T ITLE OF INFORMATION COLLECTION: Feedback on the Center for Scientific Review’s (CSR) 2020 Integrity in Peer Review Training.
PURPOSE: NIH depends on CSRs’ peer review process to ensure that all NIH grant applications receive fair, independent, expert, and timely reviews that are free from inappropriate influences. A critical element in achieving this quality of peer review is to educate reviewers on the importance of upholding the highest standards of integrity in the NIH peer review process. Maintaining integrity in the peer review process--including confidentiality and security-- is essential for exchanging scientific opinions and evaluations without fear of reprisal; protecting trade secrets or other proprietary, sensitive and/or confidential information; and providing reliable input to the agency about research projects to support. In addition, maintaining integrity in the peer review process is important for maintaining public trust in science. The Center for Scientific Review (CSR) has expended considerable effort in creating and distributing an online training presentation on integrity in peer review to help educate reviewers on how to maintain integrity in the NIH peer review process as well as the consequences for violations of integrity.
CSR proposes to conduct a survey to understand the effectiveness of the training and reviewer’s general satisfaction with the training. Information collected from the survey will help refine and improve the quality of future CSR trainings on integrity in peer review.
DESCRIPTION OF RESPONDENTS: Respondents will be approximately 10,000 NIH CSR grant reviewers who are participating in reviews for the May 2020 council round. Most of these individuals are research scientists who work at academic universities across the U.S.
TYPE OF COLLECTION: (Check one)
[ ] Customer Comment Card/Complaint Form [X] Customer Satisfaction Survey
[ ] Usability Testing (e.g., Website or Software [ ] Small Discussion Group
[ ] Focus Group [ ] Other: ______________________
CERTIFICATION:
I certify the following to be true:
The collection is voluntary.
The collection is low-burden for respondents and low-cost for the Federal Government.
The collection is non-controversial and does not raise issues of concern to other federal agencies.
The results are not intended to be disseminated to the public.
Information gathered will not be used for the purpose of substantially informing influential policy decisions.
The collection is targeted to the solicitation of opinions from respondents who have experience with the program or may have experience with the program in the future.
Name: Hope Cummings________________________________________________
To assist review, please provide answers to the following question:
Personally Identifiable Information:
Is personally identifiable information (PII) collected? [ ] Yes [X] No
If Yes, is the information that will be collected included in records that are subject to the Privacy Act of 1974? [ ] Yes [ ] No
If Applicable, has a System or Records Notice been published? [ ] Yes [ ] No
Gifts or Payments:
Is an incentive (e.g., money or reimbursement of expenses, token of appreciation) provided to participants? [ ] Yes [X] No
ESTIMATED BURDEN HOURS and COSTS
Category of Respondent |
No. of Respondents |
No. of Responses per Respondent |
Time per Response (in hours) |
Total Burden Hours |
Individuals |
10,000 |
1 |
5/60 |
833 |
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
10,000 |
|
833 |
Category of Respondent
|
Total Burden Hours |
Hourly Wage Rate* |
Total Burden Cost |
Individuals |
833 |
$36.62 |
$30,504.46 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
$30,504.46 |
*The wage rate was obtained from https://www.bls.gov/oes/2018/may/oes_nat.htm#19-0000
FEDERAL COST: The estimated annual cost to the Federal government is 2,668.94
Staff |
Grade/Step |
Salary* |
% of Effort |
Fringe (if applicable) |
Total Cost to Gov’t |
Federal Oversight |
|
|
|
|
|
Health Scientist Administrator |
GS-14/4 |
133,447 |
2% |
|
2,668.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractor Cost |
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Travel |
|
|
|
|
N/A |
Other Cost |
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
2,668.94 |
*the Salary in table above is cited from https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/salaries-wages/salary-tables/pdf/2020/DCB.pdf
If you are conducting a focus group, survey, or plan to employ statistical methods, please provide answers to the following questions:
The selection of your targeted respondents
Do you have a customer list or something similar that defines the universe of potential respondents and do you have a sampling plan for selecting from this universe? [X] Yes [ ] No
If the answer is yes, please provide a description of both below (or attach the sampling plan)? If the answer is no, please provide a description of how you plan to identify your potential group of respondents and how you will select them?
The customer list will consist of all individuals who will serve as CSR reviewers for the May 2020 council round. The review meeting roster will be used as the participant list. Most of these individuals are research scientists who work at academic universities across the U.S.
Administration of the Instrument
How will you collect the information? (Check all that apply)
[X] Web-based or other forms of Social Media
[ ] Telephone
[ ] In-person
[ ] Other, Explain
Will interviewers or facilitators be used? [ ] Yes [X] No
Please make sure that all instruments, instructions, and scripts are submitted with the request.
File Type | application/msword |
File Title | Generic Clearance Submission Template |
Subject | Generic Clearance Submission Template |
Author | OD/USER |
Last Modified By | SYSTEM |
File Modified | 2020-01-08 |
File Created | 2020-01-08 |