all changes in membership.
On September 23, 2014, NSC filed its
original notification pursuant to section
6(a) of the Act. The Department of
Justice published a notice in the Federal
Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the
Act on November 4, 2014 (79 FR 65424).
The last notification was filed with
the Department on April 3, 2024. A
notice was published in the Federal
Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the
Act on June 28, 2024 (89 FR 54046).
Suzanne Morris,
Deputy Director Civil Enforcement
Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2025–04068 Filed 3–13–25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[OMB Number 1125–0012]

Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comments Requested; Extension of a
Previously Approved Collection;
Request for New Recognition, Renewal
of Recognition, Extension of
Recognition of a Non-Profit Religious,
Charitable, Social Service, or Similar
Organization (Form EOIR–31)
Executive Office for
Immigration Review, Department of
Justice.
ACTION: 60-Day notice.
AGENCY:

The Executive Office for
Immigration Review (EOIR), Department
of Justice (DOJ), will be submitting the
following information collection request
to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Comments are encouraged and
will be accepted for 60 days until May
13, 2025.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have additional comments
especially on the estimated public
burden or associated response time,
suggestions, or need a copy of the
SUMMARY:

E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM

14MRN1

12177

Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 49 / Friday, March 14, 2025 / Notices
proposed information collection
instrument with instructions or
additional information, please contact
Laeticia Mukala-Nirere, Attorney
Advisor, Office of the General Counsel,
Executive Office for Immigration
Review, 5107 Leesburg Pike, Suite 2600,
Falls Church, VA 22041, telephone:
(703) 305–0470, EOIR.PRA.Comments@
usdoj.gov or Kabina.L.Mukala-Nirere@
usdoj.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written
comments and suggestions from the
public and affected agencies concerning
the proposed collection of information
are encouraged. Your comments should
address one or more of the following
four points:
—Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of EOIR, including whether
the information will have practical
utility;
—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
—Evaluate whether and if so how the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected can be
enhanced; and
—Minimize the burden of the collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms
of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Abstract: Regulations prescribe who
may represent individuals in
immigration proceedings. The Assistant
Director for Policy (or the Assistant
Director for Policy’s delegate), in the
exercise of discretion, may accord
recognition to organizations to practice
before EOIR and the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS). See 8 CFR
1292.11, 1292.13(a). To be eligible for
initial recognition, an organization

must: (1) establish that it is a non-profit
religious, charitable, social service, or
similar organization; (2) demonstrate
that it provides immigration legal
services primarily to low-income and
indigent clients within the United
States; (3) demonstrate the
organization’s currently valid federal
tax-exempt status or pending
application for federal tax-exempt
status; (4) apply simultaneously to have
at least one employee or volunteer
approved as an Accredited
Representative (using Form EOIR–31A);
(5) demonstrate access to adequate
knowledge, information, and experience
in immigration law and procedure; and
(6) designate at least one authorized
officer to act on the organization’s
behalf. 8 CFR 1292.11(a), (d). The
organization applies for recognition by
submitting a Form EOIR–31 to the
Assistant Director for Policy (or the
Assistant Director for Policy’s delegate)
along with proof that they have served
a copy of Form EOIR–31 on the U.S.
Citizenship and Immigration Services
(USCIS) offices in the jurisdictions
where the organization offers or intends
to offer immigration legal services. See
8 CFR 1292.13(a).
Overview of This Information
Collection
1. Type of Information Collection:
Renewal with change of a currently
approved collection. EOIR has made
non-substantive changes to the current
Form EOIR–31. These changes include
revisions to the form’s Privacy Act
notice; addition of the expiration date
for OMB approval on the form; updates
to the address to which applications can
be submitted; and addition of an
alternative method by which
applications can be submitted.
2. The Title of the Form/Collection:
Request for New Recognition, Renewal
of Recognition, Extension of
Recognition of a Non-profit Religious,
Charitable, Social Service, or Similar
Organization.
3. The agency form number, if any,
and the applicable component of the

Department sponsoring the collection:
the form number is EOIR–31, and the
sponsoring component is Executive
Office for Immigration Review, United
States Department of Justice.
4. Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract: Primary: Non-profit
organizations seeking initial
recognition, renewal of recognition, or
extension of recognition to be
recognized as legal service providers by
the Office of Legal Access Programs of
the Executive Office for Immigration
Review (EOIR). Other: None. Abstract:
This information collection will allow
an organization to request and renew
recognition of the organization to appear
before EOIR and/or the Department of
Homeland Security, or to extend
recognition from a designated office to
its other locations. This information
collection is necessary to determine
whether an organization meets the
eligibility requirements for recognition
pursuant to 8 U.S.C. 1103, 1229a, 1362
and 8 CFR 1292.11–19. Requests can be
made using a fillable .pdf application or
electronic submission.
5. An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond: It is estimated that 210
respondents will complete the form
annually for initial recognition with an
average of 2 hours per response. It is
estimated that 90 respondents will
complete the form annually for renewal
of recognition with an average of 7
hours per response. It is estimated that
20 respondents will complete the form
annually for standalone extension office
requests with an average of 2 hours per
response.
6. An estimate of the total annual
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: The estimated annual burden
hours associated with this collection is
1,055 hours.
7. An estimate of the total annual cost
burden associated with the collection, if
applicable:

TOTAL BURDEN HOURS—INITIAL RECOGNITION
Number of
respondents

lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1

Activity

Frequency
(annually)

Time per
response
(hours)

Total annual
responses

Total annual
burden
(hours)

Title ......................................................................................

