| Table 1: Updated Burden Estimation for Revised ICR | |||||
| Grant Program | Average Number of Respondents per Year over ICR Period | Average Annual Temporal Cost for Participants over ICR Period (2025-2027) (hrs) | Average Annual Cost for Participants over ICR Period (2025-2027) (hrs) | Total Hours Over ICR Period | Total Cost Over ICR Period |
| DERA Grant Program (National, Tribal, and State) | 623 | 4,588 | $283,138 | 13,763 | $849,413 |
| Clean School Bus Grant Program | 267 | 2,580 | $148,366 | 7,741 | $445,097 |
| Clean Heavy-Duty Vehicles Grant Program | 70 | 526 | $33,145 | 1,578 | $99,435 |
| Clean Ports Program Grant Program | 55 | 455 | $28,431 | 1,365 | $85,293 |
| Clean Ports Climate and Air Quality Grants | 30 | 138 | $8,778 | 414 | $26,333 |
| Clean Ports Zero Emission Technology Deployment Grants | 25 | 317 | $19,653 | 950 | $58,960 |
| Total | 1,015 | 8,149 | $493,079 | 24,447 | $1,479,238 |
| Original Burden Estimation in Initial ICR | |||||
| Grant Program | Average Number of Respondents per Year over ICR Period | Average Annual Temporal Cost for Participants over ICR Period (2024-2026) (hrs) | Average Annual Cost for Participants over ICR Period (2024-2026) (hrs) | Total Hours Over ICR Period | Total Cost Over ICR Period |
| DERA (National, Tribal, and State) | 112 | 11,220 | $641,648 | 33,660 | $1,924,944 |
| Clean School Bus | 50 | 1,784 | $93,795 | 5,353 | $281,386 |
| Clean Heavy Duty | 50 | 576 | $30,281 | 1,728 | $90,842 |
| Clean Ports Program | 100 | 1,008 | $56,784 | 3,025 | $170,353 |
| Ports Planning Awards | 20 | 113 | $6,346 | 338 | $19,037 |
| Ports Deployment of Zero Emissions Technology Awards | 40 | 431 | $24,290 | 1,294 | $72,871 |
| Ports Planning and Deployment of Zero Emissions Technology Awards | 40 | 464 | $26,148 | 1,393 | $78,445 |
| Total | 312 | 14,589 | $822,508 | 43,766 | $2,467,525 |
| Table 17. Difference in Burden from Original Estimation to Revision | |||||
| Grant Program | Difference in Average Number of Respondents per Year over ICR Period | Difference in Average Annual Temporal Cost for Participants over ICR Period (2025-2027) (hrs) | Difference in Average Annual Cost for Participants over ICR Period (2025-2027) (hrs) | Difference in Total Hours Over ICR Period | Difference in Total Cost Over ICR Period |
| DERA Grant Program (National, Tribal, and State) | 511 | -6,632 | -$358,510 | -19,897 | -$1,075,531 |
| Clean School Bus Grant Program | 217 | 796 | $54,571 | 2,388 | $163,711 |
| Clean Heavy-Duty Vehicles Grant Program | 20 | -50 | $2,864 | -150 | $8,593 |
| Clean Ports Program Grant Program | -45 | -553 | -$28,353 | -1,660 | -$85,060 |
| Clean Ports Climate and Air Quality Grants | 10 | 25 | $2,432 | 76 | $7,296 |
| Clean Ports Zero Emission Technology Deployment Grants | -55 | -578 | -$30,785 | -1,737 | -$92,356 |
| Total Difference | 703 | -6,440 | -$329,429 | -19,319 | -$988,287 |
| Relative Difference from Initial ICR Estimate (approved in April 2024) | 225% | -44% | -40% | -44% | -40% |
| Total Time to Complete by Funding Program and Project Period Year | |||||||||||||
| Funding Program | List of Instruments for Awardees to Complete* Includes all optional instruments and information collection |
Estimated Total Hours Required by Awardeesⁱ Year 1 of Project Period |
Estimated Total Hours Required by Awardeesⁱ Year 2 of Project Period |
Estimated Total Hours Required by Awardeesⁱ Year 3 of Project Period |
Estimated Total Hours Required by Awardeesⁱ Year 4 of Project Period* |
Estimated Total Hours Required by Awardees for application and entire project period | Estimated Total Hours Required by Awardees for entire project period | ||||||
| DERA Grant Program | DERA Supplemental Application Template; DERA Eligibility Statement; DERA Scrappage Statement; DERA Project Reporting Template; Utility Partnership Agreement; OTAQ Funding Program Recipient Story Collection Form; BABA Waiver Request (non-form information collection) | 21.3 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 4.1 | 36.5 | 28.5 | ||||||
| Clean School Bus Grant Program | CSB Supplemental Application Template; CSB Eligibility and Scrap Sell Donate Statement; CSB Project Reporting Template; CSB Utility Partnership Statement; OTAQ Funding Program Recipient Story Collection Form; BABA Waiver Request (non-form information collection) | 20.6 | 1.4 | 3.0 | N/A | 35.4 | 25.0 | ||||||
| Clean Heavy-Duty Vehicles Grant Program | CHDV Supplemental Application Template; CHDV Eligibility and Scrappage Statement; CHDV Project Reporting Template; Utility Partnership Agreement; OTAQ Funding Program Recipient Story Collection Form; BABA Waiver Request (non-form information collection) | 18.1 | 1.4 | 3.0 | N/A | 30.8 | 22.5 | ||||||
| Clean Ports Program, Climate and Air Quality Planning Grants | Clean Ports Supplemental Application Template; Clean Ports Climate and Air Quality Planning Project Reporting Template; OTAQ Funding Program Recipient Story Collection Form | 6.3 | 2.5 | 5.0 | N/A | 18.0 | 13.8 | ||||||
| Clean Ports Program, Zero Emission Technology Grants | Clean Ports Supplemental Application Template; Clean Ports Program Scrappage Evidence Statement; Utility Partnership Agreement; Clean Ports Zero-Emission Technology Project Reporting Template; Clean Ports Program Deployment Evidence Form; Clean Ports Program Scrappage Eligibility Statement; OTAQ Funding Program Recipient Story Collection Form; BABA Waiver Request (non-form information collection) | 29.2 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 13.3 | 56.2 | 51.3 | ||||||
| *All project periods of performance are up to 3 years, except for Clean Ports Zero Emission Technology Program and DERA Grant Program, which are up to 4 years. | |||||||||||||
| ⁱTotal Temporal Burden by Program presented in the table above uses a weighted average of participants submitting optional forms to tabulate the estimated temporal burden by program and project period. | |||||||||||||
| Table 2. Unit Burden for DERA Grant Program (State, National, and Tribal & Territory Programs) | Estimated Time Required Over Project Lifetime *does not use Weighted average to account for optional forms |
||||||||||||
| EPA Form Name | EPA Form Number | Share of participants completing (If required, assume 100% of respondents will complete and submit this form) |
Low End Estimate (hrs.) |
High End Estimate (hrs.) |
Average Estimate (hrs.) |
Weighted Average (hrs.) Accounting for Share of Participants Completing Optional Forms |
Range of Time to Complete (hrs.) |
Application | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | |
| DERA Supplemental Application Template | 5900-681 | 100% | 5.2 | 7.6 | 6.4 | 6.4 | 5.2 - 7.6 | 6.4 | |||||
| DERA Eligibility Statement | 5900-687 | 100% | 1.5 | 12.0 | 6.8 | 6.8 | 1.5 - 12 | 1.5 | 6.8 | ||||
| DERA Scrappage Statement | 5900-688 | 100% | 1.5 | 12.0 | 6.8 | 6.8 | 1.5 - 12 | 6.8 | |||||
| DERA Project Reporting Template | 5900-691 | 100% | 12.4 | 15.7 | 14.0 | 14.0 | 12.4 - 15.7 | 7.0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 4 | ||
| Utility Partnership Agreement | 5900-685 | 10% | 1.5 | 6.0 | 3.8 | 0.4 | 1.5 - 6 | 1.5 | 3.8 | ||||
| OTAQ Funding Program Recipient Story Collection Form | TBA | 5% | 1.5 | 3.0 | 2.3 | 0.1 | 1.5 - 3 | 2.3 | |||||
| BABA Waiver Request (non-form information collection) | N/A | 9% | 4.0 | 6.0 | 5.0 | 0.4 | 4 - 6 | 5.0 | |||||
| Total | 47.9 | 34.8 | 23.5 - 56.2 | 9.4 | 29.3 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 6.3 | |||||
| Table 3. Unit Burden for Clean School Bus Grant Program | Estimated Time Required Over Project Lifetime *does not use Weighted average to account for optional forms |
||||||||||||
| EPA Form Name | EPA Form Number | Share of participants completing (If required, assume 100% of respondents will complete and submit this form) |
Low End Estimate (hrs.) |
High End Estimate (hrs.) |
Average Estimate (hrs.) |
Weighted Average (hrs.) Accounting for Share of Participants Completing Optional Forms |
Range of Time to Complete (hrs.) |
Application | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | ||
| CSB Supplemental Application Template | 5900-680 | 100% | 7.2 | 7.6 | 7.4 | 7.4 | 7.2 - 7.6 | 7.4 | |||||
| CSB Eligibility and Scrap Sell Donate Statement | 5900-686 | 100% | 1.5 | 12.0 | 6.8 | 6.8 | 1.5 - 12 | 1.5 | 6.8 | ||||
| CSB Project Reporting Template | 5900-692 | 100% | 12.6 | 14.2 | 13.4 | 13.4 | 12.6 - 14.2 | 9.1 | 1.4 | 2.9 | |||
| CSB Utility Partnership Statement | 5900-693 | 100% | 1.5 | 6.0 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 1.5 - 6 | 1.5 | 3.8 | ||||
| OTAQ Funding Program Recipient Story Collection Form | TBA | 5% | 1.5 | 3.0 | 2.3 | 0.1 | 1.5 - 3 | 2.3 | |||||
| BABA Waiver Request (non-form information collection) | N/A | 20% | 4.0 | 6.0 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 4 - 6 | 5.0 | |||||
| Total | 41.5 | 32.4 | 24.3 - 42.8 | 10.4 | 24.6 | 1.4 | 5.2 | ||||||
| Table 4. Unit Burden for Clean Heavy-Duty Vehicles Program | Estimated Time Required Over Project Lifetime *does not use Weighted average to account for optional forms |
||||||||||||
| EPA Form Name | EPA Form Number | Share of participants completing (If required, assume 100% of respondents will complete and submit this form) |
Low End Estimate (hrs.) |
High End Estimate (hrs.) |
Average Estimate (hrs.) |
Weighted Average (hrs.) Accounting for Share of Participants Completing Optional Forms |
Range of Time to Complete (hrs.) |
Application | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | ||
| CHDV Supplemental Application Template | 5900-689 | 100% | 6.8 | 7.6 | 7.2 | 7.2 | 6.8 - 7.6 | 7.2 | |||||
| CHDV Eligibility and Scrappage Statement | 5900-682 | 100% | 1.0 | 12.0 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 1 - 12 | 1.0 | 6.5 | ||||
| CHDV Project Reporting Template | 5900-683 | 100% | 11.3 | 14.1 | 12.7 | 12.7 | 11.3 - 14.1 | 8.4 | 1.4 | 2.9 | |||
| Utility Partnership Agreement | 5900-685 | 10% | 1.5 | 6.0 | 3.8 | 0.4 | 1.5 - 6 | 1.5 | 3.8 | ||||
| OTAQ Funding Program Recipient Story Collection Form | TBA | 5% | 1.5 | 3.0 | 2.3 | 0.1 | 1.5 - 3 | 2.3 | |||||
| BABA Waiver Request (non-form information collection) | N/A | 57% | 4.0 | 6.0 | 5.0 | 2.9 | 4 - 6 | 5.0 | |||||
| Total | 39.9 | 29.7 | 15.3 - 35.1 | 9.7 | 23.7 | 1.4 | 5.2 | ||||||
| Table 5. Unit Burden for Clean Ports Program Climate and Air Quality Planning Grants | Estimated Time Required Over Project Lifetime *does not use Weighted average to account for optional forms |
||||||||||||
| EPA Form Name | EPA Form Number | Share of participants completing (If required, assume 100% of respondents will complete and submit this form) |
Low End Estimate (hrs.) |
High End Estimate (hrs.) |
Average Estimate (hrs.) |
Weighted Average (hrs.) Accounting for Share of Participants Completing Optional Forms |
Range of Time to Complete (hrs.) |
Application | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | ||
| Clean Ports Supplemental Application Template | 5900-679 | 100% | 2.2 | 6.1 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 2.2 - 6.1 | 4.2 | |||||
| Clean Ports Climate and Air Quality Planning Project Reporting Template | TBA | 100% | 13.0 | 15.0 | 14.0 | 14.0 | 13 - 15 | 6.2 | 2.5 | 5 | |||
| OTAQ Funding Program Recipient Story Collection Form | TBA | 5% | 1.5 | 3.0 | 2.3 | 0.1 | 1.5 - 3 | 2.3 | |||||
| Total | 20.5 | 18.3 | 16.7 - 24.1 | 4.2 | 8.5 | 2.5 | 5.0 | ||||||
| Table 6. Unit Burden for Clean Ports Program Zero Emissions Technology Deployment Grant | Estimated Time Required Over Project Lifetime *does not use Weighted average to account for optional forms |
||||||||||||
| EPA Form Name | EPA Form Number | Share of participants completing (If required, assume 100% of respondents will complete and submit this form) |
Low End Estimate (hrs.) |
High End Estimate (hrs.) |
Average Estimate (hrs.) |
Weighted Average (hrs.) Accounting for Share of Participants Completing Optional Forms |
Range of Time to Complete (hrs.) |
Application | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | |
| Clean Ports Supplemental Application Template | 5900-679 | 100% | 2.2 | 6.1 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 2.2 - 6.1 | 4.2 | |||||
| Clean Ports Program Scrappage Evidence Statement | 5900-684 | 100% | 1.5 | 12.0 | 6.8 | 6.8 | 1.5 - 12 | 6.8 | |||||
| Utility Partnership Agreement | 5900-685 | 50% | 1.5 | 6.0 | 3.8 | 1.9 | 1.5 - 6 | 1.5 | 3.8 | ||||
| Clean Ports Zero-Emission Technology Project Reporting Template | TBA | 100% | 22.4 | 29.6 | 26.0 | 26.0 | 22.4 - 29.6 | 15.9 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 4.7 | ||
| Clean Ports Program Deployment Evidence Form | TBA | 100% | 1.5 | 12.0 | 6.8 | 6.8 | 1.5 - 12 | 6.8 | |||||
| Clean Ports Program Scrappage Eligibility Statement | TBA | 100% | 1.5 | 12.0 | 6.8 | 6.8 | 1.5 - 12 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.7 | ||
| OTAQ Funding Program Recipient Story Collection Form | TBA | 5% | 1.5 | 3.0 | 2.3 | 0.1 | 1.5 - 3 | 2.3 | |||||
| BABA Waiver Request (non-form information collection) | N/A | 60% | 4.0 | 6.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 4 - 6 | 5.0 | |||||
| Total | 63.0 | 55.5 | 36.1 - 86.7 | 5.7 | 33.1 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 15.4 | |||||
| Table 7: State, Local, Private Loaded Wage Rates (2024$) | |||||||||||||||||
| State, Local, Private Loaded Wage Rates (2024$) | Agency Wage Rates (2024$) | ||||||||||||||||
| Labor Category | Wage1 | Fringe Benefit1 | Total Compensation | Overhead % wage2 | Overhead | Hourly Loaded Wages3 | BLS Occupational Group | Labor Category | Data Source for Wage Information | Wage ($/hour) | Fringes as % wage2 | Fringe Benefit | Total Compensation | Overhead as % of Total Compensation3 | Overhead | Loaded Wage ($/hour) | |
| (a) | (b) | (c) =(a)+ (b) | (d) | (e)= (c) *(d) | (f)=(c)+(e) | ||||||||||||
| State & local governments (including schools) | Technical | GS-13 Step 10 pay rates1 | $73.73 | 63.9% | $47.11 | $120.84 | 20% | $24.17 | $145.01 | ||||||||
| Managerial | $46.48 | $26.48 | $72.96 | 20% | $14.59 | $87.55 | State and Local Government Workers: Management, Professional, and Related | ||||||||||
| Professional / Technical | $34.88 | $25.57 | $60.45 | 20% | $12.09 | $72.54 | State and Local Government Workers: Public Administration | Footnotes: | |||||||||
| Clerical | $24.98 | $18.56 | $43.54 | 20% | $8.71 | $52.25 | State and Local Government Workers: Office and Administrative Support | 1 | Source: U.S. Office of Personnel Management (2024), Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-PA-VA-WV area. Retrieved November 12, 2024 from https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/salaries-wages/salary-tables/pdf/2024/DCB.pdf | ||||||||
| 2 | EPA’s Handbook on Valuing Changes in Time Use Induced by Regulatory Requirements and Other EPA Actions recommends a study by the Congressional Budget Office for estimating benefit values for federal government workers. The study reports that total benefits account for 63.9 percent of average wages in the federal government sector. Therefore, 63.9 percent of the wage is used to calculate the fringe in the derivation of Agency wage rates. | ||||||||||||||||
| Private fleets | 3 | An overhead rate of 20% is used based on assumptions in Handbook on Valuing Changes in Time Use Induced by Regulatory Requirements and Other U.S. EPA Actions. | |||||||||||||||
| Managerial | $50.70 | $22.91 | $73.61 | 20% | $14.72 | $88.33 | Service Providing Industries: Management, Professional, and Related Occupations | ||||||||||
| Professional / Technical | $24.80 | $11.03 | $35.83 | 20% | $7.17 | $43.00 | Service Providing Industries: Transportation and Material Moving Occupations | ||||||||||
| Clerical | $25.32 | $10.24 | $35.56 | 20% | $7.11 | $42.67 | Service Providing Industries: Office and Adminstrative Support Occupations | Weighting factors | |||||||||
| Footnotes: | Management | Technical | Clerical | ||||||||||||||
| 1Source: State and Local Governments - Bureau of Labor Statistics Economic News Release Table 3. State and local government, by occupational and industry group, June 2024. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecec.t03.htm Private Fleets - Bureau of Labor Statistics Economic News Release Table 4. Private industry workers by occupational and industry group, June 2024. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecec.t04.htm |
18% | 24% | 58% | ||||||||||||||
| 2An overhead rate of 20% is used based on assumptions in Handbook on Valuing Changes in Time Use Induced by Regulatory Requirements and other U.S. EPA Actions. | Source: Average contribution of each labor category in the CSB Rebate Program Emergency ICR. | ||||||||||||||||
| 3Values may not sum due to rounding. Wage rates are rounded to the nearest cent. | Weighted Average Wage Rates | ||||||||||||||||
| State and Local | $63.55 | ||||||||||||||||
| Private | $50.94 | ||||||||||||||||
| Universe of Respondents for Grant Programs Covered under this Information Collection | ||||
| Table 8a. Distribution of Grant Recipients to State, Local, and Private Entities by Program | ||||
| Approved Recipient Per Year | Number of State Recipients | Number of Local Recipients | Number of Private Recipients | Total Recipients |
| DERA Grant Program | 55 | 42 | 15 | 112 |
| DERA National | 5 | 30 | 15 | 50 |
| DERA Tribal & Territory | 0 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| DERA State | 50 | 0 | 0 | 50 |
| Clean School Bus Grant Program | 1 | 25 | 24 | 50 |
| Clean Heavy-Duty Vehicles Grant Program | 13 | 54 | 3 | 70 |
| Clean Ports Grant Program | 17 | 35 | 3 | 55 |
| Clean Ports Climate and Air Quality Planning Grant | 10 | 20 | 0 | 30 |
| Clean Ports Zero Emission Technology Grant | 7 | 15 | 3 | 25 |
