Appendix V
CFSAN/Biotech
Spec Concepts for Focus Groups
Regulatory Process v5
Headline: The Federal government– EPA, FDA, and USDA – ensures that genetically
modified crops are safe and that people, food, the environment, and animals are
protected.
To ensure safety:
• Government expert scientists keep up with research to make sure they have the most recent information on whether a GM product could affect humans, food, the environment, nearby crops, or animals.
• The opinion of independent academic scientists on how government experts should evaluate GM products is considered.
• All the public comments, and information about scientific reviews, recommendations and conclusions by government and independent scientific experts is available for the public to see.
• The public can participate in the federal oversight process by providing scientific information to regulators.
• All developers in the farm to table chain have a legal duty to market safe foods, regardless of the process by which the food is created. FDA offers a voluntary premarket consultation program for GMO plant food developers to help them meet their legal obligations.
• GM crops that raise environmental safety questions are monitored in controlled field testing to ensure they are safe, before the crop can be put into large scale commercial use.
• When warranted, parts of government continue oversight of certain GM products even after they are put into large scale commercial use.
*Draft educational messages developed for research purposes only. Not for public dissemination.
Appendix V
CFSAN/Biotech
Spec Concepts for Focus Groups
Views, v3
Headline: What are some of the views in the GMO discussion?
Copy:
One view might say… |
Another view might say… |
Here is some scientific context… |
|
Bioengineered (BE) food is just an advancement on traditional breeding techniques. |
Foods were not developed using laboratory-based methods until bioengineered (BE) food came along. |
Laboratory methods were used to produce new food varieties well before the advent of bioengineered (BE) food. Some traditional breeding methods rely on laboratory-based techniques. Production of BE food relies on both new methods as well as traditional breeding techniques. |
|
Companies perform safety studies on GMOs prior to marketing to ensure that they are safe. |
The companies that make the GMO seeds are the ones verifying their safety |
The companies that develop the GMOs are responsible for doing studies on the safety of GMOs. Governments have the responsibility of evaluating the studies. |
|
Foods from GMOs currently on the market are safe. |
There are questions about the safety of foods from GMOs currently on the market. |
FDA has found the foods from GMOs it has evaluated are safe and lawful. A 2016 National Academies of Science panel found that there is no higher danger to human health from eating foods from GMOs than from other foods. |
|
BE foods are only developed by large companies. |
BE foods can be developed by large companies, as well as smaller entities (small companies or universities). |
While many BE foods have been developed by larger companies, some BE foods have been developed by smaller entities. An example of such a crop is a bioengineered papaya grown in Hawaii that was developed by university scientists. |
|
*Draft educational messages developed for research purposes only. Not for public dissemination.
Appendix V
CFSAN/Biotech
Spec Concepts for Focus Groups
Different Voices, v3
Headline: Agricultural biotechnology. It means something different to everyone.
Copy:
Iowa Corn Farmer: With agricultural biotech, my seeds cost more but I still have higher profits because I lose less to pests.
Government Official: Around agricultural biotechnology products and processes, the review and vetting process is appropriate to ensure the safety of people, animals, crops and the environment.
Mother of Three: I don’t know a lot about the health implications of biotech foods and the information is confusing. Why can’t farmers grow foods the old-fashioned way, when no one had any questions about how safe their foods were?
Academic Scientist: The science around agricultural biotechnology is solid. There is a lot of evidence to consider, and it all points to agricultural biotechnology being safely used and having tremendous potential benefits.
*Draft educational messages developed for research purposes only. Not for public dissemination.
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
Author | Cecily Naron |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 2021-01-21 |