OMB Control Number: 0970-0401
Expiration Date: 5/31/2027
New Director Academy Feedback Survey
Overall Event Feedback
Thank you for participating in the National Center on Program Management and Fiscal Operations New Director Academy offered by the UCLA Anderson School of Management. To help ensure the quality of our services, we ask that you complete the following feedback survey. This survey is voluntary, and all feedback will be kept private. To further protect your privacy, please refrain from including personally identifiable information in open-ended responses.
PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT OF 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13) STATEMENT OF PUBLIC BURDEN: The purpose of this information collection is to gather feedback on the delivery of the New Director Academy Event to improve future delivery. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 10 minutes per respondent, including the time for reviewing instructions, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and reviewing the collection of information. This is a voluntary collection of information. agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB # is 0970-0401 and the expiration date is 5/31/2027. If you have any comments on this collection of information, please contact [contact info].
New Director Academy Evaluation – Overall Event Feedback
Q1. Presenter Quality
The presenters were… |
Strongly agree |
Agree |
Disagree |
Strongly disagree |
Don't know / NA |
*a. knowledgeable in the content area(s). |
|
|
|
|
|
*b. effective in communicating key information. |
|
|
|
|
|
*c. responsive to participants’ questions. |
|
|
|
|
|
*d. effective in engaging participants. |
|
|
|
|
|
* Two of these four items will be randomly chosen for each participant using our survey program’s random question generator.
Q2. Resource Quality
The Academy provided me with… |
Strongly agree |
Agree |
Disagree |
Strongly disagree |
Don't know / NA |
*a. resources that were useful for my work. |
|
|
|
|
|
*b. knowledge of available resources. |
|
|
|
|
|
* One of these two items will be randomly chosen for each participant using our survey program’s random question generator.
Q3. Content Quality
The content of the New Director Academy… |
Strongly agree |
Agree |
Disagree |
Strongly disagree |
Don't know / NA |
a. was relevant to my work. |
|
|
|
|
|
b. was free from stereotypes or bias. |
|
|
|
|
|
*c. provided strategies and ideas that will support my work. |
|
|
|
|
|
*d. will help me be more responsive in my work. |
|
|
|
|
|
*One of these two items will be randomly chosen for each participant using our survey program’s random question generator.
Q4. The environment was supportive of learning.
Strongly agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Q5. Regarding the event overall…
|
Yes |
No |
Not sure |
a. The instructors provided feedback to the session participants on the achievement of learning outcomes. |
|
|
|
b. I believe that the stated learning outcomes for this event were met. |
|
|
|
Q6 (Part 1). Program Element Quality
|
Strongly agree |
Agree |
Disagree |
Strongly disagree |
DK / NA |
a. Pod advisors offered helpful guidance. |
|
|
|
|
|
b. TEA sessions helped me envision how the content learned could be applied in my work. |
|
|
|
|
|
c. Sessions offered helped me develop my TAP and identify strategies for achieving those goals. |
|
|
|
|
|
d. The panelists shared valuable insights that will help me as a new director. |
|
|
|
|
|
g. The smaller group format (i.e., break-out groups by region and organizational type) offered a format that was conducive to my learning. |
|
|
|
|
|
Q6 (Part 2). Please elaborate. [Display if disagree or strongly disagree to items in Q6 Part 1].
Q7. Early Learning
As a result of my participation, I feel more confident in my ability to… |
To a large extent |
To a moderate extent |
To a small extent |
Not at all |
Too early to tell |
NA |
a. lead in a multigenerational workplace. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
b. lead using my strengths. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
c. problem solve and manage conflicts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q8. Early Outcomes. Please indicate the extent to which participating in the New Director Academy has impacted you. If it is too early to tell or if the statement is not applicable to you, please check the appropriate circle.
Through the New Director Academy, I… |
To a large extent |
To a moderate extent |
To a small extent |
Not at all |
Too early to tell |
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b. developed an understanding of how different workstyles can help team performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
c. enhanced my knowledge of issues facing Head Start organizations. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
d. better understand my leadership strengths. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
e. broadened my access to a network of leaders and resources within Head Start. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
f. am more confident in my ability as a Head Start director. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
g. Other (please specify): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q9. Overall, how satisfied were you with the New Director Academy?
Very satisfied
Mostly satisfied
Mostly dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
Q10. What did you like most about the New Director Academy?
Q11. Do you have any suggestions to improve the New Director Academy for future cohorts?
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
Author | ENTREPRENEURIAL STUDIES CENTER |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 2024-09-15 |