| Total | 86 | 156 | 45 | 287 |
| Table 8b. Distribution of Grant Applicants by State, Local, Private Entities by Program | ||||
| Anticipated Applicants Per Year | Number of State Applicants | Number of Local Applicants | Number of Private Applicants | Total Applicants |
| DERA Grant Program | 60 | 85 | 30 | 175 |
| DERA National | 10 | 60 | 30 | 100 |
| DERA Tribal & Territory | 0 | 25 | 0 | 25 |
| DERA State | 50 | 0 | 0 | 50 |
| Clean School Bus Grant Program | 4 | 100 | 96 | 200 |
| Clean Heavy-Duty Vehicles Grant Program | 19 | 77 | 4 | 100 |
| Clean Ports Grant Program | 34 | 70 | 6 | 110 |
| Clean Ports Climate and Air Quality Planning Grant | 20 | 40 | 0 | 60 |
| Clean Ports Zero Emission Technology Grant | 14 | 30 | 6 | 50 |
| Total | 117 | 332 | 136 | 585 |
| Source: Estimates provided by EPA/OTAQ (Tim Thomas) via email on 9/06/2023: We expect no more than 200 Recipients per grant program and no more than 50 to be selected for project funding for each program. Sarah Harrison updated counts of selectees for Clean Ports and CHDV on 11/13/2024 |
||||
| Table 8c. Share of Participant by Type and Program | ||||
| Anticipated Participants Per Year | Share of State Participants | Share of Local Participants | Share of Private Participants | Total Participants |
| DERA Grant Program | 34% | 49% | 17% | 100% |
| DERA National | 10% | 60% | 30% | 100% |
| DERA Tribal & Territory | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| DERA State | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| Clean School Bus Grant Program | 2% | 50% | 48% | 100% |
| Clean Heavy-Duty Vehicles Grant Program | 19% | 77% | 4% | 100% |
| Clean Ports Grant Program | 31% | 64% | 5% | 100% |
| Clean Ports Climate and Air Quality Planning Grant | 33% | 67% | 0% | 100% |
| Clean Ports Zero Emission Technology Grant | 28% | 60% | 12% | 100% |
| Anticipated Number of Responses by Program Throughout Grant Funding Life Cycle and ICR Period | ||||||||
| This tab details how many responses are anticipated by funding program and FY, based on the following assumptions: (1) DERA is funded annually each year; (2) CSB Grant competitions are held each year through 202026; (3) CHDV and Clean Ports Programs are 1-time programs, that is, only one round of competitive funding is issued, and the burden for these applications is outside of the scope of this ICR revision. | ||||||||
| Where X= 2024, ICR Year 0 | ||||||||
| Grant Program | Count of Applicants (awarded in FYX) | Count of grantees completing interannual reports in first reporting year (originally awarded in FYX-1) | Count of grantees completing interannual reports in second reporting year (originally awarded in FYX-2) | Count of grantees completing interannual reports in third reporting year (originally awarded in FYX-3) | Count of grantees completing their fourth reporting year (originally awarded in FYX-4) | Total Respondents by Program in ICR Year 0 | ||
| DERA Grant Program | ||||||||
| DERA National | 100 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 300 | ||
| DERA Tribal | 25 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 73 | ||
| DERA State | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 250 | ||
| Clean School Bus Grant Program | 200 | 50 | 0 | 0 | N/A | 250 | ||
| Clean Heavy-Duty Vehicles Program | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | N/A | 100 | ||
| Clean Ports Grant Program | 0 | |||||||
| Clean Ports Climate and Air Quality Planning Grants | 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | N/A | 60 | ||
| Clean Ports Deployment of Zero Emissions Technology Grants | 50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50 | ||
| Total | 585 | 162 | 112 | 112 | 112 | 1083 | ||
| Where X= 2025, ICR Year 1 | ||||||||
| Grant Program | Count of Applicants (awarded in FYX) | Count of grantees completing interannual reports in first reporting year (originally awarded in FYX-1) | Count of grantees completing interannual reports in second reporting year (originally awarded in FYX-2) | Count of grantees completing interannual reports in third reporting year (originally awarded in FYX-3) | Count of grantees completing their fourth reporting year (originally awarded in FYX-4) | Total Respondents by Program in ICR Year 1 | ||
| DERA Grant Program | ||||||||
| DERA National | 100 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 300 | ||
| DERA Tribal | 25 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 73 | ||
| DERA State | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 250 | ||
| Clean School Bus Grant Program | 200 | 50 | 50 | 0 | N/A | 300 | ||
| Clean Heavy-Duty Vehicles Program | 0 | 70 | 0 | 0 | N/A | 70 | ||
| Clean Ports Grant Program | 0 | |||||||
| Clean Ports Climate and Air Quality Planning Grants | 0 | 30 | 0 | 0 | N/A | 30 | ||
| Clean Ports Deployment of Zero Emissions Technology Grants | 0 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | ||
| Total | 375 | 287 | 162 | 112 | 112 | 1048 | ||
| Where X= 2026, ICR Year 2 | ||||||||
| Table 9. Number of Participants in each Reporting Stage in 2026 | ||||||||
| Grant Program | Count of Applicants (awarded in FYX) | Count of grantees completing interannual reports in first reporting year (originally awarded in FYX-1) | Count of grantees completing interannual reports in second reporting year (originally awarded in FYX-2) | Count of grantees completing interannual reports in third reporting year (originally awarded in FYX-3) | Count of grantees completing their fourth reporting year (originally awarded in FYX-4) | Total Respondents by Program in ICR Year 2 | ||
| DERA Grant Program | ||||||||
| DERA National | 100 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 300 | ||
| DERA Tribal | 25 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 73 | ||
| DERA State | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 250 | ||
| Clean School Bus Grant Program | 200 | 50 | 50 | 50 | N/A | 350 | ||
| Clean Heavy-Duty Vehicles Program | 0 | 0 | 70 | 0 | N/A | 70 | ||
| Clean Ports Grant Program | 0 | |||||||
| Clean Ports Climate and Air Quality Planning Grants | 0 | 0 | 30 | 0 | N/A | 30 | ||
| Clean Ports Deployment of Zero Emissions Technology Grants | 0 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 25 | ||
| Total | 375 | 162 | 287 | 162 | 112 | 1098 | ||
| Where X= 2027, ICR Year 3 | ||||||||
| Grant Program | Count of Applicants (awarded in FYX) | Count of grantees completing interannual reports in first reporting year (originally awarded in FYX-1) | Count of grantees completing interannual reports in second reporting year (originally awarded in FYX-2) | Count of grantees completing interannual reports in third reporting year (originally awarded in FYX-3) | Count of grantees completing their fourth reporting year (originally awarded in FYX-4) | Total Respondents by Program in ICR Expiration Year 3/Renewal Year 1 | ||
| DERA Grant Program | ||||||||
| DERA National | 100 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 300 | ||
| DERA Tribal | 25 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 73 | ||
| DERA State | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 250 | ||
| Clean School Bus Grant Program | 0 | 50 | 50 | 50 | N/A | 150 | ||
| Clean Heavy-Duty Vehicles Program | 0 | 0 | 0 | 70 | N/A | 70 | ||
| Clean Ports Grant Program | 0 | |||||||
| Clean Ports Climate and Air Quality Planning Grants | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 | N/A | 30 | ||
| Clean Ports Deployment of Zero Emissions Technology Grants | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 25 | ||
| Total | 175 | 162 | 162 | 287 | 112 | 898 | ||
| Where X= 2028; ICR set to expire | ||||||||
| Grant Program | Count of Applicants (awarded in FYX) | Count of grantees completing interannual reports in first reporting year (originally awarded in FYX-1) | Count of grantees completing interannual reports in second reporting year (originally awarded in FYX-2) | Count of grantees completing interannual reports in third reporting year (originally awarded in FYX-3) | Count of grantees completing their fourth reporting year (originally awarded in FYX-4) | Total Respondents by Program in ICR Renewal Year 2 | ||
| DERA Grant Program | ||||||||
| DERA National | 100 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 300 | ||
| DERA Tribal | 25 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 73 | ||
| DERA State | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 250 | ||
| Clean School Bus Grant Program | 0 | 0 | 50 | 50 | N/A | 100 | ||
| Clean Heavy-Duty Vehicles Program | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | N/A | 0 | ||
| Clean Ports Grant Program | 0 | |||||||
| Clean Ports Climate and Air Quality Planning Grants | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | N/A | 0 | ||
| Clean Ports Deployment of Zero Emissions Technology Grants | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 25 | ||
| Total | 175 | 112 | 162 | 162 | 137 | 748 | ||
| Total Number of Respondents by ICR Year and Program | ||||||||
| Grant Program | Total Number of Respondents by Program in ICR Year 1 | Total Number of Respondents by Program in ICR Year 2 | Total Number of Respondents by Program in ICR Year 3 | Average Number of Respondents over ICR (2025-2027) | Total Number of Respondents Over ICR (2025-2027) | |||
| DERA Grant Program | 623 | 623 | 623 | 623 | 1,869 | |||
| DERA National | 300 | 300 | 300 | 300 | 900 | |||
| DERA Tribal | 73 | 73 | 73 | 73 | 219 | |||
| DERA State | 250 | 250 | 250 | 250 | 750 | |||
| Clean School Bus Grant Program | 300 | 350 | 150 | 267 | 800 | |||
| Clean Heavy-Duty Vehicles Program | 70 | 70 | 70 | 70 | 210 | |||
| Clean Ports Grant Program | 55 | 55 | 55 | 55 | 165 | |||
| Clean Ports Climate and Air Quality Planning Grants | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 90 | |||
| Clean Ports Deployment of Zero Emissions Technology Grants | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 75 | |||
| Total | 1,048 | 1,098 | 898 | 1,015 | 3,044 | |||
| Total Anticipated Temporal Burden for Responses by ICR Year and Program | ||||||||
| Grant Program | Total Temporal Cost by Program in ICR Year 1 (hrs) | Total Temporal Cost by Program in ICR Year 2 (hrs) | Total Temporal Cost by Program in ICR Year 3 (hrs) | Average Annual Temporal Cost for Participants over ICR Period (2025-2027) (hrs) | Total Temporal Cost Over ICR (2025-2027) (hrs) | |||
| DERA Grant Program | 4,588 | 4,588 | 4,588 | 4,588 | 13,763 | |||
| DERA National | 2,223 | 2,223 | 2,223 | 2,223 | 6,669 | |||
| DERA Tribal | 542 | 542 | 542 | 542 | 1,625 | |||
| DERA State | 1,823 | 1,823 | 1,823 | 1,823 | 5,469 | |||
| Clean School Bus Grant Program | 3,170 | 3,321 | 1,251 | 2,580 | 7,741 | |||
| Clean Heavy-Duty Vehicles Program | 1,269 | 98 | 211 | 526 | 1,578 | |||
| Clean Ports Grant Program | 920.416666666667 | 184.6875 | 259.6875 | 455 | 1,365 | |||
| Clean Ports Climate and Air Quality Planning Grants | 189 | 75 | 150 | 138 | 414 | |||
| Clean Ports Deployment of Zero Emissions Technology Grants | 731 | 110 | 110 | 317 | 950 | |||
| Total | 9,947 | 8,191 | 6,309 | 8,149 | 24,447 | |||
| Total Anticipated Cost for Participants Responses by ICR Year and Program | ||||||||
| Grant Program | Total Cost by Program in ICR Year 1 ($) | Total Cost by Program in ICR Year 2 ($) | Total Cost by Program in ICR Year 3 ($) | Average Annual Cost for Participants over ICR Period (2025-2027; $) | Total Cost Over ICR (2025-2027) ($) | |||
| DERA Grant Program | $283,138 | $283,138 | $283,138 | $283,138 | $849,413 | |||
| DERA National | $132,867 | $132,867 | $132,867 | $132,867 | $398,601 | |||
| DERA Tribal | $34,415 | $34,415 | $34,415 | $34,415 | $103,244 | |||
| DERA State | $115,856 | $115,856 | $115,856 | $115,856 | $347,568 | |||
| Clean School Bus Grant Program | $182,265 | $190,925 | $71,907 | $148,366 | $445,097 | |||
| Clean Heavy-Duty Vehicles Program | $79,973 | $6,175 | $13,287 | $33,145 | $99,435 | |||
| Clean Ports Grant Program | $57,385 | $11,571 | $16,337 | $28,431 | $85,293 | |||
| Clean Ports Climate and Air Quality Planning Grants | $12,035 | $4,766 | $9,532 | $8,778 | $26,333 | |||
| Clean Ports Deployment of Zero Emissions Technology Grants | $45,351 | $6,805 | $6,805 | $19,653 | $58,960 | |||
| Total | $602,761 | $491,809 | $384,668 | $493,079 | $1,479,238 | |||
| Table 15. Total Reporting Burden and Cost by Grant Program | ||||||||
| Grant Program | Average Annual Temporal Cost for Participants over ICR Period (2025-2027) (hrs) | Average Annual Cost for Participants over ICR Period (2025-2027; $) | Total Temporal Cost Over ICR (2025-2027) (hrs) | Total Cost Over ICR (2025-2027) ($) | ||||
| DERA Grant Program | 4,588 | $283,138 | 13,763 | $849,413 | ||||
| DERA National | 2,223 | $132,867 | 6,669 | $398,601 | ||||
| DERA Tribal | 542 | $34,415 | 1,625 | $103,244 | ||||
| DERA State | 1,823 | $115,856 | 5,469 | $347,568 | ||||
| Clean School Bus Grant Program | 2,580 | $148,366 | 7,741 | $445,097 | ||||
| Clean Heavy-Duty Vehicles Program | 526 | $33,145 | 1,578 | $99,435 | ||||
| Clean Ports Grant Program | 455 | $28,431 | 1,365 | $85,293 | ||||
| Clean Ports Climate and Air Quality Planning Grants | 138 | $8,778 | 414 | $26,333 | ||||
| Clean Ports Deployment of Zero Emissions Technology Grants | 317 | $19,653 | 950 | $58,960 | ||||
| Total | 8,149 | $493,079 | 24,447 | $1,479,238 | ||||
| Table 10A. Unit Burden for DERA Grant Program (State, National, and Tribal & Territory Programs) | Estimated Time Required Over Project Lifetime | ||||||||||||||||
| Item # | EPA Form Name | EPA Form Number | Share of Responses | Low End Estimate (hrs.) |
High End Estimate (hrs.) |
Average Estimate (hrs.) |
Range of Time to Complete (hrs.) |
Application | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | |||||
| a | DERA Supplemental Application Template | 5900-681 | 100% | 5.2 | 7.6 | 6.4 | 5.2 - 7.6 | 6.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||
| b | DERA Eligibility Statement | 5900-687 | 100% | 1.5 | 12.0 | 6.8 | 1.5 - 12 | 1.5 | 6.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||
| c | DERA Scrappage Statement | 5900-688 | 100% | 1.5 | 12.0 | 6.8 | 1.5 - 12 | 0.0 | 6.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||
| d | DERA Project Reporting Template | 5900-691 | 100% | 12.4 | 15.7 | 14.0 | 12.4 - 15.7 | 0.0 | 7.0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 4.0 | |||||
| e | Utility Partnership Agreement | 5900-685 | 10% | 1.5 | 6.0 | 3.8 | 1.5 - 6 | 1.5 | 3.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||
| f | OTAQ Funding Program Recipient Story Collection Form | TBA | 5% | 1.5 | 3.0 | 2.3 | 1.5 - 3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.3 | |||||
| g | BABA Waiver Request (non-form information collection) | N/A | 9% | 4.0 | 6.0 | 5.0 | 4 - 6 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||
| h | Total Hours per Complete Response (a + b + c + d + e + f + g) |
47.9 | 23.5 - 56.2 | 9.4 | 29.3 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 6.3 | |||||||||
| i | Total Hours per Required Response (a + b + c + d) |
33.9 | 20.5 - 47.2 | 7.9 | 20.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 4.0 | |||||||||
| j | Weighted Average of Response | 34.8 | 21.1 - 48.5 | 8.0 | 21.3 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 4.1 | |||||||||
| Table 10B. Cost to State and Local Respondents to Complete DERA Grant Program (State, National, and Tribal & Territory Programs) | Estimated Cost Required Over Project Lifetime | ||||||||||||||||
| Item # | EPA Form Name | EPA Form Number | Share of Responses | Low End Estimate ($) |
High End Estimate ($) |
Average Estimate ($) |
Range of Cost to Complete ($) |
Application | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | |||||
| a | DERA Supplemental Application Template | 5900-681 | 100% | $327 | $480 | $404 | $327 - $480 | $404 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
| b | DERA Eligibility Statement | 5900-687 | 100% | $95 | $763 | $429 | $95 - $763 | $95 | $429 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
| c | DERA Scrappage Statement | 5900-688 | 100% | $95 | $763 | $429 | $95 - $763 | $0 | $429 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
| d | DERA Project Reporting Template | 5900-691 | 100% | $786 | $997 | $891 | $786 - $997 | $0 | $447 | $95 | $95 | $254 | |||||
| e | Utility Partnership Agreement | 5900-685 | 10% | $95 | $381 | $238 | $95 - $381 | $95 | $238 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
| f | OTAQ Funding Program Recipient Story Collection Form | TBA | 5% | $95 | $191 | $143 | $95 - $191 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $143 | |||||
| g | BABA Waiver Request (non-form information collection) | N/A | 9% | $254 | $381 | $318 | $254 - $381 | $0 | $318 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
| h | Total Cost Per Complete Response (a + b + c + d + e + f + g) |
$3,043 | $1,749 - $3,955 | $594 | $1,861 | $95 | $95 | $397 | |||||||||
| i | Total Cost Per Required Response (a + b + c + d) |
$2,153 | $1,304 - $3,002 | $499 | $1,305 | $95 | $95 | $254 | |||||||||
| j | Total Cost of Response using Weighted Average of Share of Respondents Submitting Optional Forms | $2,212 | $508 | $1,357 | $95 | $95 | $261 | ||||||||||
| k | Anticipated Number of State and Local Respondents per Year | 145 | 97 | 97 | 97 | 97 | |||||||||||
| l | Total Cost for Program by Stage (j) x (k) |
$73,716 | $131,604 | $9,246 | $9,246 | $25,350 | |||||||||||
| m | Total Cost for State and Local Respondents (Σ l) |
$249,164 | |||||||||||||||
| Table 10C. Cost to Private Respondents to Complete DERA Grant Program (State, National, and Tribal & Territory Programs) | Estimated Cost Required Over Project Lifetime | ||||||||||||||||
| Item # | EPA Form Name | EPA Form Number | Share of Responses | Low End Estimate ($) |
High End Estimate ($) |
Average Estimate ($) |
Range of Cost to Complete ($) |
Application | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | |||||
| a | DERA Supplemental Application Template | 5900-681 | 100% | $262 | $385 | $323 | $262 - $385 | $323 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
| b | DERA Eligibility Statement | 5900-687 | 100% | $76 | $611 | $344 | $76 - $611 | $76 | $344 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
| c | DERA Scrappage Statement | 5900-688 | 100% | $76 | $611 | $344 | $76 - $611 | $0 | $344 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
| d | DERA Project Reporting Template | 5900-691 | 100% | $630 | $799 | $715 | $630 - $799 | $0 | $358 | $76 | $76 | $204 | |||||
| e | Utility Partnership Agreement | 5900-685 | 10% | $76 | $306 | $191 | $76 - $306 | $76 | $191 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
| f | OTAQ Funding Program Recipient Story Collection Form | TBA | 5% | $76 | $153 | $115 | $76 - $153 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $115 | |||||
| g | BABA Waiver Request (non-form information collection) | N/A | 9% | $204 | $306 | $255 | $204 - $306 | $0 | $255 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
| h | Total Cost Per Complete Response (a + b + c + d + e + f + g) |
$2,184 | $1,198 - $2,865 | $476 | $1,237 | $76 | $76 | $318 | |||||||||
| i | Total Cost Per Required Response (a + b + c + d) |
$1,726 | $1,046 - $2,406 | $400 | $1,046 | $76 | $76 | $204 | |||||||||
| j | Total Cost of Response using Weighted Average of Share of Respondents Submitting Optional Forms | $1,773 | $408 | $1,088 | $76 | $76 | $209 | ||||||||||
| k | Anticipated Number of Private Respondents per Year | 30 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | |||||||||||
| l | Total Cost for Program by Stage (j) x (k) |
$12,226 | $16,314 | $1,146 | $1,146 | $3,142 | |||||||||||
| m | Total Cost for Private Respondents (Σ l) |
$33,974 | |||||||||||||||
| Table 11A. Unit Burden for Clean School Bus Grant Program | Estimated Time Required Over Project Lifetime | ||||||||||||||||
| Item # | EPA Form Name | EPA Form Number | Share of Responses | Low End Estimate (hrs.) |
High End Estimate (hrs.) |
Average Estimate (hrs.) |
Range of Time to Complete (hrs.) |
Application | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | ||||||
| a | CSB Supplemental Application Template | 5900-680 | 100% | 7.15 | 7.55 | 7.35 | 7.2 - 7.6 | 7.35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| b | CSB Eligibility and Scrap Sell Donate Statement | 5900-686 | 100% | 1.5 | 12 | 6.75 | 1.5 - 12 | 1.5 | 6.75 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| c | CSB Project Reporting Template | 5900-692 | 100% | 12.6 | 14.2 | 13.4 | 12.6 - 14.2 | 0 | 9.1 | 1.4 | 2.9 | ||||||
| d | CSB Utility Partnership Statement | 5900-693 | 100% | 1.5 | 6 | 3.75 | 1.5 - 6 | 1.5 | 3.75 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| e | OTAQ Funding Program Recipient Story Collection Form | TBA | 5% | 1.5 | 3 | 2.25 | 1.5 - 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.25 | ||||||
| f | BABA Waiver Request (non-form information collection) | N/A | 20% | 4 | 6 | 5 | 4 - 6 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| g | Total Hours per Complete Response (a + b + c + d + e + f) |
41.5 | 28.3 - 48.8 | 10.4 | 24.6 | 1.4 | 5.2 | ||||||||||
| i | Total Hours per Required Response (a + b + c + d) |
31.3 | 22.8 - 39.8 | 10.4 | 19.6 | 1.4 | 2.9 | ||||||||||
| j | Weighted Average of Response | 32.4 | 23.6 - 41.1 | 10.4 | 20.6 | 1.4 | 3.0 | ||||||||||
| Table 11B. Cost to State and Local Respondents to Complete Clean School Bus Grant Program | Estimated Cost Required Over Project Lifetime | ||||||||||||||||
| Item # | EPA Form Name | EPA Form Number | Share of Responses | Low End Estimate ($) |
High End Estimate ($) |
Average Estimate ($) |
Range of Cost to Complete ($) |
Application | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | ||||||
| a | CSB Supplemental Application Template | 5900-680 | 100% | $454 | $480 | $467 | $454 - $480 | $467 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||
| b | CSB Eligibility and Scrap Sell Donate Statement | 5900-686 | 100% | $95 | $763 | $429 | $95 - $763 | $95 | $429 | $0 | $0 | ||||||
| c | CSB Project Reporting Template | 5900-692 | 100% | $801 | $902 | $852 | $801 - $902 | $0 | $578 | $89 | $184 | ||||||
| d | CSB Utility Partnership Statement | 5900-693 | 100% | $95 | $381 | $238 | $95 - $381 | $95 | $238 | $0 | $0 | ||||||
| e | OTAQ Funding Program Recipient Story Collection Form | TBA | 5% | $95 | $191 | $143 | $95 - $191 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $143 | ||||||
| f | BABA Waiver Request (non-form information collection) | N/A | 20% | $254 | $381 | $318 | $254 - $381 | $0 | $318 | $0 | $0 | ||||||
| g | Total Cost Per Complete Response (a + b + c + d + e + f) |
$2,447 | $1,796 - $3,098 | $658 | $1,563 | $89 | $327 | ||||||||||
| h | Total Cost Per Required Response (a + b + c + d) |
$1,986 | $1,446 - $2,526 | $658 | $1,246 | $89 | $184 | ||||||||||
| i | Total Cost of Response using Weighted Average of Share of Respondents Submitting Optional Forms | $2,057 | $658 | $1,309 | $89 | $191 | |||||||||||
| j | Anticipated Number of State and Local Respondents per Year | 104 | 26 | 26 | 26 | ||||||||||||
| k | Total Cost for Program by Stage (i) x (j) |
$68,404 | $34,037 | $2,313 | $4,977 | ||||||||||||
| l | Total Cost for State and Local Respondents (Σ k) |
$109,731 | |||||||||||||||
| Table 11C. Cost to Private Respondents to Complete Clean School Bus Grant Program | Estimated Cost Required Over Project Lifetime | ||||||||||||||||
| Item # | EPA Form Name | EPA Form Number | Share of Responses | Low End Estimate ($) |
High End Estimate ($) |
Average Estimate ($) |
Range of Cost to Complete ($) |
Application | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | ||||||
| a | CSB Supplemental Application Template | 5900-680 | 100% | $364 | $385 | $374 | $364 - $385 | $374 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||
| b | CSB Eligibility and Scrap Sell Donate Statement | 5900-686 | 100% | $76 | $611 | $344 | $76 - $611 | $76 | $344 | $0 | $0 | ||||||
| c | CSB Project Reporting Template | 5900-692 | 100% | $642 | $723 | $683 | $642 - $723 | $0 | $464 | $71 | $148 | ||||||
| d | CSB Utility Partnership Statement | 5900-693 | 100% | $76 | $306 | $191 | $76 - $306 | $76 | $191 | $0 | $0 | ||||||
| e | OTAQ Funding Program Recipient Story Collection Form | TBA | 5% | $76 | $153 | $115 | $76 - $153 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $115 | ||||||
| f | BABA Waiver Request (non-form information collection) | N/A | 20% | $204 | $306 | $255 | $204 - $306 | $0 | $255 | $0 | $0 | ||||||
| g | Total Cost Per Complete Response (a + b + c + d + e + f) |
$1,961 | $1,440 - $2,483 | $527 | $1,253 | $71 | $262 | ||||||||||
| h | Total Cost Per Required Response (a + b + c + d) |
$1,592 | $1,159 - $2,025 | $527 | $998 | $71 | $148 | ||||||||||
| i | Total Cost of Response using Weighted Average of Share of Respondents Submitting Optional Forms | $1,649 | $527 | $1,049 | $71 | $153 | |||||||||||
| j | Anticipated Number of Private Respondents per Year | 96 | 24 | 24 | 24 | ||||||||||||
| k | Total Cost for Program by Stage (i) x (j) |
$50,615 | $25,185 | $1,712 | $3,683 | ||||||||||||
| l | Total Cost for Private Respondents (Σ k) |
$81,195 | |||||||||||||||
| Table 12A. Unit Burden for Clean Heavy-Duty Vehicles Grant Program | Estimated Time Required Over Project Lifetime | ||||||||||||||||
| Item # | EPA Form Name | EPA Form Number | Share of Responses | Low End Estimate (hrs.) |
High End Estimate (hrs.) |
Average Estimate (hrs.) |
Range of Time to Complete (hrs.) |
Application | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | ||||||
| a | CHDV Supplemental Application Template | 5900-689 | 100% | 6.8 | 7.6 | 7.2 | 6.8 - 7.6 | 7.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||||||
| b | CHDV Eligibility and Scrappage Statement | 5900-682 | 100% | 1.0 | 12.0 | 6.5 | 1 - 12 | 1.0 | 6.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||||||
| c | CHDV Project Reporting Template | 5900-683 | 100% | 11.3 | 14.1 | 12.7 | 11.3 - 14.1 | 0.0 | 8.4 | 1.4 | 2.9 | ||||||
| d | Utility Partnership Agreement | 5900-685 | 10% | 1.5 | 6.0 | 3.8 | 1.5 - 6 | 1.5 | 3.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||||||
| e | OTAQ Funding Program Recipient Story Collection Form | TBA | 5% | 1.5 | 3.0 | 2.3 | 1.5 - 3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.3 | ||||||
| f | BABA Waiver Request (non-form information collection) | N/A | 57% | 4.0 | 6.0 | 5.0 | 4 - 6 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||||||
