PRA Supporting Statement 01-05-16

PRA Supporting Statement 01-05-16.doc

Campus Equity in Athletics Disclosure Act (EADA) Survey

OMB: 1840-0827

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf

EDICS Tracking and OMB Number: 1840-0827 Revised: 1/11/16



SUPPORTING STATEMENT

FOR PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT SUBMISSION





A. Justification



1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary. Identify any legal or administrative requirements that necessitate the collection. Attach a hard copy of the appropriate section of each statute and regulation mandating or authorizing the collection of information, or you may provide a valid URL link or paste the applicable section1. Specify the review type of the collection (new, revision, extension, reinstatement with change, reinstatement without change). If revised, briefly specify the changes. If a rulemaking is involved, make note of the sections or changed sections, if applicable.

The purpose of this submission is to extend the previously approved collection for the Equity in Athletics Disclosure Act (EADA), found in section 485 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (HEA), as amended. The statute (20 U.S.C. 1092(e)), and its implementing regulations (34 CFR 668.41 and 34 CFR 668.47) require coeducational institutions that participate in the Title IV, HEA federal student aid programs and that have an intercollegiate athletic program to annually prepare a report on athletic participation, staffing, revenue and expenditures by gender, and by men’s and women’s teams. An institution must make the report available to students, potential students, and the public upon request. An institution must also report the data to the Department of Education and the Department makes the information publicly available on its website.

On the Head Coaches’ Salaries Screen and Assistant Coaches’ Salaries Screen, we would like the text to say “coaching positions” instead of “coaches”. This is an important distinction because sometimes coaches change mid-year, and it has created confusion in the past. In addition, we have changed the “Athletic Sanctioning Bodies” section to reflect current terminology. Specifically, we have:

Changed

  • NCAA Division 1-A to NCAA Division I- FBS

  • NCAA Division 1-AA to NCAA Division I- FCS

  • NCAA Division 1-AAA to NCAA Division I without football


Removed

  • NAIA Division III


Added

  • Independent

  • USCAA

  • NWAC

  • CCCAA



2. Indicate how, by whom, and for what purpose the information is to be used. Except for a new collection, indicate the actual use the agency has made of the information received from the current collection.

The information in the EADA report is used by prospective student-athletes to help them choose a postsecondary institution. Prospective and current students and the public also use the information to assess an institution’s commitment to and progress toward gender equity in intercollegiate athletics.

3. Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or forms of information technology, e.g. permitting electronic submission of responses, and the basis for the decision of adopting this means of collection. Also describe any consideration given to using technology to reduce burden.

The information collection is conducted via a web-based application (the EADA Survey). Institutions are required to submit their information electronically using the EADA survey. Data submitted online are migrated to the Office of Postsecondary Education’s (OPE’s) public dissemination website at http://ope.ed.gov/athletics for anyone to view. The EADA Survey has been conducted electronically since collection year 2001.

Institutions must also disclose the report to current and prospective students and the public. Institutions are encouraged to use appropriate information technologies to reduce their burden. For instance, in the preamble to the final rules (60 Fed Reg 61426 (1995)), the Department explicitly noted that institutions may opt to make the information available by electronic means.



4. Describe efforts to identify duplication. Show specifically why any similar information already available cannot be used or modified for use for the purposes described in Item 2 above.

There is some overlap between these requirements and those with which an institution must comply pursuant to its Program Participation Agreement (PPA) in 34 CFR 668.14, but there is no duplication in the data collected. Under those regulations, an institution entering into a PPA with the department must agree that, if the institution is coeducational and has an intercollegiate athletic program, it will comply with the provisions in 34 CFR 668.48.



5. If the collection of information impacts small businesses or other small entities, describe any methods used to minimize burden. A small entity may be (1) a small business which is deemed to be one that is independently owned and operated and that is not dominant in its field of operation; (2) a small organization that is any not-for-profit enterprise that is independently owned and operated and is not dominant in its field; or (3) a small government jurisdiction, which is a government of a city, county, town, township, school district, or special district with a population of less than 50,000.

These requirements have no impact on small businesses or other entities.



6. Describe the consequences to Federal program or policy activities if the collection is not conducted or is conducted less frequently, as well as any technical or legal obstacles to reducing burden.

Per statute, the information must be collected and disclosed annually.