210

1

210

2

420

Unduplicated Totals ......................................................

........................

........................

........................

........................

........................

VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:09 Mar 13, 2025

Jkt 265001

PO 00000

Frm 00055

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM

14MRN1

12178

Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 49 / Friday, March 14, 2025 / Notices
TOTAL BURDEN HOURS—RENEWAL OF RECOGNITION
Number of
respondents

Activity

Frequency
(annually)

Time per
response
(hours)

Total annual
responses

Total annual
burden
(hours)

Title ......................................................................................

90

1

90

7

630

Unduplicated Totals ......................................................

........................

........................

........................

........................

........................

TOTAL BURDEN HOURS—STANDALONE EXTENSION OFFICE REQUESTS
Number of
respondents

Activity

Time per
response
(hours)

Total annual
responses

Total annual
burden
(hours)

Title ......................................................................................

20

1

20

2

40

Unduplicated Totals ......................................................

........................

........................

........................

........................

........................

If additional information is required
contact: Darwin Arceo, Department
Clearance Officer, United States
Department of Justice, Justice
Management Division, Policy and
Planning Staff, Two Constitution
Square, 145 N Street NE, 4W–218,
Washington, DC.
Dated: March 11, 2025.
Darwin Arceo,
Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S.
Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2025–04127 Filed 3–13–25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–30–P

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[OMB Number 1125–0013]

Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comments Requested; Extension of a
Previously Approved Collection;
Request by Organization for
Accreditation or Renewal of
Accreditation of Non-Attorney
Representative (Form EOIR–31A)
Executive Office for
Immigration Review, Department of
Justice.
ACTION: 60-Day notice.
AGENCY:

The Executive Office for
Immigration Review (EOIR), Department
of Justice (DOJ), will be submitting the
following information collection request
to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Comments are encouraged and
will be accepted for 60 days until May
13, 2025.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have additional comments
especially on the estimated public
burden or associated response time,
SUMMARY:

lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1

Frequency
(annually)

VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:09 Mar 13, 2025

Jkt 265001

suggestions, or need a copy of the
proposed information collection
instrument with instructions or
additional information, please contact
Laeticia Mukala-Nirere, Attorney
Advisor, Office of the General Counsel,
Executive Office for Immigration
Review, 5107 Leesburg Pike, Suite 2600,
Falls Church, VA 22041, telephone:
(703) 305–0470, EOIR.PRA.Comments@
usdoj.gov or Kabina.L.Mukala-Nirere@
usdoj.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written
comments and suggestions from the
public and affected agencies concerning
the proposed collection of information
are encouraged. Your comments should
address one or more of the following
four points:
—Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of EOIR, including whether
the information will have practical
utility;
—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
—Evaluate whether and if so how the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected can be
enhanced; and
—Minimize the burden of the collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms
of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Abstract: Regulations prescribe who
may represent individuals in
immigration proceedings. The Assistant
Director for Policy (or the Assistant
Director for Policy’s delegate), in the

PO 00000

Frm 00056

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

exercise of discretion, may accord
recognition to organizations, which are
then able to seek full or partial
accreditation of their representative(s) to
practice before EOIR and the
Department of Homeland Security
(DHS). See 8 CFR 1292.12, 1292.13(a).
For this to occur, the Assistant Director
for Policy (or the Assistant Director for
Policy’s delegate) must first approve a
request for recognition from an eligible
organization. Then, the Assistant
Director for Policy (or the Assistant
Director for Policy’s delegate) must
approve a request from a recognized
organization for accreditation of its
representative(s). An individual who
receives full accreditation may represent
aliens before EOIR and DHS; an
individual who receives partial
accreditation may represent aliens
before DHS only. 8 CFR 1292.12(a).
Overview of This Information
Collection
1. Type of Information Collection:
Renewal with change of a currently
approved collection. EOIR has made
non-substantive changes to the current
Form EOIR–31A. These changes include
revisions to the form’s Privacy Act
notice; addition of the expiration date
for OMB approval on the form; updates
to the address to which applications can
be submitted; and addition of an
alternative method by which
applications can be submitted.
2. The Title of the Form/Collection:
Request by Organization for
Accreditation or Renewal Accreditation
of Non-Attorney Representative.
3. The agency form number, if any,
and the applicable component of the
Department sponsoring the collection:
the form number is EOIR–31A, and the
sponsoring component is Executive
Office for Immigration Review, United
States Department of Justice.

E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM

14MRN1