| g | Total Hours per Complete Response (a + b + c + d + e + f) |
32.3 | 26.1 - 48.6 | 9.7 | 23.7 | 1.4 | 5.2 | ||||||||||
| h | Total Hours per Required Response (a + b + c ) |
26.3 | 19.1 - 33.6 | 8.2 | 14.9 | 1.4 | 2.9 | ||||||||||
| i | Weighted Average of Response | 29.7 | 21.6 - 37.8 | 8.3 | 18.1 | 1.4 | 3.0 | ||||||||||
| Table 12B. Cost to State and Local Respondents to Complete Clean Heavy-Duty Vehicles Grant Program | Estimated Time Required Over Project Lifetime | ||||||||||||||||
| Item # | EPA Form Name | EPA Form Number | Share of Responses | Low End Estimate ($) |
High End Estimate ($) |
Average Estimate ($) |
Range of Cost to Complete ($) |
Application | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | ||||||
| a | CHDV Supplemental Application Template | 5900-689 | 100% | $429 | $480 | $454 | $429 - $480 | $454 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||
| b | CHDV Eligibility and Scrappage Statement | 5900-682 | 100% | $64 | $763 | $413 | $64 - $763 | $64 | $413 | $0 | $0 | ||||||
| c | CHDV Project Reporting Template | 5900-683 | 100% | $719 | $893 | $806 | $719 - $893 | $0 | $534 | $89 | $184 | ||||||
| d | Utility Partnership Agreement | 5900-685 | 10% | $95 | $381 | $238 | $95 - $381 | $95 | $238 | $0 | $0 | ||||||
| e | OTAQ Funding Program Recipient Story Collection Form | TBA | 5% | $95 | $191 | $143 | $95 - $191 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $143 | ||||||
| f | BABA Waiver Request (non-form information collection) | N/A | 57% | $254 | $381 | $318 | $254 - $381 | $0 | $318 | $0 | $0 | ||||||
| g | Total Cost Per Complete Response (a + b + c + d + e + f) |
$2,372 | $1,656 - $3,089 | $613 | $1,503 | $89 | $327 | ||||||||||
| h | Total Cost per Required Response (a + b + c ) |
$1,673 | $1,211 - $2,135 | $518 | $947 | $89 | $184 | ||||||||||
| i | Total Cost of Response using Weighted Average of Share of Respondents Submitting Optional Forms | $1,886 | $527 | $1,152 | $89 | $191 | |||||||||||
| j | Anticipated Number of State and Local Respondents per Year | 96 | 67 | 67 | 67 | ||||||||||||
| k | Total Cost for Program by Stage (i) x (j) |
$50,485 | $77,202 | $5,961 | $12,826 | ||||||||||||
| l | Total Cost for State and Local Respondents (Σ k) |
$146,474 | |||||||||||||||
| Table 12C. Cost to Private Respondents to Complete Clean Heavy-Duty Vehicles Grant Program | Estimated Cost Required Over Project Lifetime | ||||||||||||||||
| Item # | EPA Form Name | EPA Form Number | Share of Responses | Low End Estimate ($) |
High End Estimate ($) |
Average Estimate ($) |
Range of Cost to Complete ($) |
Application | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | ||||||
| a | CHDV Supplemental Application Template | 5900-689 | 100% | $344 | $385 | $364 | $344 - $385 | $364 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||
| b | CHDV Eligibility and Scrappage Statement | 5900-682 | 100% | $51 | $611 | $331 | $51 - $611 | $51 | $331 | $0 | $0 | ||||||
| c | CHDV Project Reporting Template | 5900-683 | 100% | $576 | $716 | $646 | $576 - $716 | $0 | $428 | $71 | $148 | ||||||
| d | Utility Partnership Agreement | 5900-685 | 10% | $76 | $306 | $191 | $76 - $306 | $76 | $191 | $0 | $0 | ||||||
| e | OTAQ Funding Program Recipient Story Collection Form | TBA | 5% | $76 | $153 | $115 | $76 - $153 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $115 | ||||||
| f | BABA Waiver Request (non-form information collection) | N/A | 57% | $204 | $306 | $255 | $204 - $306 | $0 | $255 | $0 | $0 | ||||||
| g | Total Cost Per Complete Response (a + b + c + d + e + f) |
$1,902 | $1,327 - $2,476 | $492 | $1,205 | $71 | $262 | ||||||||||
| h | Total Cost per Required Response (a + b + c ) |
$1,341 | $971 - $1,712 | $415 | $759 | $71 | $148 | ||||||||||
| i | Total Cost of Response using Weighted Average of Share of Respondents Submitting Optional Forms | $1,512 | $423 | $924 | $71 | $153 | |||||||||||
| j | Anticipated Number of Private Respondents per Year | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | ||||||||||||
| k | Total Cost for Program by Stage (i) x (j) |
$1,812 | $2,771 | $214 | $460 | ||||||||||||
| l | Total Cost for Private Respondents (Σ k) |
$5,257 | |||||||||||||||
| Table 13A. Unit Burden for Clean Ports Climate and Air Quality Planning Grants | Estimated Time Required Over Project Lifetime | ||||||||||||||||
| Item # | EPA Form Name | EPA Form Number | Share of Responses | Low End Estimate (hrs.) |
High End Estimate (hrs.) |
Average Estimate (hrs.) |
Range of Time to Complete (hrs.) |
Application | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | ||||||
| a | Clean Ports Supplemental Application Template | 5900-679 | 100% | 2.2 | 6.1 | 4.2 | 2.2 - 6.1 | 4.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||||||
| b | Clean Ports Climate and Air Quality Planning Project Reporting Template | TBA | 100% | 13.0 | 15.0 | 14.0 | 13 - 15 | 0.0 | 6.2 | 2.5 | 5.0 | ||||||
| c | OTAQ Funding Program Recipient Story Collection Form | TBA | 5% | 1.5 | 3.0 | 2.3 | 1.5 - 3 | 0.0 | 2.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||||||
| d | Total Hours per Complete Response (a + b + c) |
20.5 | 16.7 - 24.1 | 4.2 | 8.5 | 2.5 | 5.0 | ||||||||||
| e | Total Hours per Required Response (a + b) |
18.2 | 15.2 - 21.1 | 4.2 | 6.2 | 2.5 | 5.0 | ||||||||||
| f | Weighted Average of Response | 18.3 | 15.3 - 21.2 | 4.2 | 6.3 | 2.5 | 5.0 | ||||||||||
| Table 13B. Cost to State and Local Respondents to Complete Clean Ports Climate and Air Quality Planning Grants | Estimated Cost Required Over Project Lifetime | ||||||||||||||||
| Item # | EPA Form Name | EPA Form Number | Share of Responses | Low End Estimate ($) |
High End Estimate ($) |
Average Estimate ($) |
Range of Cost to Complete ($) |
Application | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | ||||||
| a | Clean Ports Supplemental Application Template | 5900-679 | 100% | $137 | $388 | $267 | $137 - $388 | $267 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||
| b | Clean Ports Climate and Air Quality Planning Project Reporting Template | TBA | 100% | $828 | $952 | $890 | $828 - $952 | $0 | $394 | $159 | $318 | ||||||
| c | OTAQ Funding Program Recipient Story Collection Form | TBA | 5% | $95 | $191 | $143 | $95 - $191 | $0 | $143 | $0 | $0 | ||||||
| d | Total Cost Per Complete Response (a + b + c) |
$1,300 | $1,060 - $1,531 | $267 | $537 | $159 | $318 | ||||||||||
| e | Total Cost per Required Response (a + b ) |
$1,157 | $965 - $1,340 | $267 | $394 | $159 | $318 | ||||||||||
| f | Total Cost of Response using Weighted Average of Share of Respondents Submitting Optional Forms | $1,164 | $267 | $401 | $159 | $318 | |||||||||||
| g | Anticipated Number of State and Local Respondents per Year | 60 | 30 | 30 | 30 | ||||||||||||
| h | Total Cost for Program by Stage (f) x (g) |
$16,014 | $12,035 | $4,766 | $9,532 | ||||||||||||
| i | Total Cost for State and Local Respondents (Σ h) |
$42,347 | |||||||||||||||
| Table 13C. Cost to Private Respondents to Complete Clean Ports Climate and Air Quality Planning Grants | Estimated Cost Required Over Project Lifetime | ||||||||||||||||
| Item # | EPA Form Name | EPA Form Number | Share of Responses | Low End Estimate ($) |
High End Estimate ($) |
Average Estimate ($) |
Range of Cost to Complete ($) |
Application | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | ||||||
| a | Clean Ports Supplemental Application Template | 5900-679 | 100% | $110 | $311 | $214 | $110 - $311 | $214 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||
| b | Clean Ports Climate and Air Quality Planning Project Reporting Template | TBA | 100% | $664 | $763 | $713 | $664 - $764 | $0 | $316 | $127 | $255 | ||||||
| c | OTAQ Funding Program Recipient Story Collection Form | TBA | 5% | $76 | $153 | $115 | $76 - $153 | $0 | $115 | $0 | $0 | ||||||
| d | Total Cost Per Complete Response (a + b + c) |
$1,042 | $850 - $1,227 | $214 | $430 | $127 | $255 | ||||||||||
| e | Total Cost per Required Response (a + b) |
$927 | $774 - $1,074 | $214 | $316 | $127 | $255 | ||||||||||
| f | Total Cost of Response using Weighted Average of Share of Respondents Submitting Optional Forms | $933 | $214 | $322 | $127 | $255 | |||||||||||
| g | Anticipated Number of Private Respondents per Year | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
| h | Total Cost for Program by Stage (f) x (g) |
$0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||
| i | Total Cost for Private Respondents (Σ h) |
$0 | |||||||||||||||
| Table 14A. Unit Burden for Clean Ports Zero Emissions Technology Grants | Estimated Time Required Over Project Lifetime | ||||||||||||||||
| Item # | EPA Form Name | EPA Form Number | Share of Responses | Low End Estimate (hrs.) |
High End Estimate (hrs.) |
Average Estimate (hrs.) |
Range of Time to Complete (hrs.) |
Application | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | |||||
| a | Clean Ports Supplemental Application Template | 5900-679 | 100% | 2.2 | 6.1 | 4.2 | 2.2 - 6.1 | 4.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||
| b | Clean Ports Program Scrappage Evidence Statement | 5900-684 | 100% | 1.5 | 12.0 | 6.8 | 1.5 - 12 | 0.0 | 6.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||
| c | Utility Partnership Agreement | 5900-685 | 50% | 1.5 | 6.0 | 3.8 | 1.5 - 6 | 1.5 | 3.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||
| d | Clean Ports Zero-Emission Technology Project Reporting Template | TBA | 100% | 22.4 | 29.6 | 26.0 | 22.4 - 29.6 | 0.0 | 15.9 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 4.7 | |||||
| e | Clean Ports Program Deployment Evidence Form | TBA | 100% | 1.5 | 12.0 | 6.8 | 1.5 - 12 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 6.8 | |||||
| f | Clean Ports Program Scrappage Eligibility Statement | TBA | 100% | 1.5 | 12.0 | 6.8 | 1.5 - 12 | 0.0 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.7 | |||||
| g | OTAQ Funding Program Recipient Story Collection Form | TBA | 5% | 1.5 | 3.0 | 2.3 | 1.5 - 3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.3 | |||||
| h | BABA Waiver Request (non-form information collection) | N/A | 60% | 4.0 | 6.0 | 5.0 | 4 - 6 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||
| i | Total Hours per Complete Response (a + b + c + d + e + f) |
61.5 | 36.1 - 86.7 | 5.7 | 33.1 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 15.4 | |||||||||
| h | Total Hours per Required Response (a + b + d + e + f ) |
50.5 | 29.1 - 71.7 | 4.2 | 24.4 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 13.1 | |||||||||
| i | Weighted Average of Response | 55.5 | 32.3 - 78.5 | 5.0 | 29.2 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 13.3 | |||||||||
| Table 14B. Cost to State and Local Respondents to Complete Clean Ports Zero Emissions Technology Grants | Estimated Cost Required Over Project Lifetime | ||||||||||||||||
| Item # | EPA Form Name | EPA Form Number | Share of Responses | Low End Estimate ($) |
High End Estimate ($) |
Average Estimate ($) |
Range of Cost to Complete ($) |
Application | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | |||||
| a | Clean Ports Supplemental Application Template | 5900-679 | 100% | $137 | $388 | $267 | $137 - $388 | $267 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
| b | Clean Ports Program Scrappage Evidence Statement | 5900-684 | 100% | $95 | $763 | $429 | $95 - $763 | $0 | $429 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
| c | Utility Partnership Agreement | 5900-685 | 50% | $95 | $381 | $238 | $95 - $381 | $95 | $238 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
| d | Clean Ports Zero-Emission Technology Project Reporting Template | TBA | 100% | $1,426 | $1,882 | $1,654 | $1,426 - $1,882 | $0 | $1,012 | $172 | $172 | $299 | |||||
| e | Clean Ports Program Deployment Evidence Form | TBA | 100% | $95 | $763 | $429 | $95 - $763 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $429 | |||||
| f | Clean Ports Program Scrappage Eligibility Statement | TBA | 100% | $95 | $763 | $429 | $95 - $763 | $0 | $107 | $107 | $107 | $107 | |||||
| g | OTAQ Funding Program Recipient Story Collection Form | TBA | 5% | $95 | $191 | $143 | $95 - $191 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $143 | |||||
| h | BABA Waiver Request (non-form information collection) | N/A | 60% | $254 | $381 | $318 | $254 - $381 | $0 | $318 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
| i | Total Cost Per Complete Response (a + b + c + d + e + f + g + h) |
$3,907 | $2,294 - $5,511 | $362 | $2,105 | $279 | $279 | $978 | |||||||||
| j | Total Cost per Required Response (a + b + d + e + f) |
$3,208 | $1,849 - $4,558 | $267 | $1,548 | $279 | $279 | $835 | |||||||||
| k | Total Cost of Responise using Weighted Average of Share of Respondents Submitting Optional Forms | $3,525 | $315 | $1,858 | $279 | $279 | $842 | ||||||||||
| l | Anticipated Number of State and Local Respondents per Year | 44 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 22 | |||||||||||
| m | Total Cost for Program by Stage (k) x (l) |
$13,841 | $40,882 | $6,134 | $6,134 | $18,524 | |||||||||||
| n | Total Cost for State and Local Respondents (Σ m) |
$85,515 | |||||||||||||||
| Table 14C. Cost to Private Respondents to Complete Clean Ports Zero Emissions Technology Grants | Estimated Cost Required Over Project Lifetime | ||||||||||||||||
| Item # | EPA Form Name | EPA Form Number | Share of Responses | Low End Estimate ($) |
High End Estimate ($) |
Average Estimate ($) |
Range of Cost to Complete ($) |
Application | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | |||||
| a | Clean Ports Supplemental Application Template | 5900-679 | 100% | $110 | $311 | $214 | $110 - $311 | $214 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
| b | Clean Ports Program Scrappage Evidence Statement | 5900-684 | 100% | $76 | $611 | $344 | $76 - $611 | $0 | $344 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
| c | Utility Partnership Agreement | 5900-685 | 50% | $76 | $306 | $191 | $76 - $306 | $76 | $191 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
| d | Clean Ports Zero-Emission Technology Project Reporting Template | TBA | 100% | $1,143 | $1,509 | $1,326 | $1,143 - $1,509 | $0 | $811 | $138 | $138 | $239 | |||||
| e | Clean Ports Program Deployment Evidence Form | TBA | 100% | $76 | $611 | $344 | $76 - $611 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $344 | |||||
| f | Clean Ports Program Scrappage Eligibility Statement | TBA | 100% | $76 | $611 | $344 | $76 - $611 | $0 | $86 | $86 | $86 | $86 | |||||
| g | OTAQ Funding Program Recipient Story Collection Form | TBA | 5% | $76 | $153 | $115 | $76 - $153 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $115 | |||||
| h | BABA Waiver Request (non-form information collection) | N/A | 60% | $204 | $306 | $255 | $204 - $306 | $0 | $255 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
| i | Total Cost Per Complete Response (a + b + c + d + e + f + g + h) |
$3,132 | $1,839 - $4,417 | $290 | $1,687 | $224 | $224 | $784 | |||||||||
| j | Total Cost per Required Response (a + b + d + e + f) |
$2,571 | $1,482 - $3,653 | $214 | $1,241 | $224 | $224 | $669 | |||||||||
| k | Total Cost of Responise using Weighted Average of Share of Respondents Submitting Optional Forms | $2,826 | $252 | $1,490 | $224 | $224 | $675 | ||||||||||
| l | Anticipated Number of Private Respondents per Year | 6 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||
| m | Total Cost for Program by Stage (k) x (l) |
$1,513 | $4,469 | $671 | $671 | $2,025 | |||||||||||
| n | Total Cost for Private Respondents (Σ m) |
$9,348 | |||||||||||||||
| Table 16. Estimated Burden and Cost to the Agency | ||||||||
| Collection Activity1 | Reporting Burden per Response (hours) |
Number of Applications | Number of Responses per Interannual Reporting Period | Number of Interannual Reports Required (e.g., Quarterly = 4; Biannual= 2) | Total Agency Burden Annually (hours) |
Total Agency Cost Annually ($2024) | Total Agency Burden Over the ICR Period | Total Agency Cost Over the ICR Period (2024$) |
| DERA (National, Tribal, and State) Program | 2 | 175 | 112 | 4 | 1,246 | $180,680 | 3,738 | $542,040 |
| Clean School Bus Program | 2 | 200 | 50 | 4 | 800 | $116,006 | 2,400 | $348,019 |
| Clean Heavy-Duty Vehicles Program* | 2 | 0 | 70 | 4 | 560 | $81,204 | 840 | $121,807 |
| Clean Ports Climate and Air Quality Planning Program* | 2 | 0 | 30 | 2 | 120 | $17,401 | 180 | $26,101 |
| Clean Ports Deployment of Zero Emissions Technology Program* | 2 | 0 | 25 | 2 | 100 | $14,501 | 150 | $21,751 |
| TOTAL | 375 | 287 | 2,826 | $409,793 | 7,308 | $1,059,718 | ||
| 1 Time estimate provided by EPA/OTAQ (Tim Thomas) via email on 9/06/2023: We expect that the agency burden will be 2 hours per submission. *Assumes that Clean Heavy-Duty Vehicles and Clean Ports Programs are single-year funding programs, the burden of application review was completed prior to this ICR revision (2024). |
||||||||
| Total Time to Complete by Instrument | ||||||||||||||||||
| # | EPA Form Name | Depreciated Form Name | List of Programs Affected | Applicants or Awardees? | EPA Form Number | Required or Optional | If Optional, share of participants expected to participate | Low End Estimate (h) | High End Estimate (h) | Average Estimate (h) | Weighted Average Time (h) | Range of Time to Complete (hours; Nov 2024 Est.) |
Difference in Burden from Original Estimate (Dec 2023) | Incremental Time to Complete for Application | Incremental Time to Complete in Year 1 (Inclusive of Semi-annual reporting and one-time reporting; using weighted averages for optional forms) |
Incremental Time to Complete in Year 2 (Inclusive of Semi-annual reporting and one-time reporting; using weighted averages for optional forms) |
Incremental Time to Complete in Year 3 (Inclusive of Semi-annual reporting and one-time reporting; using weighted averages for optional forms) |
Incremental Time to Complete in Year 4 (Inclusive of Semi-annual reporting and one-time reporting; using weighted averages for optional forms) |
| 1 | Clean Ports Supplemental Application Template | Clean Ports Supplemental Application Template | Clean Ports Climate and Air Quality Planning Grant Program; Clean Ports Zero Emission Technology Deployment Grant Program |
Applicants | 5900-679 | Required | 100% | 2.2 | 6.1 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 2.2 - 6.1 | 0.0 | 4.2 | - | - | - | - |
| 2 | CSB Supplemental Application Template | CSB Supplemental Application Template | Clean School Bus Grant Program | Applicants | 5900-680 | Required | 100% | 7.2 | 7.6 | 7.4 | 7.4 | 7.2 - 7.6 | -0.1 | 7.4 | - | - | - | - |
| 3 | DERA Supplemental Application Template | DERA Supplemental Application Template | DERA Grant Program | Applicants | 5900-681 | Required | 100% | 5.2 | 7.6 | 6.4 | 6.4 | 5.2 - 7.6 | -2.3 | 6.4 | - | - | - | - |
| 4 | CHDV Eligibility and Scrappage Statement | CHDV Eligibility and Scrappage Statement | Clean Heavy-Duty Vehicles Grant Program | Awardees & Applicants | 5900-682 | Required | 100% | 1.0 | 12.0 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 1 - 12 | 4.5 | 1.0 | 6.5 | - | - | - |
| 5 | CHDV Project Reporting Template | CHDV Project Reporting Template | Clean Heavy-Duty Vehicles Grant Program | Awardees | 5900-683 | Required | 100% | 11.3 | 14.1 | 12.7 | 12.7 | 11.3 - 14.1 | 8.3 | 0.0 | 8.4 | 1.4 | 2.9 | - |
| 6 | Clean Ports Program Scrappage Evidence Statement | TCD Scrappage Statement | Clean Ports Zero Emission Technology Deployment Grant Program | Awardees | 5900-684 | Required | 100% | 1.5 | 12.0 | 6.8 | 6.8 | 1.5 - 12 | 4.8 | 0.0 | 6.8 | - | - | - |
| 7 | Utility Partnership Agreement | TCD Utility Partnership Agreement | Clean Heavy-Duty Vehicles Grant Program; DERA Grant Program; Clean Ports Zero Emission Technology Deployment Grant Program |
Awardees & Applicants | 5900-685 | Optional | 25% | 1.5 | 6.0 | 3.8 | 0.9 | 1.5 - 6 | 1.8 | 1.5 | 3.8 | - | - | - |
| 8 | CSB Eligibility and Scrap Sell Donate Statement | CSB Eligibility and Scrap Sell Donate Statement | Clean School Bus Grant Program | Awardees & Applicants | 5900-686 | Required | 100% | 1.5 | 12.0 | 6.8 | 6.8 | 1.5 - 12 | 4.5 | 1.5 | 6.8 | - | - | - |
| 9 | DERA Eligibility Statement | DERA Eligibility Statement | DERA Grant Program | Awardees & Applicants | 5900-687 | Required | 100% | 1.5 | 12.0 | 6.8 | 6.8 | 1.5 - 12 | 4.8 | 1.5 | 6.8 | - | - | - |
| 10 | DERA Scrappage Statement | DERA Scrappage Statement | DERA Grant Program | Awardees | 5900-688 | Required | 100% | 1.5 | 12.0 | 6.8 | 6.8 | 1.5 - 12 | 4.8 | 0.0 | 6.8 | - | - | - |
| 11 | CHDV Supplemental Application Template | CHDV Supplemental Application Template | Clean Heavy-Duty Vehicles Grant Program | Applicants | 5900-689 | Required | 100% | 6.8 | 7.6 | 7.2 | 7.2 | 6.8 - 7.6 | 0.0 | 7.2 | - | - | - | - |
| 12 | Clean Ports Project Reporting Template* | Clean Ports Project Reporting Template* | Clean Ports Climate and Air Quality Planning Grant Program; Clean Ports Zero Emission Technology Deployment Grant Program | Awardees | 5900-690 | Required | 100% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | - | - | |||||
| 13 | DERA Project Reporting Template | DERA Project Reporting Template | DERA Grant Program | Awardees | 5900-691 | Required | 100% | 12.4 | 15.7 | 14.0 | 14.0 | 12.4 - 15.7 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 7.0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 4 |
| 14 | CSB Project Reporting Template | CSB Project Reporting Template | Clean School Bus Grant Program | Awardees | 5900-692 | Required | 100% | 12.6 | 14.2 | 13.4 | 13.4 | 12.6 - 14.2 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 9.1 | 1.4 | 2.9 | - |
| 15 | CSB Utility Partnership Statement | CSB Utility Partnership Statement | Clean School Bus Grant Program | Awardees & Applicants | 5900-693 | Required | 100% | 1.5 | 6.0 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 1.5 - 6 | 1.8 | 1.5 | 3.8 | - | - | - |
| 16 | Clean Ports Climate and Air Quality Planning Project Reporting Template | Clean Ports Climate and Air Quality Planning Project Reporting Template | Clean Ports Climate and Air Quality Planning Grant Program | Awardees | TBA | Required | 100% | 13.0 | 15.0 | 14.0 | 14.0 | 13 - 15 | 7.2 | 0.0 | 6.2 | 2.5 | 5 | - |
| 17 | Clean Ports Zero-Emission Technology Project Reporting Template | Clean Ports Zero-Emission Technology Project Reporting Template | Clean Ports Zero Emission Technology Deployment Grant Program | Awardees | TBA | Required | 100% | 22.4 | 29.6 | 26.0 | 26.0 | 22.4 - 29.6 | 19.2 | 0.0 | 15.9 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 4.7 |
| 18 | OTAQ Funding Program Recipient Story Collection Form | OTAQ Funding Program Recipient Story Collection Form | Clean Heavy-Duty Vehicles Grant Program; Clean Ports Climate and Air Quality Planning Grant Program; Clean Ports Zero Emission Technology Deployment Grant Program; Clean School Bus Grant Program; DERA Grant Program |
Awardees | TBA | Optional | 10% | 1.5 | 3.0 | 2.3 | 0.2 | 1.5 - 3 | 2.3 | 0.0 | 0.2 | - | - | - |
| 19 | Clean Ports Program Scrappage Eligibility Statement | Clean Ports Program Zero-Emission Technology Deployment Competition Eligibility Statement | Clean Ports Zero Emission Technology Deployment Grant Program | Awardees | TBA | Required | 100% | 1.5 | 12.0 | 6.8 | 6.8 | 1.5 - 12 | 4.8 | 0.0 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.7 |
| 20 | Clean Ports Program Deployment Evidence Form | Clean Ports Program Technology Deployment Evidence Statement | Clean Ports Zero Emission Technology Deployment Grant Program | Awardees | TBA | Required | 100% | 1.5 | 12.0 | 6.8 | 6.8 | 1.5 - 12 | 2.6 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 6.8 |
| 21 | BABA Waiver Request (non-form information collection) | BABA Waiver Request (non-form information collection) | DERA Grant Program | Awardees | N/A | Optional | 9% | 4.0 | 6.0 | 5.0 | 0.4 | 4 - 6 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.4 | - | - | - |
| 22 | BABA Waiver Request (non-form information collection) | BABA Waiver Request (non-form information collection) | Clean School Bus Grant Program; | Awardees | N/A | Optional | 20% | 4.0 | 6.0 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 4 - 6 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - |
| 23 | BABA Waiver Request (non-form information collection) | BABA Waiver Request (non-form information collection) | Clean Heavy-Duty Vehicles Grant Program; | Awardees | N/A | Optional | 57% | 4.0 | 6.0 | 5.0 | 2.9 | 4 - 6 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 2.9 | - | - | - |
| 24 | BABA Waiver Request (non-form information collection) | BABA Waiver Request (non-form information collection) | Clean Ports Zero Emission Technology Deployment Grant Program; | Awardees | N/A | Optional | 60% | 4.0 | 6.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 4 - 6 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - |
| * The Clean Ports Project Reporting Template has been replaced with the Clean Ports Climate and Air Quality Planning Project Reporting Template and the Clean Ports Zero-Emission Technology Deployement Project Reporting Template reflecting program design changes since the initial ICR was developed. † Estimates of share of awardees requesting BABA Waivers provided by Robert Caldwell (OTAQ, 3/19/2025); 40 CHDV, 15 CPP ZE; 10 CSB; and 10 DERA. **Fields in yellow reflect changes in the EPA Form's Name |
||||||||||||||||||
| Sources: | |
| 1 | U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) (2024a). "Employer Costs for Employee Compensation for state and local government workers by occupation and industry group Table3 - June 2024." http://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecec.t03.htm |
| 2 | U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) (2024b). "Employer Costs for Employee Compensation for private industry workers by occupational and industry group Table 4 -June 2024." https://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecec.t04.htm |
| 3 | U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2020). Handbook on Valuing Changes in Time Use Induced by Regulatory Requirements and Other EPA Actions. EPA-236-B-15-001. National Center for Environmental Economics. |
| 4 | U.S. Office of Personnel Management (2024), Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-PA-VA-WV area. Retrieved from https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/salaries-wages/salary-tables/pdf/2024/DCB.pdf |
| File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet |
| File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
| File Created | 0000-00-00 |