Supporting Statement Part A - 2020 NRC-FLAS extension_rvsd eqb

Tracking and OMB Number: (XX) 1840-0807

Revised: XX/XX/XXXX

SUPPORTING STATEMENT

FOR PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT SUBMISSION

1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary. What is the purpose for this information collection? Identify any legal or administrative requirements that necessitate the collection. Include a citation that authorizes the collection of information. Specify the review type of the collection (new, revision, extension, reinstatement with change, reinstatement without change). If revised, briefly specify the changes. If a rulemaking is involved, list the sections with a brief description of the information collection requirement, and/or changes to sections, if applicable.

This information collection (OMB 1840-0807) includes application instructions and forms for the National Resource Centers (NRC) Program (CFDA Number 84.015A) and the Foreign Language and Area Studies (FLAS) Fellowships Program (CFDA Number 84.015B), authorized under Title VI of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (20 U.S.C. Section 1122). The type of collection is an extension of the previously-approved information collection (application).

The NRC Program provides grants to institutions of higher education (IHE) or consortia of IHEs to establish, strengthen, and operate comprehensive and undergraduate foreign language and area or international studies centers. These centers serve as centers of excellence for world language training and teaching, research, and instruction in fields needed to provide full understanding of areas, regions, or countries where the languages are commonly used.

The FLAS Fellowship Program awards allocations of fellowships, through institutions of higher education, to meritorious students enrolled in programs that offer performance-based instruction in world languages in combination with area studies, international studies, or the international aspects of professional studies.

Together, these programs respond to the ongoing national need for individuals with expertise and competence in world languages and area or international studies; advance national security by developing a pipeline of highly proficient linguists and experts in critical world regions; and contribute to developing a globally competent workforce able to engage with a multilingual/multicultural clientele at home and abroad.

Approval of this collection is necessary in order to conduct fiscal year (FY) 2022 program competitions.

No rulemaking is involved.

The legislation and program regulations for the NRC and FLAS Programs may be viewed at:

https://www2.ed.gov/programs/iegpsnrc/legislation.html

https://www2.ed.gov/programs/iegpsflasf/legislation.html

Additional regulations that are applicable to this collection include the Government Performance and Results Act, section 427 of the General Education Provisions Act, the Government Paperwork Elimination Act, and the Education Department General Administrative Regulations.

• Government Performance and Results Act

https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/senate-bill/00020
https://www.congress.gov/111/plaws/publ352/PLAW-111publ352.pdf

• Section 427 of the General Provisions Act

https://sites.ed.gov/idea/files/Grants-General-Education-Provisions-Act-Section-427.pdf

• Government Paperwork Elimination Act

http://www2.ed.gov/policy/gen/leg/gpea/index.html

• Education Department General Administrative Regulations

http://www2.ed.gov/policy/fund/reg/edgarReg/edgar.html

2. Indicate how, by whom, and for what purpose the information is to be used. Except for a new collection, indicate the actual use the agency has made of the information received from the current collection.

Eligible institutions of higher education use the approved information collection to prepare and submit grant applications in response to the notice inviting applications. Peer review panels use the selection criteria in the information collection to evaluate applications. Department officials take the peer reviewers evaluations into consideration when making funding recommendations. The information will also be used as a basis for project monitoring and performance reporting, among other grant administration activities.

OPE/IFLE has used the information received for the current collection to develop technical assistance materials for grantees, such as program administration manuals and technical assistance Webinars, to inform the performance reporting requirements for these programs, and to demonstrate the impact of these programs.

3. Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or forms of information technology, e.g. permitting electronic submission of responses, and the basis for the decision of adopting this means of collection. Please identify systems or websites used to electronically collect this information. Also describe any consideration given to using technology to reduce burden. If there is an increase or decrease in burden related to using technology (e.g. using an electronic form, system or website from paper), please explain in number 12.

The electronic submission of NRC and FLAS applications is currently not a viable option for these programs, despite our ongoing efforts to transition from a hard copy (upload through Grants.gov) application process to a fully integrated electronic submission application process. The Department’s G5 system is not designed to support the submission and the peer review of joint NRC and FLAS applications. For FY 2022, applicants will submit applications by uploading documents through Grants.gov.

We have implemented the electronic peer review of the submitted applications, however, which has greatly reduced the burden hours for evaluating applications. For FY 2022, peer reviewers will access electronic versions of the NRC/FLAS technical review forms via IFLE’s International Resource Information System (IRIS) site to record their scores and comments.

4. Describe efforts to identify duplication. Show specifically why any similar information already available cannot be used or modified for use for the purposes described in Item 2 above.

There is no duplication of information. The information collected in this application package is otherwise unavailable.

5. If the collection of information impacts small businesses or other small entities, describe any methods used to minimize burden. A small entity may be (1) a small business which is deemed to be one that is independently owned and operated and that is not dominant in its field of operation; (2) a small organization that is any not-for-profit enterprise that is independently owned and operated and is not dominant in its field; or (3) a small government jurisdiction, which is a government of a city, county, town, township, school district, or special district with a population of less than 50,000.
   
   

This collection does not impact small businesses or entities.

6. Describe the consequences to Federal program or policy activities if the collection is not conducted or is conducted less frequently, as well as any technical or legal obstacles to reducing burden.

If the collection is not approved, we will not be able to conduct the competition for these programs.

The information that OPE/IFLE is requesting via this information collection is as minimal as possible in order to reduce burden on applicants while simultaneously collecting what is sufficient and necessary to ensure that all grant activities are conducted successfully, and that the recommended projects are of high quality, to the greatest extent possible. Grant activities include the publication of the competition notice, technical assistance to applicants, the peer review of applications, preparation of funding slates for transmittal to ED officials for review and approval, Congressional notifications, and making the grant awards in accordance with our approved schedules.

7. Explain any special circumstances that would cause an information collection to be conducted in a manner:

• requiring respondents to report information to the agency more often than quarterly;

• requiring respondents to prepare a written response to a collection of information in fewer than 30 days after receipt of it;

• requiring respondents to submit more than an original and two copies of any document;

• requiring respondents to retain records, other than health, medical, government contract, grant-in-aid, or tax records for more than three years;

• in connection with a statistical survey, that is not designed to produce valid and reliable results than can be generalized to the universe of study;

• requiring the use of a statistical data classification that has not been reviewed and approved by OMB;

• that includes a pledge of confidentiality that is not supported by authority established in statute or regulation, that is not supported by disclosure and data security policies that are consistent with the pledge, or that unnecessarily impedes sharing of data with other agencies for compatible confidential use; or

• requiring respondents to submit proprietary trade secrets, or other confidential information unless the agency can demonstrate that it has instituted procedures to protect the information’s confidentiality to the extent permitted by law.

There are no special circumstances that require the information to be collected in the ways described.

8. As applicable, state that the Department has published the 60 and 30 Federal Register notices as required by 5 CFR 1320.8(d), soliciting comments on the information collection prior to submission to OMB.

Include a citation for the 60 day comment period (e.g. Vol. 84 FR ##### and the date of publication). Summarize public comments received in response to the 60 day notice and describe actions taken by the agency in response to these comments. Specifically address comments received on cost and hour burden. If only non-substantive comments are provided, please provide a statement to that effect and that it did not relate or warrant any changes to this information collection request. In your comments, please also indicate the number of public comments received.

For the 30 day notice, indicate that a notice will be published.

Describe efforts to consult with persons outside the agency to obtain their views on the availability of data, frequency of collection, the clarity of instruction and record keeping, disclosure, or reporting format (if any), and on the data elements to be recorded, disclosed, or reported.

Consultation with representatives of those from whom information is to be obtained or those who must compile records should occur at least once every 3 years – even if the collection of information activity is the same as in prior periods. There may be circumstances that may preclude consultation in a specific situation. These circumstances should be explained.

The Department will publish a minimum 30-day Federal Register notice as required.

Nine grantees were consulted by IFLE staff in an effort to collect accurate estimates of hour burden. Estimates ranged between 100 and 123 hours.

8. Explain any decision to provide any payment or gift to respondents, other than remuneration of contractors or grantees with meaningful justification.

No payments or gifts are made to respondents.

8. Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for the assurance in statute, regulation, or agency policy. If personally identifiable information (PII) is being collected, a Privacy Act statement should be included on the instrument. Please provide a citation for the Systems of Record Notice and the date a Privacy Impact Assessment was completed as indicated on the IC Data Form. A confidentiality statement with a legal citation that authorizes the pledge of confidentiality should be provided.¹ If the collection is subject to the Privacy Act, the Privacy Act statement is deemed sufficient with respect to confidentiality. If there is no expectation of confidentiality, simply state that the Department makes no pledge about the confidentiality of the data. If no PII will be collected, state that no assurance of confidentiality is provided to respondents. If the Paperwork Burden Statement is not included physically on a form, you may include it here. Please ensure that your response per respondent matches the estimate provided in number 12.

A Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) was last conducted in 1999. The System of Records Notice (SORN) was published June 4, 1999 in Vol. 64 No. 107 of the Federal Register. The Department makes no pledge about the confidentiality of the data.

8. Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature, such as sexual behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and other matters that are commonly considered private. The justification should include the reasons why the agency considers the questions necessary, the specific uses to be made of the information, the explanation to be given to persons from whom the information is requested, and any steps to be taken to obtain their consent.

No questions of a sensitive nature are asked.

8. Provide estimates of the hour burden for this current information collection request. The statement should:

• Provide an explanation of how the burden was estimated, including identification of burden type: recordkeeping, reporting or third party disclosure. Address changes in burden due to the use of technology (if applicable). Generally, estimates should not include burden hours for customary and usual business practices.

• Please do not include increases in burden and respondents numerically in this table. Explain these changes in number 15.

• Indicate the number of respondents by affected public type (federal government, individuals or households, private sector – businesses or other for-profit, private sector – not-for-profit institutions, farms, state, local or tribal governments), frequency of response, annual hour burden. Unless directed to do so, agencies should not conduct special surveys to obtain information on which to base hour burden estimates. Consultation with a sample (fewer than 10) of potential respondents is desirable.

• If this request for approval covers more than one form, provide separate hour burden estimates for each form and aggregate the hour burden in the table below.

• Provide estimates of annualized cost to respondents of the hour burdens for collections of information, identifying and using appropriate wage rate categories. Use this site to research the appropriate wage rate. The cost of contracting out or paying outside parties for information collection activities should not be included here. Instead, this cost should be included in Item 14. If there is no cost to respondents, indicate by entering 0 in the chart below and/or provide a statement.

Nine former grantees were consulted by IFLE staff in an effort to collect accurate estimates of hour burden. Estimates ranged between 100 and 123 hours. The average estimated time per response is 105 hours.

Recordkeeping:	0
Reporting:	105
Third-Party Disclosure:	0
Estimated Hour Burden per Response:	105

We expect approximately 165 respondents from institutions of higher education. The estimated total hour burden for all respondents is 17,325.

Respondents	165
Frequency	Once (every four years)
Estimated Hour Burden	105 per response
165 x 1 x 105 =	17,325

Provide a descriptive narrative here in addition to completing the table below with burden hour estimates.

Estimated Annual Burden and Respondent Costs Table

Information Activity or IC (with type of respondent)	Sample Size (if applicable)	Respondent Response Rate (if applicable)	Number of Respondents	Number of Responses	Average Burden Hours per Response	Total Annual Burden Hours	Estimated Respondent Average Hourly Wage	Total Annual Costs (hourly wage x total burden hours)
Recordkeeping			0	0	0	0
Reporting			165	165	105	17,325
Third-Party Disclosure			0	0	0	0
Annualized Totals			165	165	105	17,325		x

Please ensure the annual total burden, respondents and response match those entered in IC Data Parts 1 and 2, and the response per respondent matches the Paperwork Burden Statement that must be included on all forms.

8. Provide an estimate of the total annual cost burden to respondents or record keepers resulting from the collection of information. (Do not include the cost of any hour burden shown in Items 12 and 14.)

• The cost estimate should be split into two components: (a) a total capital and start-up cost component (annualized over its expected useful life); and (b) a total operation and maintenance and purchase of services component. The estimates should take into account costs associated with generating, maintaining, and disclosing or providing the information. Include descriptions of methods used to estimate major cost factors including system and technology acquisition, expected useful life of capital equipment, the discount rate(s), and the time period over which costs will be incurred. Capital and start-up costs include, among other items, preparations for collecting information such as purchasing computers and software; monitoring, sampling, drilling and testing equipment; and acquiring and maintaining record storage facilities.

• If cost estimates are expected to vary widely, agencies should present ranges of cost burdens and explain the reasons for the variance. The cost of contracting out information collection services should be a part of this cost burden estimate. In developing cost burden estimates, agencies may consult with a sample of respondents (fewer than 10), utilize the 60-day pre-OMB submission public comment process and use existing economic or regulatory impact analysis associated with the rulemaking containing the information collection, as appropriate.

• Generally, estimates should not include purchases of equipment or services, or portions thereof, made: (1) prior to October 1, 1995, (2) to achieve regulatory compliance with requirements not associated with the information collection, (3) for reasons other than to provide information or keep records for the government or (4) as part of customary and usual business or private practices. Also, these estimates should not include the hourly costs (i.e., the monetization of the hours) captured above in Item 12.

Total Annualized Capital/Startup Cost : $0.00

Total Annual Costs (O&M) : $0.00

Total Annualized Costs Requested : $0.00

8. Provide estimates of annualized cost to the Federal government. Also, provide a description of the method used to estimate cost, which should include quantification of hours, operational expenses (such as equipment, overhead, printing, and support staff), and any other expense that would not have been incurred without this collection of information. Agencies also may aggregate cost estimates from Items 12, 13, and 14 in a single table.

Operational or Programmatic Task	Wage per Hour	Staff Resources	Total	Cost to Federal Government
			Hours
Gather data and develop OMB justification statement	$65	1	30	$1,950
Develop application forms and instructions	$65	1	60	$3,900
Develop and seek approval to publish Notice Inviting Applications; develop competition technical review plan	$65	1	60	$3,900
Make available (post) application instructions on ED’s Website	$50	1	27	$1,350
Process 165 hard copy applications ED Application Control Center support staff (date stamp applications, mail receipt acknowledgements, assign PR award numbers, input data into G5, transfer hard copy applications to OPE/IFLE)	$50	1	120	$6,000
Establish reader panels to evaluate applications on the IRIS site	$50	4	8	$1,600
Contractual support for electronic peer review (application screening, put the technical review form (TRF) on the IRIS site, provide technical support, pay peer reviewers, send TRFs to all applicants post-competition )				$5,300
Conduct peer review conference calls; monitor panels via e-mails; check reviewers’ comments scorfes for accuracy and compliance during a two-week panel review	$50	5	80	$20,000
Develop NRC slate memo and FLAS slate memo and attachments	$50	2	18	$1,800
Review recommended applications and revised budgets	$50	4	80	$16,000
Enter NRC slate and FLAS slate information into G5 and obligate awards	$50	2	20	$2,000
Four program officers document monitoring activities weekly for 10 projects in their respective world area portfolios in compliance with OPE standards	$50	4	104 (2 hrs./wk. @ 52 weeks)	$20,800
TOTAL			607	84,600

8. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments. Generally, adjustments in burden result from re-estimating burden and/or from economic phenomenon outside of an agency’s control (e.g., correcting a burden estimate or an organic increase in the size of the reporting universe). Program changes result from a deliberate action that materially changes a collection of information and generally are result of new statute or an agency action (e.g., changing a form, revising regulations, redefining the respondent universe, etc.). Burden changes should be disaggregated by type of change (i.e., adjustment, program change due to new statute, and/or program change due to agency discretion), type of collection (new, revision, extension, reinstatement with change, reinstatement without change) and include totals for changes in burden hours, responses and costs (if applicable).

The type of collection is an extension. There is no adjustment in the estimated respondent burden of 105 hours per response.

Provide a descriptive narrative for the reasons of any change in addition to completing the table with the burden hour change(s) here.

	Program Change Due to New Statute	Program Change Due to Agency Discretion	Change Due to Adjustment in Agency Estimate
Total Burden	0	0	0
Total Responses	0	0	0
Total Costs (if applicable)	0	0	0

8. For collections of information whose results will be published, outline plans for tabulation and publication. Address any complex analytical techniques that will be used. Provide the time schedule for the entire project, including beginning and ending dates of the collection of information, completion of report, publication dates, and other actions.

The results of the collection will not be published.

8. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of the information collection, explain the reasons that display would be inappropriate.

We will display the expiration date as required.

8. Explain each exception to the certification statement identified in the Certification of Paperwork Reduction Act.

There are no exceptions to the certification statement.

1 Requests for this information are in accordance with the following ED and OMB policies: Privacy Act of 1974, OMB Circular A-108 – Privacy Act Implementation – Guidelines and Responsibilities, OMB Circular A-130 Appendix I – Federal Agency Responsibilities for Maintaining Records About Individuals, OMB M-03-22 – OMB Guidance for Implementing the Privacy Provisions of the E-Government Act of 2002, OMB M-06-15 – Safeguarding Personally Identifiable Information, OM:6-104 – Privacy Act of 1974 (Collection, Use and Protection of Personally Identifiable Information)

10