7. Explain any special circumstances that would cause an information collection to be conducted in a manner:

  • requiring respondents to report information to the agency more often than quarterly;



  • requiring respondents to prepare a written response to a collection of information in fewer than 30 days after receipt of it;



  • requiring respondents to submit more than an original and two copies of any document;



  • requiring respondents to retain records, other than health, medical, government contract, grant-in-aid, or tax records for more than three years;



  • in connection with a statistical survey, that is not designed to produce valid and reliable results than can be generalized to the universe of study;



  • requiring the use of a statistical data classification that has not been reviewed and approved by OMB;



  • that includes a pledge of confidentiality that is not supported by authority established in statute or regulation, that is not supported by disclosure and data security policies that are consistent with the pledge, or that unnecessarily impedes sharing of data with other agencies for compatible confidential use; or



  • requiring respondents to submit proprietary trade secrets, or other confidential information unless the agency can demonstrate that it has instituted procedures to protect the information’s confidentiality to the extent permitted by law.



This information collection requires no special circumstances.



  1. As applicable, state that the Department has published the 60 and 30 Day Federal Register notices as required by 5 CFR 1320.8(d), soliciting comments on the information collection prior to submission to OMB. Summarize public comments received in response to that notice and describe actions taken by the agency in response to these comments. Specifically address comments received on cost and hour burden.



Describe efforts to consult with persons outside the agency to obtain their views on the availability of data, frequency of collection, the clarity of instruction and record keeping, disclosure, or reporting format (if any), and on the data elements to be recorded, disclosed, or reported.



Consultation with representatives of those from whom information is to be obtained or those who must compile records should occur at least once every 3 years – even if the collection of information activity is the same as in prior periods. There may be circumstances that may preclude consultation in a specific situation. These circumstances should be explained.

ED will publish the applicable 60 and 30 day notices in the Federal Register inviting public comment on the form and the burden assessment. This is the 60 day notice.

9. Explain any decision to provide any payment or gift to respondents, other than remuneration of contractors or grantees with meaningful justification.

There are no payments or gifts to respondents.



10. Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for the assurance in statute, regulation, or agency policy. If personally identifiable information (PII) is being collected, a Privacy Act statement should be included on the instrument. Please provide a citation for the Systems of Record Notice and the date a Privacy Impact Assessment was completed as indicated on the IC Data Form. A confidentiality statement with a legal citation that authorizes the pledge of confidentiality should be provided.2 If the collection is subject to the Privacy Act, the Privacy Act statement is deemed sufficient with respect to confidentiality. If there is no expectation of confidentiality, simply state that the Department makes no pledge about the confidentially of the data.

The EADA and regulations require an institution to disclose the average salaries of head and assistant coaches of men and women’s teams. There are a very small number of co-ed teams. Requiring institutions to report separate averages for coaches of co-ed teams might effectively require the institution to disclose an individual’s salary. To avoid this, the Department allows institutions to include the average salaries of coaches of co-ed teams as a pro-rated portion of the average salaries of coaches of men’s and women’s teams (60 Fed Reg 61432 (1995)).



11. Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature, such as sexual behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and other matters that are commonly considered private. The justification should include the reasons why the agency considers the questions necessary, the specific uses to be made of the information, the explanation to be given to persons from whom the information is requested, and any steps to be taken to obtain their consent.

These requirements contain no questions of a sensitive nature.



12. Provide estimates of the hour burden of the collection of information. The statement should:

  • Indicate the number of respondents by affected public type (federal government, individuals or households, private sector – businesses or other for-profit, private sector – not-for-profit institutions, farms, state, local or tribal governments), frequency of response, annual hour burden, and an explanation of how the burden was estimated, including identification of burden type: recordkeeping, reporting or third party disclosure. All narrative should be included in item 12. Unless directed to do so, agencies should not conduct special surveys to obtain information on which to base hour burden estimates. Consultation with a sample (fewer than 10) of potential respondents is desirable. If the hour burden on respondents is expected to vary widely because of differences in activity, size, or complexity, show the range of estimated hour burden, and explain the reasons for the variance. Generally, estimates should not include burden hours for customary and usual business practices.



  • If this request for approval covers more than one form, provide separate hour burden estimates for each form and aggregate the hour burdens in the ROCIS IC Burden Analysis Table. (The table should at minimum include Respondent types, IC activity, Respondent and Responses, Hours/Response, and Total Hours)



  • Provide estimates of annualized cost to respondents of the hour burdens for collections of information, identifying and using appropriate wage rate categories. The cost of contracting out or paying outside parties for information collection activities should not be included here. Instead, this cost should be included in Item 14.



These requirements apply to institutions that participate in a title IV, HEA program and have an intercollegiate athletic program.  2,075 institutions reported data in the 2014 collection cycle, and 2,073 institutions reported data in the 2015 collection cycle.  We do not anticipate that this number will grow substantially in the coming years. 

The annual reporting burden is 5.5 hours per respondent.  Therefore, the total overall annual burden is 11,401.5 hours (5.5 hours per respondent X 2,073 respondents). 

The annual cost per respondent is $110.00 (5.5 hours X $20.00 per hour).  The total annual cost for all respondents is $228,030 (2,073 respondents X $110.00).

13. Provide an estimate of the total annual cost burden to respondents or record keepers resulting from the collection of information. (Do not include the cost of any hour burden shown in Items 12 and 14.)

  • The cost estimate should be split into two components: (a) a total capital and start-up cost component (annualized over its expected useful life); and (b) a total operation and maintenance and purchase of services component. The estimates should take into account costs associated with generating, maintaining, and disclosing or providing the information. Include descriptions of methods used to estimate major cost factors including system and technology acquisition, expected useful life of capital equipment, the discount rate(s), and the time period over which costs will be incurred. Capital and start-up costs include, among other items, preparations for collecting information such as purchasing computers and software; monitoring, sampling, drilling and testing equipment; and acquiring and maintaining record storage facilities.



  • If cost estimates are expected to vary widely, agencies should present ranges of cost burdens and explain the reasons for the variance. The cost of contracting out information collection services should be a part of this cost burden estimate. In developing cost burden estimates, agencies may consult with a sample of respondents (fewer than 10), utilize the 60-day pre-OMB submission public comment process and use existing economic or regulatory impact analysis associated with the rulemaking containing the information collection, as appropriate.



  • Generally, estimates should not include purchases of equipment or services, or portions thereof, made: (1) prior to October 1, 1995, (2) to achieve regulatory compliance with requirements not associated with the information collection, (3) for reasons other than to provide information or keep records for the government or (4) as part of customary and usual business or private practices. Also, these estimates should not include the hourly costs (i.e., the monetization of the hours) captured above in Item 12



Total Annualized Capital/Startup Cost :      $0.00

Total Annual Costs (O&M) :      $0.00

____________________

Total Annualized Costs Requested :      $0.00



There are no costs associated with responding to these requirements other than those detailed in response to Question No. 12.



14. Provide estimates of annualized cost to the Federal government. Also, provide a description of the method used to estimate cost, which should include quantification of hours, operational expenses (such as equipment, overhead, printing, and support staff), and any other expense that would not have been incurred without this collection of information. Agencies also may aggregate cost estimates from Items 12, 13, and 14 in a single table.

Estimated annual cost to the Federal government:



Salaried Staff               12 hours              $1,000.00   

Contract Costs 1400                $390,000.00

Estimated total costs to the Federal Government:  $391,000.00



15. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments. Generally, adjustments in burden result from re-estimating burden and/or from economic phenomenon outside of an agency’s control (e.g., correcting a burden estimate or an organic increase in the size of the reporting universe). Program changes result from a deliberate action that materially changes a collection of information and generally are result of new statute or an agency action (e.g., changing a form, revising regulations, redefining the respondent universe, etc.). Burden changes should be disaggregated by type of change (i.e., adjustment, program change due to new statute, and/or program change due to agency discretion), type of collection (new, revision, extension, reinstatement with change, reinstatement without change) and include totals for changes in burden hours, responses and costs (if applicable).

The total annual cost burden to respondents remains the same. As explained above, the number of institutions in the most recent year with data available was 2,073, a decrease of only 1 respondent over the previously submitted 2,074 respondents. 

The annual cost to the Federal Government has increased due to increased contract costs in the form of increased contractor salaries.



16. For collections of information whose results will be published, outline plans for tabulation and publication. Address any complex analytical techniques that will be used. Provide the time schedule for the entire project, including beginning and ending dates of the collection of information, completion of report, publication dates, and other actions.

This information collection is available via the Department’s web site if the public wishes to view the information.



17. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of the information collection, explain the reasons that display would be inappropriate.

We are not seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval.



18. Explain each exception to the certification statement identified in the Certification of Paperwork Reduction Act.

There are no exceptions to the certification statement.



1 Please limit pasted text to no longer than 3 paragraphs.

2 Requests for this information are in accordance with the following ED and OMB policies: Privacy Act of 1974, OMB Circular A-108 – Privacy Act Implementation – Guidelines and Responsibilities, OMB Circular A-130 Appendix I – Federal Agency Responsibilities for Maintaining Records About Individuals, OMB M-03-22 – OMB Guidance for Implementing the Privacy Provisions of the E-Government Act of 2002, OMB M-06-15 – Safeguarding Personally Identifiable Information, OM:6-104 – Privacy Act of 1974 (Collection, Use and Protection of Personally Identifiable Information)





7



File Typeapplication/msword
AuthorAuthorised User
Last Modified ByKate Mullan
File Modified2016-01-12
File Created2016-01-12

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy