Appendix B5 Appellant Climate Survey - Web (English)

OMHA Annual Appellant Climate Survey

Appendix B5 Appellant Climate Survey - Web (English)

OMB: 0990-0330

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf















Appendix B5.
Appellant Climate Survey-Web

English

Instructions

Click the response that most closely describes your answer to each question. If you do not have an answer, you may leave it blank.

In the questions that follow, “OMHA” refers to the Office of Medicare Hearings and Appeals.

Section I. Hearings History

1. Approximately how many OMHA hearings have you participated in during the last 12 months?

0

  • 1

2 to 10

More than 10


Please respond to the survey questions based on your most recent hearing experience with OMHA over the last 12 months.


When answering these questions, think of the last hearing you participated in, which we show as [date] in the [field office]. Is that correct? [IF NO, THEN ASK]


2a. Approximately when was the last hearing you participated in? Month ______ Year _____


2b. Do you recall the office that heard this case?

Albuquerque

Arlington

Atlanta

Cleveland

Denver

Irvine

Kansas City

Miami

New Orleans

Phoenix

Seattle


3. Which of the following best describes your relationship to the appellant?

The appellant

Employee of the appellant

Appellant’s authorized or appointed representative

Other. Please specify:



According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 0990-0330. The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average 11 minutes per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data resources, gather the data needed, and complete and review the information collection. If you have comments concerning the accuracy of the time estimate(s) or suggestions for improving this form, please write to: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, OS/OCIO/PRA, 200 Independence Ave. SW, Suite 537-H, Washington DC 20201, Attention: PRA Reports Clearance Officer.

Section II. Overall Experience

4. Independent of the judges decision, to what extent do you think you were given the opportunity to have your case fully heard and considered?

Very great extent

Great extent

Some extent

Very little extent

Not heard and considered at all


5. Next, think about the entire process of working with OMHA, from requesting a hearing up to receiving a final decision. Regardless of the outcome of that decision, how satisfied were you with the process of working with OMHA overall?

Very satisfied

Satisfied

Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied

Dissatisfied

Very dissatisfied

6. How satisfied were you with the professionalism of OMHA staff when they assisted you with the hearing process?

Very satisfied

Satisfied

Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied

Dissatisfied

Very dissatisfied

Section III. Hard Copy, Internet, and Phone Information


You may have received some documents during the appeals process.


7a. [SKIP IF NON-BENEFICIARY] First, is the Notice of Nondiscrimination (Form OMHA – 001). This document included instructions in a variety of languages on how to obtain free aid and services for people with disabilities and how to obtain free language services. Did you receive this document?

Yes

No



7b. The [next document] /[first document] is the Index of the Administrative Record (Form-156) or Exhibit List. How satisfied were you with how clearly it listed all the documents admitted to the administrative record and was organized?

Very satisfied

Satisfied

Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied

Dissatisfied

Very dissatisfied

Didn’t receive


8. Have you used the online Administrative Law Judge Appeal Status Information System, or AASIS? This feature of the OMHA website allows you to look up the status of appeals you have filed with OMHA.

Yes

No [skip to q10]


9. How satisfied are you with AASIS’s capability to provide accurate updates on your appeal?

Shape1

Very satisfied

Shape2

[SKIP TO Q11A]

Satisfied

Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied

Dissatisfied

Very dissatisfied



10. [If answer to Q9=d or e, then ask] Why were you dissatisfied?






[GO TO Q11A]



Shape3

11. Have you accessed OMHA’s website?

Shape4

[SKIP TO Q12]

 No, I did not try

No, I do not have access to a computer and/or the Internet

No, I tried to but could not find it

Yes



11A. What suggestions do you have for improving the OMHA website?





12. Did you ever use the beneficiary or national toll-free helplines to contact OMHA?

Yes [GO TO Q13]

No [GO TO Q14]


13. How satisfied were you with the customer service provided by OMHA through the toll-free helpline?

Very satisfied

Satisfied

Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied

Dissatisfied

Very dissatisfied


Section IV. Experience Scheduling Your Hearing


14. There were four different phases of the scheduling process (listed below), starting with your initial request for a hearing, up to when you actually participated in the hearing and received the Judge’s decision. Please rate your level of satisfaction with each phase.


Phases of the Scheduling Process

Very Satisfied

Satisfied

Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied

Dissatisfied

Very Dissatisfied

The timeframe between filing your request for a hearing and when you were notified that your case had been assigned to a Judge

The amount of time you waited after the appeal was assigned until your hearing was scheduled

The timeframe after the hearing was scheduled but before it was held

The timeframe between the hearing and receiving a decision


15. Overall, how satisfied were you with the entire process to schedule the Judge’s hearing(s)?

Shape6 Shape5

Skip to q17

Very satisfied

Satisfied

Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied

Dissatisfied

Very dissatisfied

16. Please explain why you were dissatisfied in the space provided below.





17. After your hearing was scheduled, was it ever rescheduled?

Yes [skip to Q18A]

No [SKIP TO Q19]


18A. Did you request the hearing to be rescheduled or did the Judge change the time and/or place of the hearing.

You requested a rescheduling of the hearing.

The Judge changed the time and/or place of the originally scheduled hearing.

Both parties requested the hearing be rescheduled and/or change in time and/or place at least one time


18B. How satisfied were you with the rescheduling process?

Very satisfied

Satisfied

Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied

Dissatisfied

Very dissatisfied


Section V. Interaction with OMHA Between Scheduling and Hearing

19. Did you have any interaction with OMHA staff after the hearing was scheduled, but before the hearing was conducted?

Yes

No [skip to Q23]

20. What was the purpose of the interaction between you and OMHA staff [please check all that apply]?

a. Submit evidence or other documents

b. Request a copy of the administrative record

c. Discuss procedural matters

d. Get general questions about the hearing process answered

e. Other. Please specify:



21. During the period after the hearing was scheduled but before it was held, how satisfied were you with your interaction with OMHA staff overall?

Very satisfied

Satisfied

Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied

Dissatisfied

Very dissatisfied



22. Please explain why your interaction was less than helpful in the space provided below.





Section VI. Telephone Hearing

Next are questions about your telephone hearing.



23. Overall, how satisfied were you with the use of the telephone to conduct your hearing(s)?

Shape9

Shape8

Skip to Q25

Very satisfied

Satisfied

Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied

Dissatisfied

Very dissatisfied


24. Please explain why you were dissatisfied in the space provided below.



Section VII. Final Questions


25. Regardless of the Judges decision, how satisfied were you with the interaction you had with the Judge?

Very satisfied

Satisfied

Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied

Dissatisfied

Very dissatisfied


26. Regardless of the judges decision, how satisfied were you with how clearly the decision explained the final outcome and reasoning behind the Judge’s decision?

Very satisfied

Satisfied

Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied

Dissatisfied

Very dissatisfied


27. Regardless of the Judge’s decisions, please respond to the following statements about the Judge during your hearing(s) experience.



Always


Often

Some-

times


Never

a. The Judge clearly stated the relevant issue(s) in my case(s).

b. The Judge was professional.

c. The Judge was an effective listener.

d. The Judge was prepared.

e. The Judge conducted an orderly hearing(s).


28. Based on your experience with the OMHA appeals process, do you have any suggestions for improvement?










Section VIII. Final Questions for Non-Beneficiaries Only

As part of a broader effort to improve the Medicare appeals process, OMHA has offered alternative methods instead of the hearing process to seek review of appeals. The next questions describe one of OMHA’s Special Initiatives.


29. OMHA’s Settlement Conference Facilitation (SCF) program is an alternative dispute resolution process at OMHA that gives certain providers and suppliers an opportunity to resolve their eligible Part A and Part B appeals through mediation with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Are you aware of this program?

Yes

No [skip to Closing Statement]


30. Have you participated in the Settlement Conference Facilitation program?

Yes

No [skip to Closing Statement]


31. How satisfied were you with your settlement conference facilitation experience?

Very satisfied

Satisfied

Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied

Dissatisfied

Very dissatisfied




Thank you for taking the time to respond to this survey. If you would like to make a comment about this survey or confirm that it meets the necessary requirements as a valid information collection tool under the Paperwork Reduction Act, please contact the OMHA Survey Team at 1-866-207-4466.






File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
File TitleFilter questions for VTC, telephone, in-person
AuthorPaul Ruggiere, PhD
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-08-02

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy