O*NET Non-response Analysis

7 ONET ICR AppxE_Nonresponse_Analysis_01.21.15.pdf

O*Net Data Collection Program

O*NET Non-response Analysis

OMB: 1205-0421

Document [pdf]
Download: pdf | pdf
Appendix E: Nonresponse Analysis

Appendix E: Nonresponse Analysis
Nonresponse in the O*NET Data Collection Program can occur from any of three sources.
Establishments can cause nonresponse when a business fails to participate at the verification, screening,
recruiting, or sampling stage of selection. This type of nonresponse is referred to as establishment
nonresponse. A second type of nonresponse, referred to as employee nonresponse, occurs at the employee
level when a selected employee fails to complete and return a questionnaire. Finally, employees who
return their questionnaires may inadvertently or intentionally skip one or more items on the questionnaire.
This type of missing data is known as item nonresponse. These three types of nonresponse are discussed
here.
The data analyzed here come from the Establishment Method data included in Analysis Cycles
13–15.1 Data from the Occupation Expert (OE) Method does not lend itself to this type of analysis: OE
Method respondents are not sampled through establishments and are often volunteer respondents not
related to a target population from which bias can be measured.

E.1

How Nonresponse Is Related to Bias

Nonresponse bias is the expected difference between an estimate from the responding cases and
an estimate from all cases originally selected from the target population. The extent to which nonresponse
bias occurs ultimately depends on (1) the extent of missing data and (2) the difference in an estimate
between respondents and nonrespondents. For example, consider the equation

X  pR X R  pN X N

,

(1)

which says that an overall population estimate, X , depends on the proportion of respondents and
nonrespondents (denoted p R and p N , respectively, with p R + p N = 1) and the mean response from
both respondents and nonrespondents (denoted X R and X N ). Bias due to nonresponse is given by the
equation

Bias ( X R ) = X R  X ,

(2)

demonstrating that bias varies as a function of the overall population estimate and the mean response from
respondents. In the estimate, the bias due to nonresponse increases as the difference between X R and X
increases. Now, substituting Equation (1) into Equation (2) gives
1

A total of 15 analysis cycles have been completed through June 2014. An analysis of nonresponse in Analysis
Cycles 1–3 was included in the September 2, 2005, Office of Management and Budget submission (Appendix E);
an analysis of nonresponse in Cycles 4–8 was included in the December 10, 2008, Office of Management and
Budget submission (Appendix H); and an analysis of nonresponse in Cycles 9–12 was included in the April 10,
2012, Office of Management and Budget submission (Appendix E).

E-1

Appendix E: Nonresponse Analysis

OMB Supporting Statement

Bias ( X R ) = X R (1– p R ) – pN X N ,

(3)

and because 1 − p R = p N , Equation (3) can be expressed as

Bias ( X R ) = p N ( X R  X N ).

(4)

Equation (4) reveals that the components of nonresponse bias depend on the proportion of
nonrespondents in the eligible sample and the difference between mean responses for respondents and
those for nonrespondents. If either or both components are small, then the bias should also be small. If
important biases occur, usually a substantial proportion of nonrespondents ( p N ) exists and there is a
large difference between the mean responses (Kish, 1965). When one uses sample data to approximate
bias, the components p N , X R , and X N can be estimated with sample data across attributes that can be
measured for both respondents and nonrespondents. Unless a special nonresponse follow-up study is
conducted, it is rarely possible to measure any of the primary study outcome variables on the
nonrespondents; if any such data existed, they would be on respondents. Thus, to obtain surrogates for the
primary outcome variables, it is necessary to turn to other variables, those available for both respondents
and nonrespondents. If respondent data indicate that the surrogate variables are related to the primary
outcome variables, then any nonresponse bias, or lack thereof, observed in the surrogate variables can be
inferred to the primary outcome variables. Such approximations are not deterministic but can evince
potential nonresponse bias.
The likelihood of missing data may be related to an observed variable, such as the number of
employees in a business establishment. For example, employees from larger establishments may be less
likely to respond than employees from smaller establishments. Analyzing work activities, work context,
or knowledge across jobs within an occupation could therefore be subject to bias if the work performed
differs systematically by establishment size—that is, if employees in larger establishments tend to
respond differently from employees in smaller establishments. In this hypothetical example, employees in
larger establishments may be less likely to respond, and if they do respond, they may respond differently
from employees in smaller establishments. This situation would cause both components of nonresponse
bias ( p N and X R  X N ) to be magnified.
In general, restricting an analysis to only those cases that are observed may introduce bias into the
results unless the missing-data mechanism is accounted for in the analysis (Graham, Hofer, & Piccinin,
1994; Little & Rubin, 1987; Schafer, 2000). Weighting is one common method of adjusting for
nonresponse patterns on the basis of observed values (Little & Rubin, 1987). The O*NET Data Collection
Program incorporates weighting as one method for protecting against the influence of nonresponse bias.2

E.2

Establishment Nonresponse

Exhibits E-1 and E-2 (at the end of this appendix) display, respectively, the establishment
eligibility and response rates for Analysis Cycles 13–15 by stage of data collection, and a comparison of
the distribution of respondents and the distribution of nonrespondents across various establishment
2

For a discussion of weighting, see Section B.1.1 in Part B of the Supporting Statement.

E-2

OMB Supporting Statement

Appendix E: Nonresponse Analysis

attributes. The analysis population of establishments includes any establishment that had at least one of its
assigned occupations published in Analysis Cycles 13–15, whether or not any of the occupations were
eventually selected from that establishment. The rates and distributions are presented separately by
various variables to allow examination of the possibility of nonresponse bias. These variables were
selected because they were available for both respondents and nonrespondents and were likely to be
related3 to the primary outcome variables of the O*NET Program.
The following describes the major row headings within Exhibits E-1 and E-2:


Census Division is assigned according to the address of the establishment.



Total Employees in Establishment is the establishment total employment estimate on the
sample frame. The category unknown for total employees in an establishment is an actual
frame classification.



SIC Division is the Standard Industry Classification of the establishment.



NAICS Sector is the North American Industry Classification System of the establishment.



Number of Occupations on Establishment Sampling List is the number of occupations linked
to an establishment’s sampling list. This number may be viewed as a measure of the point of
contact’s (POC’s) perceived level of burden.



Time Zone and Metropolitan Status were assigned according to the establishment’s zip code.

E.2.1 Establishment Final Unweighted Response Rates
Exhibit E-1 displays the establishment eligibility and response rates for Analysis Cycles 13–15 by
stage of data collection.
The following describes the Exhibit E-1 column headings:

3



Total Estab is the total number of selected establishments at the verification stage.



Verification, Screening, Recruiting, and Sampling refer to the four stages of data collection
used in recruiting establishments. Only those establishments that responded at the previous
stage were used in the computation of rates. For example, screening rates reflect only
establishments that responded at the verification stage. Final rates are combined rates across
all stages of data collection. All establishments are considered to be eligible at the verification
stage. At subsequent stages, nonrespondents from the previous stage are removed from the
denominator of the eligibility rate; therefore, the final eligibility rate, defined as the total
number of eligible establishments divided by the total establishments in the sample, is not
equivalent to the product of the eligibility rates at each stage. Similarly, establishments that
were identified as ineligible in the previous stage are not included in the denominator of the
response rate for a particular stage. Thus, the final response rate, defined as the total number
of responding establishments divided by the total number of eligible establishments in the
sample, is not the product of the response rates at each stage.



Elig is the percentage of establishments that are considered eligible. Establishments are
considered survey eligible if they are classified as (1) at the same street address or building as
in the sampling frame, (2) in business (permanently or temporarily), (3) able to be located,

Based on logistic regression modeling results of establishment-level response propensity.

E-3

Appendix E: Nonresponse Analysis

OMB Supporting Statement

and (4) not a duplicate. Establishments that have no employees in the list of occupations
asked about during data collection are not considered survey ineligible but instead are
considered to be sampling-stage respondents.


Resp is the percentage of eligible establishments that are considered respondents; that is, they
did not refuse to participate in the study.

The data in Exhibit E-1 reveal that the final unweighted response rate for establishments was
77.8%. The final eligibility rate was 81.2%.4 The data also indicate that response rates varied for the four
data collection stages, with the lowest response rate occurring at the recruiting stage (87.0%) and the
lowest eligibility rate occurring at the verification stage (85.5%). These results are intuitive for the
following reasons:


Typically, it was not until the recruiting stage of data collection that the POC realized the
burden involved in participation. Consequently, it was expected that most nonresponse would
occur at this stage.



The lowest eligibility rate was expected at the verification stage, when each establishment is
first contacted and when establishments that closed or moved their business are first
identified.

Using frame information, one can compare the respondents and nonrespondents across various
attributes to approximate nonresponse bias. An estimate of the first source of nonresponse bias can be
found in Exhibit E-1 under the column headed Final Resp. As mentioned above, low response rates
indicate possible nonresponse bias. RTI assessed the response rate for each level of a specific attribute
against the overall value to determine whether the difference was significant. This assessment was
conducted separately for each stage of data collection. Differences statistically significant at the 0.05 level
are indicated with an asterisk (*).5
Census Division. Establishments in the West North Central region (81.8%) had the highest
significant final response rate, whereas the Middle Atlantic region (75.0%) had the lowest significant final
response rate.
Total Employees in Establishment. For establishments with 1 to 5,000+ employees, a decreasing
trend appears in the final response rates as the size of the establishment increases. This pattern suggests
that the perceived burden on the POCs in smaller establishments may have been lower than the perceived
burden on the POCs in larger establishments. In addition, in larger organizations participation may not be
at the discretion of the POC but instead may require corporate approval. This observation is consistent
with other literature (e.g., Willimack, Nichols, & Sudman, 2002).
SIC Division. Comparing the different SIC divisions with the overall final response rate, one sees
that Public Administration (91.8%) had the highest significant final response rate, whereas the Finance,
Insurance, and Real Estate (65.8%) industry had the lowest significant final response rate. Response rate
patterns by industry were highly dependent on the occupations included in a particular collection of
4

5

Unweighted rates were used because appropriate weights were not available for ineligible or nonresponding
establishments.
The tests were conditioned on the overall rates because the objective was to identify any subgroups that differed
from the observed overall rate.

E-4

OMB Supporting Statement

Appendix E: Nonresponse Analysis

occupations; therefore, these findings would not necessarily apply to a different set of occupations in
another analysis cycle.
NAICS Sector. Comparing the different NAICS sectors to the overall final response rate, one sees
that Public Administration (91.7%) had the highest significant final response rate, and Finance and
Insurance (65.8%) had the lowest significant final response rate. Response rate patterns by industry were
highly dependent on the occupations included in a particular collection of occupations. These findings
would not, therefore, necessarily apply to a different set of occupations in another analysis cycle.
Number of Occupations on Establishment Sampling List. The final response rate for
establishments with 1–5 occupations on the sampling list was significantly higher than the overall final
response rate (80.6%, as opposed to 77.8%), and establishments with 10 occupations on the sampling list
had the lowest significant final response rate (66.5%). A decreasing trend in response rates appears to be
generally correlated with an increase in the number of occupations on the establishment sampling list.
Time Zone. Establishments in the Alaska Standard Time zone had the highest significant final
response rate (87.9%) compared to the overall rate, whereas establishments in the Pacific Standard Time
zone had the lowest significant final response rate (75.6%).
Metropolitan Status. Rural establishments had a final response rate significantly higher than the
overall response rate (83.6%, as opposed to 77.8%), whereas urban establishments had a significantly
lower final response rate (76.3%).

E.2.2 Comparison of Establishment Respondents and Nonrespondents
Exhibit E-2 shows a comparison of the distribution of respondents and the distribution of
nonrespondents across various establishment attributes. The column showing Percent Difference (Resp
vs. Nonresp) gives an estimate of the second component of the nonresponse bias formula (Equation [4]).
An estimate of the nonresponse bias across an attribute (see Equation [2]) is shown under the final
column, Percent Difference (Resp vs. Overall). As discussed above, a potential source of nonresponse
bias occurs when this difference becomes large. Differences in the final column marked with an asterisk
are statistically different from zero at the 0.05 level. Large positive or negative values indicate possible
nonresponse bias. Although numerous statistically significant differences exist, large sample sizes tend to
increase the likelihood that very small differences will be statistically significant. In this situation, it is
important to determine if the differences are of sufficient magnitudes to be meaningful. For establishment
nonresponse, the differences between respondents and the overall sample do not appear to be meaningful:
87.3% of the attributes had an absolute difference of less than 1 percentage point, 9.5% had an absolute
difference of 1–2 percentage points, and 3.2% had an absolute difference of 2–3 percentage points.6
Another measure of potential nonresponse bias is the effect size, as defined by Cohen (1988). In
this case, the effect size is related to the chi-square test for comparing the equivalence of percentage
distributions from respondents with those of the overall sample. The effect size, w, is calculated using the
following formula:
6

Absolute difference is the absolute value of the final column of Exhibit E-2.

E-5

Appendix E: Nonresponse Analysis

w

OMB Supporting Statement

m

 poi  p1i 2

i 1

poi



,

(5)

where m represents the number of categories (e.g., Census division), 𝑝0𝑖 is the overall distribution, and
𝑝1𝑖 represents the distribution among the respondents.
Utilizing the guidelines suggested by Cohen, an effect size is classified as “small” when it is
about 0.10, as “medium” when it is about 0.30, and as “large” when it is about 0.50. For the variables in
Exhibit E-2, all of the effect sizes were small, with the largest effect size being equal to 0.08 for NAICS
Sector and SIC Division. These results suggest that the distribution of the variables for respondents and
that for nonrespondents are quite similar (i.e., X R  X N is small).
The combination of relatively small absolute differences and small effect sizes indicates a low
likelihood of bias due to establishment nonresponse.

E.3

Employee Nonresponse

Like establishment nonresponse, employee nonresponse is difficult to thoroughly characterize in
the O*NET Data Collection Program because relatively little information is known about the
nonrespondents (except for some descriptive frame characteristics). However, as with the establishment
level, using information known about both responding and nonresponding employees enables indirect
determination of whether the nonrespondents are different from the respondents across variables that may
be highly correlated with the survey data being collected. In this way, potential sources of nonresponse
bias can be approximated at the employee level.
Exhibits E-3 and E-4, respectively, display the unweighted response rates for employees, and a
comparison of the distribution of respondents and nonrespondents across various employee attributes
from Establishment Method data collection for occupations published in Analysis Cycles 13–15.7
In addition to the categories displayed in Exhibits E-1 and E-2, Exhibits E-3 and E-4 also display
response rates by the following employee-level characteristics (rows):

7



Total Selected Employees in Establishment is the number of employees who were selected
from the establishment. Note that this value ranges only from 1 to 20. This range reflects the
rule that no more than 20 employees may be selected from any single establishment per
12-month period.



Questionnaire Type is the type of questionnaire that the employee was selected to complete.
There are three questionnaire types: Work Activities, Work Context, and Knowledge.



Occupation Class is derived from the first two digits of the O*NET occupation code.

Unweighted rates were used because appropriate weights were not available for nonresponding employees.

E-6

OMB Supporting Statement

Appendix E: Nonresponse Analysis

The response rates are presented separately by the various row variables to reveal any possibility
of nonresponse bias. These variables were selected because they were available for both respondents and
nonrespondents and were likely to be related8 to the primary outcome variables of the O*NET Program.

E.3.1 Employee Final Unweighted Response Rates
An estimate of the second source of nonresponse bias can be found in Exhibit E-3 under the
column headed Response Rate. As discussed in Section E-1, low response rates may indicate nonresponse
bias. RTI assessed the response rate for each level of a specific covariate against the overall value to
determine whether the difference was significant. Differences statistically significant at the 0.05 level are
indicated with an asterisk (*).9
Census Division. Employees in the West North Central region had a response rate significantly
higher than the overall response rate (66.6% vs 63.8%), whereas employees in the Pacific region had a
response rate significantly lower than the overall response rate (61.1% vs 63.8%).
Total Employees in Establishment. The response rate for employees from establishments with 1–
4 employees had the highest significant response rate (72.6%) compared with the overall response rate
(63.8%). The lowest significant response rate was for employees from establishments with 1,000–4,999
employees (57.7%).
SIC Division. Employees in the Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting industry had the
highest significant response rate (72.7%). Employees from the Services industry had the lowest
significant response rate (61.4%).
NAICS Sector. Employees in the Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing, and Hunting sector had the
highest significant response rate (73.0%).10 Employees in the Accommodation and Food Services sector
had the lowest significant response rate (52.7%).
Total Selected Employees in Establishment. The highest significant response rate was for
employees from establishments with only 1 selected employee (73.4%). The lowest significant response
rate was for employees from establishments with 17 employees selected (48.5%).
Questionnaire Type. The Work Context questionnaire had a significantly higher response rate
(66.1%) than the overall response rate of 63.8%. The Work Activities questionnaire had the lowest
significant response rate (62.0%).
Number of Standard Occupational Classifications on Establishment Sampling List.
Establishments that had 1–5 occupations on the sampling list had the highest significant response rate
(66.2%). Establishments that had 9 occupations on the sampling list had the lowest significant response
rate (58.0%).
8

Based on logistic regression modeling results of both establishment-level and employee-level response propensity.
The tests were conditioned on the overall rates because the objective was to identify any subgroups that differed
from the observed overall rate.
10
The response rate for NAICS Sector Management of Companies and Enterprises was 100%, but because only one
employee was sampled, this was not considered a reliable estimate.
9

E-7

Appendix E: Nonresponse Analysis

OMB Supporting Statement

Occupational Class. Business and Financial Operations Occupations had a significantly higher
response rate (78.2%) than the overall response rate (63.8%). Food Preparation and Serving Related
Occupations had the lowest significant response rate (53.4%).
Time Zone. The response rate in Pacific Standard Time was significantly lower than the overall
response rate (60.9% vs 63.8%).
Metropolitan Status. The response rate for employees in a rural area was significantly higher
than the overall response rate (67.3% vs 63.8%), and the response rate for employees in an urban area was
significantly lower (62.8%).

E.3.2 Comparison of Employee Respondents and Nonrespondents
Exhibit E-4 presents a comparison of the distribution of respondents and nonrespondents across
various employee attributes. The column Percent Difference (Resp vs. Nonresp) reveals an estimate of the
second component of the nonresponse bias formula (see Equation [4]). The column Percent Difference
(Resp vs. Overall) shows an estimate of the nonresponse bias across an attribute (see Equation [2]). As
discussed above, a potential source of nonresponse bias occurs when this difference becomes large.
Respondent Versus Overall differences marked with an asterisk are statistically different from zero at the
0.05 level. Large positive or negative values indicate possible nonresponse bias. Although numerous
statistically significant differences exist, large sample sizes tend to increase the likelihood that very small
differences will be statistically significant. In this situation, it is important to determine whether the
differences are of sufficient magnitudes to be meaningful. For employee nonresponse, the differences
between respondents and the overall sample do not appear to be meaningful; for example, 89.8% of the
attributes had an absolute difference of less than 1 percentage point,11 9.3% had an absolute difference of
1–2 percentage points, and 0.9% had an absolute difference of 2–3 percentage points.
Another measure of potential nonresponse bias is the effect size, as defined by Cohen (1988). See
Section E.2 for a full explanation. The combination of small absolute differences and very small effect
sizes indicates a low likelihood of bias due to employee nonresponse.

E.4

Item Nonresponse

Exhibits E-5 through E-11 display unweighted item response rates by item, item type, and
occupation for Establishment Method data included in Analysis Cycles 13–15. These tables include
questionnaire data from employee respondents in the occupations published in Analysis Cycles 13–15 and
completed under the Establishment Method. Only items from those questionnaires that satisfied all
completeness and quality requirements were evaluated. Cases that did not satisfy such requirements were
included as employee nonrespondents.
Item nonresponse is analogous to partial-information patterns in which some variables are
observed and some are missing. Even though partial information is present, item nonresponse can still
create biased parameter estimation if the missing values are systematically related to the outcome (e.g.,
wealthy respondents tend to leave an income question unanswered).
11

Absolute value of the final column in Exhibit E-4.

E-8

OMB Supporting Statement

Appendix E: Nonresponse Analysis

Work Activities, Work Context, and Knowledge. The data in Exhibits E-5 through E-7 suggest
that, for the Work Activities, Work Context, and Knowledge Questionnaires, little item nonresponse
exists with respect to any single item on any questionnaire. The lowest response rate for any specific item
in each questionnaire is 93.9% for Work Activities Questionnaire Item 40 (Level), 97.6% for Work
Context Questionnaire Item 49, and 85.3% for Knowledge Questionnaire Item 26 (Level). In addition, as
seen in Exhibit E-10, item nonresponse is slightly more prevalent for Level items than for Importance
items, regardless of questionnaire type.
Occupation-Specific Tasks. It appears from Exhibit E-8 that item nonresponse may be more
serious for certain Frequency and Importance items than for others and for some occupations more than
others (e.g., 53-7062.00, Laborers and Freight, Stock, and Material Movers, Hand accounted for 6 of the
top 10 lowest item completion rates). It should be noted, however, that the eligible sample size is small
for these Frequency and Importance items because a responding employee is not required to respond to
the corresponding Frequency and Importance item if he or she does not consider a task to be relevant.
Most of the Frequency and Importance items with a low response rate were suppressed from publication
because they were also found to be not relevant to the occupation (i.e., too few respondents rated the task
as relevant).
Background Questionnaire. In Exhibit E-9, the item response rates appear to be nearly constant
and high (nearly 94% or greater), with the exception of Item 4 (88.1%), which elicits information from
the respondent about working in a family business.
Item Type. All the response rates by item type were 96.2% or higher (Exhibit E-10).
Occupation. Item response rates are provided in Exhibit E-11 for all occupations completed in
Analysis Cycles 13–15. The overall item response rate was 97.9%, with the lowest response rate, 93.5%,
coming from Construction Laborers (occupation code 47-2061.00). The highest response rate, 99.7%,
came from Quality Control Systems Managers (occupation code 11-3051.51).
The extremely high item response rates indicate a low likelihood of bias due to item nonresponse.

E.5

Conclusion

Unit and item nonresponse can lead to biased inferences if the nonresponse rates are high and
respondents and nonrespondents differ with regard to the characteristics of interest. An examination of
both establishment and employee response rates revealed that nonresponse patterns were somewhat
related to essentially all variables considered in the analyses; however, when examined, the distribution of
respondents and nonrespondents across various frame attributes showed that the overall potential for
nonresponse bias at both the establishment and employee levels was negligible. Because nonresponse
patterns for both establishments and employees are related to the substantive variables measured in the
study, using these variables for nonresponse adjustments to the analysis weights should be effective in
reducing the minimal effects, if any, due to nonresponse bias in the analysis.
At the item level, it was found that different questionnaire types and questions exhibited varying
response rates, and in most cases the response rates were extremely high. This finding coincides with the

E-9

Appendix E: Nonresponse Analysis

OMB Supporting Statement

findings at the establishment and employee levels—that is, that the potential for significant nonresponse
bias due to item nonresponse is negligible.

Exhibit E-1. Establishment Eligibility and Response Rates (Percent)

Category

Total
Estab

Verification
Elig

45,898 85.5
Total
Census Division
2,734 86.0
New England
6,776 86.1
Middle Atlantic
6,624 86.6*
East North Central
3,712 88.1*
West North Central
7,137 84.4*
South Atlantic
2,120 85.5
East South Central
4,387 84.6
West South Central
3,442 83.7*
Mountain
7,738 84.6*
Pacific
Total Employees in Establishment
1,555 80.1*
Unknown
6,619 66.7*
1–4
2,870 84.0*
5–9
11,379 85.7
10–49
7,189 89.8*
50–99
4,513 91.7*
100–249
5,728 92.0*
250–499
2,567 92.9*
500–999
2,144 93.1*
1,000–4,999
106 96.2*
5,000+
SIC Division
Agriculture,
1,327 75.1*
Forestry, Fishing
324 88.0
Mining
3,188 75.6*
Construction
7,638 85.7
Manufacturing
Transportation,
Communication,
4,075 85.0
Electric, Gas, and
Sanitary Services
925 84.6
Wholesale Trade
2,621 89.2*
Retail Trade
Finance, Insurance,
1,981 84.0
and Real Estate
19,240 86.4*
Services
3,351 91.4*
Public
Administration

E-10

Screening

Recruiting

Sampling

Final

Resp

Elig

Resp

Elig

Resp

Elig

Resp

Elig

Resp

98.1

98.0

94.0

99.5

87.0

99.9

96.6

81.2

77.8

98.2
97.8
98.5*
98.8*
98.0
98.1
98.1
98.1
97.6*

98.1
97.9
98.1
98.0
98.0
98.1
98.2
98.2
97.9

93.5
92.9*
93.5
95.7*
94.8*
95.2*
94.1
96.0*
92.7*

99.6
99.3
99.4
99.5
99.4
99.5
99.3
99.6
99.7*

88.1
85.2*
87.0
89.3*
87.0
87.2
87.1
88.4*
86.1

99.8
99.9
99.9
99.9
100.0
99.9
100.0
99.9
100.0

97.1
96.5
96.4
96.7
97.1
95.4*
96.2
96.4
96.9

81.9
81.3
82.5*
84.4*
80.0*
80.9
80.4
79.9
80.3

78.8
75.0*
77.3
81.8*
78.9
78.2
77.5
80.6*
75.8*

98.7*
92.5*
97.9
98.3
98.8*
99.3*
99.4*
99.2*
99.1*
98.0

95.9*
96.2*
96.8*
98.4*
98.4*
98.6*
98.5*
98.8*
97.7
100.0
*

96.9*
94.7
95.1*
94.5
94.4
94.3
92.6*
92.6*
91.3*
88.9

99.2
99.3
99.2
99.6
99.6
99.6
99.4
99.2
99.5
98.9

91.4*
91.1*
85.8
88.3*
88.2*
87.2
84.3*
82.9*
79.2*
68.6*

100.0*
100.0*
100.0*
100.0
100.0
99.9
99.8
99.7
100.0*
100.0*

97.4
99.2*
98.6*
98.0*
96.2
95.3*
94.6*
94.6*
93.0*
89.7

73.9*
59.7*
78.9*
81.7
86.5*
88.8*
89.1*
90.2*
89.7*
95.1*

85.3*
82.0*
79.0
80.7*
79.1*
77.5
72.9*
71.6*
66.2*
53.1*

97.4

96.6*

94.1

99.5

84.7

100.0*

98.2* 71.6*

75.9

98.2
94.7*
98.4

98.5
97.3
98.3

92.9
93.4
92.3*

99.6
99.4
99.7*

88.3
79.3*
86.4

100.0*
99.9
99.9

94.3 84.6
94.3* 69.9*
95.1* 82.3*

76.4
66.1*
74.7*

98.4

97.8

93.7

99.5

87.4

100.0

96.4

80.9

77.5

98.2
98.2

98.3
98.7*

95.2
90.5*

99.8*
99.3

87.2
83.6*

100.0*
99.9

97.1
95.6

80.1
85.9*

79.9
70.2*

98.1

97.6

85.4*

99.1

82.1*

100.0*

96.1

80.5

65.8*

98.1
99.8*

98.0
98.5*

95.3*
98.7*

99.4
99.7

87.6
95.0*

99.9
99.9

97.3* 81.5
80.4*
98.2* 88.9* 91.8*
(continued)

OMB Supporting Statement

Appendix E: Nonresponse Analysis

Exhibit E-1. Establishment Eligibility and Response Rates (Percent) (continued)

Category

Total
Estab

Verification
Elig

Resp

Screening

Recruiting

Sampling

Elig

Resp

Elig

Resp

Elig

Resp

Final
Elig

Resp

NAICS Sector

Agriculture,
Forestry, Fishing,
and Hunting

1,490 69.5*

96.4*

96.0*

95.4*

99.3

89.0

100.0*

98.1* 65.7*

80.2

Mining

320 87.5

98.6

98.5

92.4

99.6

87.2

100.0*

94.1

84.4

74.9

Utilities

1,174 89.0*

99.0*

97.3

94.5

99.2

90.2*

99.9

97.6

85.0*

82.3*

Construction

3,375 76.7*

94.9*

97.6

93.2

99.4

80.2*

99.9

94.8* 71.1*

67.5*

Manufacturing

6,473 87.1*

98.4

98.4

92.4*

99.7*

86.8

99.9

95.4* 83.6*

75.4*

980 84.5

98.7

97.7

94.7

99.9*

86.7

100.0*

97.4

79.3

Retail Trade

2,507 88.0*

97.7

98.6*

90.0*

99.5

83.5*

99.9

95.3* 85.0*

69.8*

Transportation and
Warehousing

1,863 83.0*

97.7

98.0

94.8

99.3

86.1

99.9

95.7

78.5*

76.0

798 85.1

97.3

98.6

94.1

99.8

88.7

100.0*

98.0

79.5

80.1

2,010 84.0

97.9

97.7

85.4*

99.2

81.7*

100.0*

96.5

80.5

65.8*

98.1

98.2

97.9*

99.6

89.1

100.0*

95.6

84.0

83.2*

96.7*

98.2

94.8

99.4

90.4*

100.0*

98.0* 75.9*

100.0*

94.4

88.2

100.0
*

93.3

100.0* 100.0* 85.0

82.4

1,224 82.4*

97.6

97.6

93.5

99.9*

88.5

100.0*

76.9*

78.8

2,111 93.6*

99.7*

97.5

98.0*

99.4

92.1*

99.6*

98.2* 89.4*

88.3*

9,702 88.2*

98.8*

98.1

94.7*

99.3

85.2*

99.9

96.5

83.8*

77.2

561 84.1

96.2*

97.5

94.9

99.2

80.1*

100.0*

93.0* 77.7*

70.3*

962 90.2*

99.0*

98.6

94.3

99.2

86.8

99.8

97.6

85.1*

78.4

2,059 82.5*

97.3

97.9

94.1

99.8*

86.9

99.9

97.5

77.8*

78.1

3,132 91.4*

99.7*

98.4

98.8*

99.7

94.7*

100.0

98.2* 88.7*

91.7*

Wholesale Trade

Information
Finance and
Insurance
Real Estate and
Rental and Leasing
Professional,
Scientific, and
Technical Services
Management of
Companies and
Enterprises
Administrative and
Support and Waste
Management and
Remediation
Services
Educational Services
Health Care and
Social Assistance
Arts, Entertainment,
and Recreation
Accommodation and
Food Services
Other Services,
Except Public
Administration
Public
Administration

349 89.1*
3,560 80.6*

20 90.0

96.9

80.0

82.7*

(continued)

E-11

Appendix E: Nonresponse Analysis

OMB Supporting Statement

Exhibit E-1. Establishment Eligibility and Response Rates (Percent) (continued)

Category

Total
Estab

Verification

Screening

Recruiting

Elig

Elig

Elig

Resp

Number of Occupations on Establishment Sampling List
32,253 83.4* 97.5* 98.1
1–5
1,872 89.7* 99.2* 98.6
6
1,810 88.8* 99.8* 97.9
7
1,168 91.0* 99.4* 98.3
8
1,043 88.3* 99.6* 97.3
9
6,524 91.8* 99.5* 97.7
10
Time Zone
Eastern Standard Time
Central Standard Time
Mountain Standard Time
Pacific Standard Time
Alaska Standard Time
Hawaii Standard Time
Metropolitan Status
Rural
Urban

20,893
12,212
3,340
7,684
297
244

85.5
86.5*
84.1*
84.3*
88.6
80.7

98.1
98.4*
98.0
97.5*
99.6*
98.0

97.9
98.2
98.4
97.8
98.4
98.9

8,447
36,223

86.5*
85.2

98.6* 98.4*
97.9 97.9

Resp

Resp

Sampling
Elig

Resp

Final
Elig

Resp

94.7*
92.9
93.6
94.1
92.8
91.6*

99.5
99.6
99.3
99.1
99.3
99.3

88.8* 100.0
87.9
99.7
86.3
99.9
88.8
99.9
81.1* 100.0*
79.8* 99.9

97.7*
96.5
96.7
95.8
93.6*
92.0*

78.7*
87.1*
85.1*
87.8*
84.0*
88.5*

80.6*
77.9
77.5
79.1
69.5*
66.5*

93.8
94.5
96.1*
92.7*
96.0
93.5

99.4
99.4
99.5
99.7*
99.6
98.8

86.7
99.9
87.4
99.9
89.2* 99.9
85.9* 100.0
93.0* 100.0*
86.8 100.0*

96.9
96.1*
96.3
96.9
98.6*
95.6

80.9
82.6*
80.4
80.0*
85.7*
76.0

77.5
78.3
81.2*
75.6*
87.9*
76.6

90.3*
86.2*

96.9
96.6

83.1*
80.7

83.6*
76.3*

96.6* 99.6
93.4* 99.4

99.9
99.9

Note: Response rates were calculated from those establishments that were classified as eligible at each step. Final
rates are combined rates across all stages of data collection. All establishments are considered to be eligible at the
verification stage. At subsequent stages, nonrespondents from the previous stage are removed from the
denominator of the eligibility rate; therefore, the final eligibility rate, defined as the total number of eligible
establishments divided by the total establishments in the sample, is not equivalent to the product of the eligibility
rates at each stage. Similarly, establishments that were identified as ineligible in the previous stage were not
included in the denominator of the response rate for a particular stage. Consequently, the final response rate,
defined as the total number of responding establishments divided by the total number of eligible establishments in
the sample, is not the product of the response rates at each stage. Statistical tests were conducted only for two or
more establishments. SIC = Standard Industrial Classification. NAICS = North American Industry Classification
System.
*Statistically different from the total category at the 0.05 level.

E-12

OMB Supporting Statement

Appendix E: Nonresponse Analysis

Exhibit E-2. Comparison of Establishment Respondents and Nonrespondents

No.

%

No.

%

No.

%

Percent
Difference
Resp vs.
Nonresp

25,976

100.0

7,433

100.0

33,409

100.0

-

-

Respondents
Category

Total

Nonrespondents

Overall

Percent
Difference
Resp vs.
Overall

Census Division (effect size = 0.03)
New England

1,632

6.3

439

5.9

2,071

6.2

0.4

0.1

Middle Atlantic

3,769

14.5

1,257

16.9

5,026

15.0

-2.4

-0.5

East North Central

3,876

14.9

1,138

15.3

5,014

15.0

-0.4

-0.1

West North Central

2,370

9.1

528

7.1

2,898

8.7

2.0

0.4

South Atlantic

4,152

16.0

1,110

14.9

5,262

15.8

1.1

0.2

East South Central

1,230

4.7

343

4.6

1,573

4.7

0.1

0.0

West South Central

2,518

9.7

730

9.8

3,248

9.7

-0.1

-0.0

Mountain

2,069

8.0

498

6.7

2,567

7.7

1.3

0.3

Pacific

4,360

16.8

1,390

18.7

5,750

17.2

-1.9

-0.4

Total Employees in Establishment (effect size =0.06 )
898

3.5

155

2.1

1,053

3.2

1.4

0.3*

1–4

3,104

11.9

683

9.2

3,787

11.3

2.8

0.6*

5–9

1,674

6.4

444

6.0

2,118

6.3

0.5

0.1

10–49

6,845

26.4

1,640

22.1

8,485

25.4

4.3

1.0*

50–99

4,497

17.3

1,188

16.0

5,685

17.0

1.3

0.3

100–249

2,820

10.9

818

11.0

3,638

10.9

-0.1

-0.0

250–499

3,395

13.1

1,260

17.0

4,655

13.9

-3.9

-0.9*

500–999

1,526

5.9

605

8.1

2,131

6.4

-2.3

-0.5*

1,000–4,999

1,165

4.5

594

8.0

1,759

5.3

-3.5

-0.8*

52

0.2

46

0.6

98

0.3

-0.4

-0.1*

Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing

706

2.7

224

3.0

930

2.8

-0.3

-0.1

Mining

198

0.8

61

0.8

259

0.8

-0.1

-0.0

Construction

1,355

5.2

694

9.3

2,049

6.1

-4.1

-0.9*

Manufacturing

4,384

16.9

1,487

20.0

5,871

17.6

-3.1

-0.7*

Transportation,
Communication, Electric,
Gas, and Sanitary Services

2,337

9.0

679

9.1

3,016

9.0

-0.1

-0.0

535

2.1

135

1.8

670

2.0

0.2

0.1

1,402

5.4

596

8.0

1,998

6.0

-2.6

-0.6*

998

3.8

518

7.0

1,516

4.5

-3.1

-0.7*

11,523

44.4

2,812

37.8

14,335

42.9

6.5

1.5*

2,538

9.8

227

3.1

2,765

8.3

6.7

1.5*

Unknown

5,000+
SIC Division (effect size =0.08 )

Wholesale Trade
Retail Trade
Finance, Insurance, and Real
Estate
Services
Public Administration

(continued)

E-13

Appendix E: Nonresponse Analysis

OMB Supporting Statement

Exhibit E-2. Comparison of Establishment Respondents and Nonrespondents
(continued)

Respondents
Category

No.

%

Nonrespondents
No.

%

Overall
No.

%

Percent
Difference
Resp vs.
Nonresp

Percent
Difference
Resp vs.
Overall

NAICS Sector (effect size = 0.08)
Agriculture, Forestry,
Fishing, and Hunting
Mining

773

3.0

191

2.6

964

2.9

0.4

0.1

191

0.7

64

0.9

255

0.8

-0.1

-0.0

783

3.0

168

2.3

951

2.8

0.8

0.2

Construction

1,493

5.7

719

9.7

2,212

6.6

-3.9

-0.9*

Manufacturing

3,757

14.5

1,229

16.5

4,986

14.9

-2.1

-0.5

567

2.2

148

2.0

715

2.1

0.2

0.0

Retail Trade
Transportation and
Warehousing
Information

1,384

5.3

599

8.1

1,983

5.9

-2.7

-0.6*

1,000

3.8

316

4.3

1,316

3.9

-0.4

-0.1

432

1.7

107

1.4

539

1.6

0.2

0.0

Finance and Insurance
Real Estate and Rental and
Leasing
Professional, Scientific, and
Technical Services
Management of Companies
and Enterprises
Administrative and Support
and Waste Management and
Remediation Services
Educational Services
Health Care and Social
Assistance
Arts, Entertainment, and
Recreation
Accommodation and Food
Services
Other Services, Except
Public Administration
Public Administration

1,020

3.9

531

7.1

1,551

4.6

-3.2

-0.7*

218

0.8

44

0.6

262

0.8

0.2

0.1

2,124

8.2

443

6.0

2,567

7.7

2.2

0.5*

14

0.1

3

0.0

17

0.1

0.0

0.0

667

2.6

179

2.4

846

2.5

0.2

0.0

1,540

5.9

204

2.7

1,744

5.2

3.2

0.7*

5,708

22.0

1,687

22.7

7,395

22.1

-0.7

-0.2

293

1.1

124

1.7

417

1.2

-0.5

-0.1

519

2.0

143

1.9

662

2.0

0.1

0.0

1,144

4.4

321

4.3

1,465

4.4

0.1

0.0

2,349

9.0

213

2.9

2,562

7.7

6.2

1.4*

Number of Occupations on Establishment Sampling List (effect size = 0.07 )
18,735
72.1
4,499
60.5
23,234
1–5

69.5

11.6

2.6*

Utilities

Wholesale Trade

6

1,198

4.6

340

4.6

1,538

4.6

0.0

0.0

7

1,093

4.2

317

4.3

1,410

4.2

-0.1

-0.0

8

755

2.9

199

2.7

954

2.9

0.2

0.1

9

555

2.1

243

3.3

798

2.4

-1.1

-0.3*

3,640

14.0

1,835

24.7

5,475

16.4

-10.7

-2.4*

10

(continued)

E-14

OMB Supporting Statement

Appendix E: Nonresponse Analysis

Exhibit E-2. Comparison of Establishment Respondents and Nonrespondents
(continued)

Respondents
Category

No.

%

Nonrespondents

Overall

No.

%

No.

%

Percent
Difference
Resp vs.
Nonresp

Percent
Difference
Resp vs.
Overall

Time Zone (effect size =0.02 )
Eastern Standard Time

12,030

46.3

3,488

46.9

15,518

46.4

-0.6

-0.1

Central Standard Time

7,271

28.0

2,017

27.1

9,288

27.8

0.9

0.2

Mountain Standard Time

2,036

7.8

470

6.3

2,506

7.5

1.5

0.3

Pacific Standard Time

4,298

16.5

1,389

18.7

5,687

17.0

-2.1

-0.5

Alaska Standard Time

210

0.8

29

0.4

239

0.7

0.4

0.1

Hawaii Standard Time

131

0.5

40

0.5

171

0.5

-0.0

-0.0

Metropolitan Status (effect size =0.04 )
5,486
21.1
Rural

1,079

14.5

6,565

19.7

6.6

1.5*

Urban

6,354

85.5

26,844

80.3

-6.6

-1.5*

20,490

78.9

Note: Because of rounding, the difference columns may not match their constituent parts. Statistical tests were
conducted only for 2 or more establishments. NA = not applicable. SIC = Standard Industrial Classification.
NAICS = North American Industry Classification System.
*Statistically different from zero at the 0.05 level.

E-15

Appendix E: Nonresponse Analysis

OMB Supporting Statement

Exhibit E-3. Unweighted Employee Response Rates
Category

Sampled

Response Rate

37,639

63.8

Census Division
New England
Middle Atlantic
East North Central
West North Central
South Atlantic
East South Central
West South Central
Mountain
Pacific

2,269
4,936
6,037
4,064
6,549
1,839
3,788
3,062
5,095

63.4
63.4
64.3
66.6*
63.9
66.7
62.1
65.3
61.1*

Total Employees in Establishment
Unknown
1–4
5–9
10–49
50–99
100–249
250–499
500–999
1,000–4,999
5,000+

1,142
1,484
1,399
7,307
6,505
5,142
7,616
3,388
3,513
143

57.9*
72.6*
70.8*
65.7*
65.9
64.7
62.5
59.6*
57.7*
54.5

813
242
2,443
7,394
3,922
620
1,717
734
16,816
2,938

72.7*
67.4
61.6
67.0*
64.9
62.7
63.0
67.7
61.4*
67.3*

Total

SIC Division
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing
Mining
Construction
Manufacturing
Transportation, Communication, Electric, Gas, and Sanitary Services
Wholesale Trade
Retail Trade
Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate
Services
Public Administration
NAICS Sector
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing, and Hunting
Mining
Utilities
Construction
Manufacturing
Wholesale Trade

E-16

619
236
1,294
2,515
6,112
713

73.0*
66.1
68.5*
61.0
67.8*
61.9
(continued)

OMB Supporting Statement

Appendix E: Nonresponse Analysis

Exhibit E-3. Unweighted Employee Response Rates (continued)
Category

Sampled

1,607
2,073
341
890
237
2,165
1

Response Rate

Retail Trade
Transportation and Warehousing
Information
Finance and Insurance
Real Estate and Rental and Leasing
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
Management of Companies and Enterprises
Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation
Services
Educational Services
Health Care and Social Assistance
Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
Accommodation and Food Services
Other Services, Except Public Administration
Public Administration

1,872
10,836
592
986
1,280
2,686

65.8
58.6*
65.0
52.7*
72.7*
68.6*

Total Selected Employees in Establishment
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

2,379
2,500
2,535
2,536
2,340
2,232
1,967
10,336
1,197
1,090
1,067
1,104
1,222
1,008
645
1,552
425
252
152
1,100

73.4*
68.7*
66.4
64.6
63.5
63.8
64.4
63.1
63.3
61.2
61.8
64.3
58.8
66.2
62.8
56.3*
48.5*
70.2
53.9
56.0*

Questionnaire Type
Work Activities
Work Context
Knowledge

12,883
12,004
12,752

62.0*
66.1*
63.6
(continued)

584

66.6
61.7
66.9
64.6
67.1
68.0*
100.0
64.2

E-17

Appendix E: Nonresponse Analysis

OMB Supporting Statement

Exhibit E-3. Unweighted Employee Response Rates (continued)
Category

Number of Occupations on Establishment Sampling List
1–5
6
7
8
9
10
Occupation Class
Management Occupations
Business and Financial Operations Occupations
Computer and Mathematical Occupations
Architecture and Engineering Occupations
Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations
Community and Social Services Occupations
Legal Occupations
Education, Training, and Library Occupations
Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports, and Media Occupations
Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Occupations
Healthcare Support Occupations
Protective Service Occupations
Food Preparation and Serving Related Occupations
Building and Grounds Cleaning and Maintenance Occupations
Personal Care and Service Occupations
Sales and Related Occupations
Office and Administrative Support Occupations
Farming, Fishing, and Forestry Occupations
Construction and Extraction Occupations
Installation, Maintenance, and Repair Occupations
Production Occupations
Transportation and Material Moving Occupations
Time Zone
Eastern Standard Time
Central Standard Time
Mountain Standard Time
Pacific Standard Time
Alaska Standard Time
Hawaii Standard Time

E-18

Sampled

Response Rate

18,950
1,864
1,609
1,441
1,635
12,140

66.2*
63.5
64.6
58.9*
58.0*
61.4*

2,106
266
404
1,872
2,043
1,212
190
252
452
7,208
2,370
850

71.0*
78.2*
65.1
68.9*
65.7
68.2*
61.6
73.0*
68.1
58.4*
57.8*
68.1

873
421
1,177
966
3,199
561
2,381
2,705
3,377
2,754

53.4*
61.3
66.9
62.9
69.2*
66.7
62.3
64.3
67.3*
59.3*

17,641
11,424
3,098
5,055
275
146

64.3
63.9
65.0
60.9*
68.0
71.9
(continued)

OMB Supporting Statement

Appendix E: Nonresponse Analysis

Exhibit E-3. Unweighted Employee Response Rates (continued)
Category

Metropolitan Status
Rural
Urban

Sampled

Response Rate

8,791
28,848

67.3*
62.8*

Note: Statistical tests conducted only for 2 or more employees. NA = not applicable, SIC = Standard Industrial
Classification. NAICS = North American Classification System.
*Statistically different from the total category.

E-19

Appendix E: Nonresponse Analysis

OMB Supporting Statement

Exhibit E-4. Comparison of Employee Respondents and Nonrespondents

No.

%

No.

%

No.

%

Percent
Difference
Resp vs.
Nonresp

24,027

100.0

13,612

100.0

37,639

100.0

-

-

Respondents
Category

Total

Nonrespondents

Overall

Percent
Difference
Resp vs.
Overall

Census Division (effect size = 0.03)
New England

1,439

6.0

830

6.1

2,269

6.0

-0.1

-0.0

Middle Atlantic

3,128

13.0

1,808

13.3

4,936

13.1

-0.3

-0.1

East North Central

3,880

16.1

2,157

15.8

6,037

16.0

0.3

0.1

West North Central

2,706

11.3

1,358

10.0

4,064

10.8

1.3

0.5*

South Atlantic

4,184

17.4

2,365

17.4

6,549

17.4

0.0

0.0

East South Central

1,226

5.1

613

4.5

1,839

4.9

0.6

0.2

West South Central

2,352

9.8

1,436

10.5

3,788

10.1

-0.8

-0.3

Mountain

2,000

8.3

1,062

7.8

3,062

8.1

0.5

0.2

Pacific

3,112

13.0

1,983

14.6

5,095

13.5

-1.6

-0.6*

Total Employees in Establishment (effect size = 0.06)
Unknown

661

2.8

481

3.5

1,142

3.0

-0.8

-0.3*

1–4

1,077

4.5

407

3.0

1,484

3.9

1.5

0.5*

5–9

991

4.1

408

3.0

1,399

3.7

1.1

0.4*

10–49

4,800

20.0

2,507

18.4

7,307

19.4

1.6

0.6*

50–99

4,287

17.8

2,218

16.3

6,505

17.3

1.5

0.6*

100–249

3,327

13.8

1,815

13.3

5,142

13.7

0.5

0.2

250–499

4,758

19.8

2,858

21.0

7,616

20.2

-1.2

-0.4

500–999

2,020

8.4

1,368

10.0

3,388

9.0

-1.6

-0.6*

1,000–4,999

2,028

8.4

1,485

10.9

3,513

9.3

-2.5

-0.9*

78

0.3

65

0.5

143

0.4

-0.2

-0.1

Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing

591

2.5

222

1.6

813

2.2

0.8

0.3*

Mining

163

0.7

79

0.6

242

0.6

0.1

0.0

Construction

1,505

6.3

938

6.9

2,443

6.5

-0.6

-0.2

Manufacturing

4,954

20.6

2,440

17.9

7,394

19.6

2.7

1.0*

2,547

10.6

1,375

10.1

3,922

10.4

0.5

0.2

389

1.6

231

1.7

620

1.6

-0.1

-0.0

1,082

4.5

635

4.7

1,717

4.6

-0.2

-0.1

497

2.1

237

1.7

734

2.0

0.3

0.1

10,323

43.0

6,493

47.7

16,816

44.7

-4.7

-1.7*

1,976

8.2

962

7.1

2,938

7.8

1.2

5,000+
SIC Division (effect size = 0.04)

Transportation,
Communication, Electric,
Gas, and Sanitary Services
Wholesale Trade
Retail Trade
Finance, Insurance, and Real
Estate
Services
Public Administration

E-20

0.4*
(continued)

OMB Supporting Statement

Appendix E: Nonresponse Analysis

Exhibit E-4. Comparison of Employee Respondents and Nonrespondents
(continued)

Respondents
Category

No.

%

Nonrespondents
No.

%

Overall
No.

%

Percent
Difference
Resp vs.
Nonresp

Percent
Difference
Resp vs.
Overall

NAICS Sector (effect size = 0.07)
Agriculture, Forestry,
452
Fishing, and Hunting
Mining
156

1.9

167

1.2

619

1.6

0.7

0.2*

0.6

80

0.6

236

0.6

0.1

0.0

Utilities

886

3.7

408

3.0

1,294

3.4

0.7

0.2*

Construction

1,533

6.4

982

7.2

2,515

6.7

-0.8

-0.3

Manufacturing

4,141

17.2

1,971

14.5

6,112

16.2

2.8

1.0*

441

1.8

272

2.0

713

1.9

-0.2

-0.1

1,070

4.5

537

3.9

1,607

4.3

0.5

0.2

1,279

5.3

794

5.8

2,073

5.5

-0.5

-0.2

228

0.9

113

0.8

341

0.9

0.1

0.0

575

2.4

315

2.3

890

2.4

0.1

0.0

159

0.7

78

0.6

237

0.6

0.1

0.0

1,473

6.1

692

5.1

2,165

5.8

1.0

0.4*

1

0.0

0

0.0

1

0.0

0.0

0.0

375

1.6

209

1.5

584

1.6

0.0

0.0

1,231

5.1

641

4.7

1,872

5.0

0.4

0.1

6,349

26.4

4,487

33.0

10,836

28.8

-6.5

-2.4*

385

1.6

207

1.5

592

1.6

0.1

0.0

520

2.2

466

3.4

986

2.6

-1.3

-0.5*

930

3.9

350

2.6

1,280

3.4

1.3

0.5*

1,843

7.7

843

6.2

2,686

7.1

1.5

Wholesale Trade
Retail Trade
Transportation and
Warehousing
Information
Finance and Insurance
Real Estate and Rental and
Leasing
Professional, Scientific, and
Technical Services
Management of Companies
and Enterprises
Administrative and Support
and Waste Management and
Remediation Services
Educational Services
Health Care and Social
Assistance
Arts, Entertainment, and
Recreation
Accommodation and Food
Services
Other Services, Except
Public Administration
Public Administration

0.5*
(continued)

E-21

Appendix E: Nonresponse Analysis

OMB Supporting Statement

Exhibit E-4 Comparison of Employee Respondents and Nonrespondents
(continued)
Respondents
Category

No.

%

Nonrespondents
No.

%

Overall
No.

%

Percent
Difference
Resp vs.
Nonresp

Percent
Difference
Resp vs.
Overall

Total Selected Employees in Establishment (effect size = 0.06)
1

1,746

7.3

633

4.7

2,379

6.3

2.6

0.9*

2

1,717

7.1

783

5.8

2,500

6.6

1.4

0.5*

3

1,683

7.0

852

6.3

2,535

6.7

0.7

0.3

4

1,639

6.8

897

6.6

2,536

6.7

0.2

0.1

5

1,486

6.2

854

6.3

2,340

6.2

-0.1

-0.0

6

1,424

5.9

808

5.9

2,232

5.9

-0.0

-0.0

7

1,267

5.3

700

5.1

1,967

5.2

0.1

0.0

8

6,525

27.2

3,811

28.0

10,336

27.5

-0.8

-0.3

9

758

3.2

439

3.2

1,197

3.2

-0.1

-0.0

10

667

2.8

423

3.1

1,090

2.9

-0.3

-0.1

11

659

2.7

408

3.0

1,067

2.8

-0.3

-0.1

12

710

3.0

394

2.9

1,104

2.9

0.1

0.0

13

719

3.0

503

3.7

1,222

3.2

-0.7

-0.3

14

667

2.8

341

2.5

1,008

2.7

0.3

0.1

15

405

1.7

240

1.8

645

1.7

-0.1

-0.0

16

874

3.6

678

5.0

1,552

4.1

-1.3

-0.5*

17

206

0.9

219

1.6

425

1.1

-0.8

-0.3*

18

177

0.7

75

0.6

252

0.7

0.2

0.1

19

82

0.3

70

0.5

152

0.4

-0.2

-0.1

20

616

2.6

484

3.6

1,100

2.9

-1.0

-0.4*

Questionnaire Type (effect size = 0.03)
Work Activities

7,984

33.2

4,899

36.0

12,883

34.2

-2.8

-1.0*

Work Context

7,937

33.0

4,067

29.9

12,004

31.9

3.2

1.1*

Knowledge

8,106

33.7

4,646

34.1

12,752

33.9

-0.4

-0.1

Number of Occupations on Establishment Sampling List (effect size =0.04)
12,550

52.2

6,400

47.0

18,950

50.3

5.2

1.9*

6

1,184

4.9

680

5.0

1,864

5.0

-0.1

-0.0

7

1,039

4.3

570

4.2

1,609

4.3

0.1

0.0

8

849

3.5

592

4.3

1,441

3.8

-0.8

-0.3*

9

948

3.9

687

5.0

1,635

4.3

-1.1

-0.4*

7,457

31.0

4,683

34.4

12,140

32.3

-3.4

1–5

10

E-22

-1.2*
(continued)

OMB Supporting Statement

Appendix E: Nonresponse Analysis

Exhibit E-4. Comparison of Employee Respondents and Nonrespondents
(continued)

Respondents
Category

No.

%

Nonrespondents
No.

Overall

%

No.

%

Percent
Difference
Resp vs.
Nonresps

Percent
Difference
Resp vs.
Overall

Occupation Class (effect size = 0.08)
Management Occupations
Business and Financial
Operations Occupations
Computer and Mathematical
Occupations
Architecture and
Engineering Occupations
Life, Physical, and Social
Science Occupations
Community and Social
Services Occupations
Legal Occupations
Education, Training, and
Library Occupations
Arts, Design, Entertainment,
Sports, and Media
Occupations
Healthcare Practitioners and
Technical Occupations
Healthcare Support
Occupations
Protective Service
Occupations
Food Preparation and
Serving Related Occupations
Building and Grounds
Cleaning and Maintenance
Occupations
Personal Care and Service
Occupations
Sales and Related
Occupations
Office and Administrative
Support Occupations
Farming, Fishing, and
Forestry Occupations
Construction and Extraction
Occupations
Installation, Maintenance,
and Repair Occupations

1,495

6.2

611

4.5

2,106

5.6

1.7

0.6*

208

0.9

58

0.4

266

0.7

0.4

0.2*

263

1.1

141

1.0

404

1.1

0.1

0.0

1,289

5.4

583

4.3

1,872

5.0

1.1

0.4*

1,343

5.6

700

5.1

2,043

5.4

0.4

0.2

827

3.4

385

2.8

1,212

3.2

0.6

0.2*

117

0.5

73

0.5

190

0.5

-0.0

-0.0

184

0.8

68

0.5

252

0.7

0.3

0.1*

308

1.3

144

1.1

452

1.2

0.2

0.1

4,207

17.5

3,001

22.0

7,208

19.2

-4.5

-1.6*

1,371

5.7

999

7.3

2,370

6.3

-1.6

-0.6*

579

2.4

271

2.0

850

2.3

0.4

0.2

466

1.9

407

3.0

873

2.3

-1.1

-0.4*

258

1.1

163

1.2

421

1.1

-0.1

-0.0

788

3.3

389

2.9

1,177

3.1

0.4

0.2

608

2.5

358

2.6

966

2.6

-0.1

-0.0

2,213

9.2

986

7.2

3,199

8.5

2.0

0.7*

374

1.6

187

1.4

561

1.5

0.2

0.1

1,484

6.2

897

6.6

2,381

6.3

-0.4

-0.1

1,740

7.2

965

7.1

2,705

7.2

0.2

0.1

(continued)

E-23

Appendix E: Nonresponse Analysis

OMB Supporting Statement

Exhibit E-4. Comparison of Employee Respondents and Nonrespondents
(continued)

Category

Production Occupations
Transportation and Material
Moving Occupations
Time Zone (effect size =0.02)

Respondents

Nonrespondents

Overall

Percent
Difference
Resp vs.
Nonresps

Percent
Difference
Resp vs.
Overall

2,272

9.5

1,105

8.1

3,377

9.0

1.3

0.5*

1,633

6.8

1,121

8.2

2,754

7.3

-1.4

-0.5*

Eastern Standard Time

11,348

47.2

6,293

46.2

17,641

46.9

1.0

0.4

Central Standard Time

7,297

30.4

4,127

30.3

11,424

30.4

0.1

0.0

Mountain Standard Time

2,013

8.4

1,085

8.0

3,098

8.2

0.4

0.1

Pacific Standard Time

3,077

12.8

1,978

14.5

5,055

13.4

-1.7

-0.6*

Alaska Standard Time

187

0.8

88

0.6

275

0.7

0.1

0.0

Hawaii Standard Time

105

0.4

41

0.3

146

0.4

0.1

0.0

Metropolitan Status (effect size =0.03)
Rural

5,918

24.6

2,873

21.1

8,791

23.4

3.5

1.3*

Urban

18,109

75.4

10,739

78.9

28,848

76.6

-3.5

-1.3*

Notes: Because of rounding, the difference columns may not match their constituent parts. Statistical tests conducted
only for two or more employees. NA = not applicable, NAICS = North American Classification System, SIC =
Standard Industrial Classification.
*Statistically different from zero at the 0.05 level.

E-24

OMB Supporting Statement

Appendix E: Nonresponse Analysis

Exhibit E-5. Ten Lowest Item Completion Rates, Work Activities Questionnaire
Sampled

Response
Rate

Recruiting, interviewing, selecting, hiring, and promoting
employees in an organization.

3,569

93.9

Providing documentation, detailed instructions, drawings, or
specifications to tell others about how devices, parts, equipment,
or structures are to be fabricated, constructed, assembled,
modified, maintained, or used.

3,524

95.1

Servicing, repairing, adjusting, and testing machines, devices,
moving parts, and equipment that operate primarily on the basis
of mechanical (not electronic) principles.

3,897

95.7

Estimating sizes, distances, and quantities; or determining time,
costs, resources, or materials needed to perform a work activity.

6,039

95.8

Performing for people or dealing directly with the public. This
includes serving customers in restaurants and stores, and
receiving clients or guests.

5,133

95.9

Servicing, repairing, calibrating, regulating, fine-tuning, or
testing machines, devices, and equipment that operate primarily
on the basis of electrical or electronic (not mechanical)
principles.

3,901

96.0

B06-Level

Assessing the value, importance, or quality of things or people.

6,388

96.2

B41-Level

Monitoring and controlling resources and overseeing the
spending of money.

4,963

96.2

Establishing long-range objectives and specifying the strategies
and actions to achieve them.

5,949

96.4

Convincing others to buy merchandise/goods or to otherwise
change their minds or actions.

4,524

96.4

Item and Description

B40-Level
B21-Level

B22-Level

B05-Level
B32-Level

B23-Level

B13-Level
B30-Level

E-25

Appendix E: Nonresponse Analysis

OMB Supporting Statement

Exhibit E-6. Ten Lowest Item Completion Rates, Work Context Questionnaire
Item and Description

Sampled

Response
Rate

D49

How automated is the job?

7,284

97.6

D45

How serious would the result usually be if the worker made a mistake
that was not readily correctable?

7,284

97.9

How important is it to coordinate or lead others in accomplishing work
activities in this job?

7,284

98.3

How often are there conflict situations the employee has to face in this
job?

7,284

98.4

How frequently is the worker required to make decisions that affect other
people, the financial resources, and/or the image and reputation of the
organization?

7,284

98.4

D39

How much does this job require keeping or regaining your balance?

7,284

98.5

D55

How important is it to this job that the pace is determined by the speed of
equipment or machinery? (This does not refer to keeping busy at all
times on this job.)

7,284

98.6

To what extent does this job require the worker to compete or to be
aware of competitive pressures?

7,284

98.6

How responsible is the worker for work outcomes and results of other
workers?

7,284

98.6

How much does this job require using your hands to handle, control, or
feel objects, tools or controls?

7,284

98.6

How often does this job require exposure to minor burns, cuts, bites, or
stings?

7,284

98.7

D09
D12
D47

D53
D11
D40
D33

*11 items are shown because of ties in response rates.

E-26

OMB Supporting Statement

Appendix E: Nonresponse Analysis

Exhibit E-7. Ten Lowest Item Completion Rates, Knowledge Questionnaire
Item

E26-Level

E08-Level

E27-Level
E28-Level

E12-Level

E25-Level

E22-Level

E17-Level

E20-Level

E19-Level

Item Description

Sampled

Response
Rate

Knowledge of the theory and techniques required to compose,
produce, and perform works of music, dance, visual arts,
drama, and sculpture.

872

85.3

Knowledge of techniques and equipment for planting,
growing, and harvesting food products (both plant and animal)
for consumption, including storage/handling techniques.

1,233

88.9

Knowledge of historical events and their causes, indicators,
and effects on civilizations and cultures.

1,657

92.0

Knowledge of different philosophical systems and religions.
This includes their basic principles, values, ethics, ways of
thinking, customs, practices, and their impact on human
culture.

2,591

94.6

Knowledge of materials, methods, and the tools involved in
the construction or repair of houses, buildings, or other
structures such as highways and roads.

2,526

95.0

Knowledge of the structure and content of a foreign (nonEnglish) language including the meaning and spelling of
words, rules of composition and grammar, and pronunciation.

2,902

95.4

Knowledge of principles, methods, and procedures for
diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of physical and mental
dysfunctions, and for career counseling and guidance.

3,295

95.5

Knowledge of plant and animal organisms, their tissues, cells,
functions, interdependencies, and interactions with each other
and the environment.

3,042

95.9

Knowledge of principles and methods for describing the
features of land, sea, and air masses, including their physical
characteristics, locations, interrelationships, and distribution of
plant, animal, and human life.

2,956

95.9

Knowledge of group behavior and dynamics, societal trends
and influences, human migrations, ethnicity, cultures and their
history and origins.

3,400

96.1

E-27

Appendix E: Nonresponse Analysis

OMB Supporting Statement

Exhibit E-8. Ten Lowest Item Completion Rates, Task Questionnaire
Item

Item Description

53-7062.00, Laborers and Freight,
Stock, and Material Movers, Hand:
T32-Importance

Lay tracks for camera dollies or cranes and
carry or push dollies or cranes as instructed.

29-1069.02, Dermatologists: T10Frequency

Provide liposuction treatment to patients.

53-7062.00, Laborers and Freight,
Stock, and Material Movers, Hand:
T30-Importance

Secure or release mooring lines of ships.

53-7062.00, Laborers and Freight,
Stock, and Material Movers, Hand:
T30-Frequency

Secure or release mooring lines of ships.

53-7062.00, Laborers and Freight,
Stock, and Material Movers, Hand:
T32-Frequency

Lay tracks for camera dollies or cranes and
carry or push dollies or cranes as instructed.

49-3023.02, Automotive Specialty
Technicians: T22-Frequency

Sampled

Response
Rate

5

20.0

11

36.4

5

40.0

5

40.0

5

40.0

Inspect propane or natural gas high-pressure
tanks, piping, or pressure regulators.

14

42.9

53-7062.00, Laborers and Freight,
Stock, and Material Movers, Hand:
T12-Frequency

Sew canvas or other materials to make or
repair tents, tarps, scrims, or backings, using
sewing machines.

9

44.4

39-3012.00, Gaming and Sports Book
Writers and Runners: T17-Frequency

Push dice to shooters and retrieve thrown
dice.

10

50.0

49-3023.02, Automotive Specialty
Technicians: T14-Frequency

Convert vehicle fuel systems from gasoline
to butane gas, ethanol, methane, or other
alternative or biofuel systems.

14

50.0

53-6051.01, Aviation Inspectors: T13Importance

Issue pilots' licenses to individuals meeting
standards.

2

50.0

53-6051.01, Aviation Inspectors: T13Frequency

Issue pilots' licenses to individuals meeting
standards.

2

50.0

49-3023.02, Automotive Specialty
Technicians: T24-Frequency

Retrofit vehicle fuel systems with
aftermarket products, such as vapor transfer
devices, evaporation control devices,
swirlers, lean burn devices, or friction
reduction devices, to enhance combustion
and fuel efficiency.

13

53.8

45-2011.00, Agricultural Inspectors:
T21-Importance

Inspect livestock to determine effectiveness
of medication or feeding programs.

11

54.5

45-2011.00, Agricultural Inspectors:
T21-Frequency

Inspect livestock to determine effectiveness
of medication or feeding programs.

11

54.5

53-7062.00, Laborers and Freight,
Stock, and Material Movers, Hand:
T12-Importance

Sew canvas or other materials to make or
repair tents, tarps, scrims, or backings, using
sewing machines.

9

55.6

16

56.3

47-2061.00, Construction Laborers:
Identify, pack, or transport hazardous or
T19-Importance
radioactive materials.
* 16 items are shown due to ties among response rates.

E-28

OMB Supporting Statement

Appendix E: Nonresponse Analysis

Exhibit E-9. Completion Rates, Background Questionnaire
Item and Description

Sampled

Response Rate

2

How long at job?

21,991

99.3

3

Employment sector

21,991

97.0

4

Family business

21,991

88.1

5

Age group

21,991

96.1

6

Gender

21,991

98.3

7

Ethnicity

21,991

97.0

8

Race

21,991

94.1

9

Education level

21,991

99.1

Items Added to Match the Disability Questions in the American Community
10

Deafness or serious difficulty hearing

542

98.7

11

Blind or serious difficulty seeing even when wearing glasses

542

98.9

12A

Serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions

542

98.9

12B

Serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs

542

98.7

12C

Difficulty dressing or bathing

542

98.3

13

Difficulty doing errands alone because of a physical, mental, or emotional
condition

542

98.5

Items Deleted to Match the Disability Questions in the American Community
9A

Blindness, deafness, or other severe vision or hearing impairment

21,449

98.3

9B

A condition that substantially limits one or more basic physical activities
such as walking, climbing stairs, reaching, lifting, or carrying

21,449

98.3

10A

Difficulty learning, remembering, or concentrating

21,449

96.0

10B

Difficulty bathing, or getting around inside the home

21,449

96.0

10C

Difficulty going outside the home alone to shop or visit the doctor’s office

21,449

96.0

10D

Difficulty working at a job or business

21,449

95.9

E-29

Appendix E: Nonresponse Analysis

OMB Supporting Statement

Exhibit E-10. Item Completion Rates by Item Type
Item Type

TOTAL

Questions

Response Rate

2,926,281

97.9

B--Work Activities--Importance

299,300

98.8

B-Work--Activities--Level

242,399

97.0

D--Work Context

415,188

98.9

29,628

98.8

E--Knowledge--Importance

244,431

98.8

E--Knowledge--Level

138,289

96.9

E--Knowledge--Work Styles Background

118,512

99.2

Background

304,622

96.4

Task--Relevance

451,090

98.8

Task--Importance

341,411

97.1

Task--Frequency

341,411

96.2

E--Knowledge--Education and Training

E-30

OMB Supporting Statement

Appendix E: Nonresponse Analysis

Exhibit E-11. Item Completion Rates by Occupation
Occupation Code

Occupation Title

TOTAL

Questions

Response
Rate

2,926,281

97.9

11-1011.00

Chief Executives

13,816

99.2

11-3031.02

Financial Managers, Branch or Department

10,799

98.1

11-3051.51

Quality Control Systems Managers

9,443

99.7

11-3051.54

Biomass Power Plant Managers

18,295

98.8

11-3051.71

Industrial Production Managers

14,448

98.7

11-3071.81

Transportation Managers

14,652

97.9

11-9013.02

Farm and Ranch Managers

10,490

98.3

11-9041.51

Biofuels/Biodiesel Technology and Product Development
Managers

12,497

98.6

11-9041.81

Architectural and Engineering Managers

16,934

98.5

11-9061.51

Funeral Service Managers

7,838

99.0

11-9071.00

Gaming Managers

11,966

98.0

11-9121.00

Natural Sciences Managers

8,721

98.8

11-9199.06

Spa Managers

8,422

97.8

11-9199.52

Compliance Managers

8,333

98.0

11-9199.53

Investment Fund Managers

10,528

98.6

11-9199.55

Online Merchants

11,871

97.2

13-1021.00

Buyers and Purchasing Agents, Farm Products

7,976

98.7

13-1071.51

Human Resources Specialists

18,107

98.6

15-1133.81

Software Developers, Systems Software

14,416

98.7

15-1152.00

Computer Network Support Specialists

17,999

98.0

17-2072.81

Electronics Engineers, Except Computer

12,270

99.2

17-2199.55

Mechatronics Engineers

8,884

98.7

17-2199.60

Wind Energy Engineers

13,323

98.6

17-3012.01

Electronic Drafters

6,883

99.1

17-3012.02

Electrical Drafters

17,839

97.9

17-3023.71

Electronics Engineering Technicians

10,282

98.8

17-3023.81

Electrical Engineering Technicians

11,306

98.2

17-3025.81

Environmental Engineering Technicians

11,400

98.1

17-3026.81

Industrial Engineering Technicians

9,577

98.0

17-3029.52

Electrical Engineering Technologists

10,273

98.4

17-3029.53

Electromechanical Engineering Technologists

6,554

98.5

17-3029.55

Industrial Engineering Technologists

8,375

98.8

17-3029.57

Mechanical Engineering Technologists

9,521

97.6
(continued)

E-31

Appendix E: Nonresponse Analysis

OMB Supporting Statement

Exhibit E-11. Item Completion Rates by Occupation (continued)
Occupation Code

Occupation Title

Questions

Response
Rate

9,458

98.3

17-3031.02

Mapping Technicians

19-1029.01

Bioinformatics Scientists

10,841

98.6

19-1042.00

Medical Scientists, Except Epidemiologists

11,886

97.8

19-2031.81

Chemists

12,314

98.4

19-2041.71

Environmental Scientists and Specialists, Including Health

13,760

98.1

19-3031.02

Clinical Psychologists

9,250

99.1

19-3031.03

Counseling Psychologists

7,588

98.7

19-4011.02

Food Science Technicians

9,965

97.7

19-4011.81

Agricultural Technicians

12,394

98.4

19-4031.81

Chemical Technicians

10,912

97.9

19-4051.82

Nuclear Monitoring Technicians

15,779

97.9

19-4092.71

Forensic Science Technicians

13,176

99.0

19-4099.01

Bioinformatics Technicians

8,494

98.3

19-4099.51

Quality Control Analysts

16,676

98.2

19-4099.53

Remote Sensing Technicians

8,604

99.4

21-1011.71

Substance Abuse and Behavioral Disorder Counselors

18,425

98.1

21-1013.00

Marriage and Family Therapists

7,235

98.6

21-1014.71

Mental Health Counselors

15,653

98.8

21-1015.00

Rehabilitation Counselors

14,442

97.5

21-1023.71

Mental Health and Substance Abuse Social Workers

13,339

98.9

21-1091.00

Health Educators

9,797

98.8

21-1093.71

Social and Human Service Assistants

12,271

98.1

21-1094.00

Community Health Workers

8,831

97.4

23-1012.00

Judicial Law Clerks

13,956

99.0

25-1113.00

Social Work Teachers, Postsecondary

9,467

98.8

25-2023.00

Vocational Education Teachers, Middle School

19,733

98.8

27-1011.00

Art Directors

8,059

98.6

27-2012.03

Program Directors

10,624

99.3

27-3042.00

Technical Writers

10,554

98.6

27-3091.00

Interpreters and Translators

6,909

97.8

29-1011.71

Chiropractors

7,159

98.8

29-1021.71

Dentists, General

10,345

98.5

29-1022.00

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

7,362

98.4

29-1023.00

Orthodontists

7,533

97.6
(continued)

E-32

OMB Supporting Statement

Appendix E: Nonresponse Analysis

Exhibit E-11. Item Completion Rates by Occupation (continued)
Occupation Code

Occupation Title

Questions

Response
Rate

6,181

98.0

29-1024.00

Prosthodontists

29-1051.71

Pharmacists

16,275

98.4

29-1061.00

Anesthesiologists

13,556

98.4

29-1063.00

Internists, General

7,102

99.1

29-1065.00

Pediatricians, General

9,488

98.2

29-1066.71

Psychiatrists

12,587

97.7

29-1069.01

Allergists and Immunologists

7,997

99.0

29-1069.02

Dermatologists

8,285

98.0

29-1069.05

Neurologists

9,802

98.0

29-1069.07

Ophthalmologists

7,313

99.1

29-1069.09

Preventive Medicine Physicians

8,538

97.7

29-1069.11

Radiologists

10,285

98.8

29-1069.12

Sports Medicine Physicians

10,903

97.4

29-1069.13

Urologists

8,275

98.3

29-1123.71

Physical Therapists

20,008

98.6

29-1124.71

Radiation Therapists

14,763

98.7

29-1126.71

Respiratory Therapists

16,448

98.4

29-1127.71

Speech-Language Pathologists

13,222

97.6

29-1131.71

Veterinarians

11,435

98.1

29-1141.71

Registered Nurses

18,192

98.1

29-2011.71

Medical and Clinical Laboratory Technologists

13,504

98.9

29-2012.71

Medical and Clinical Laboratory Technicians

14,026

96.8

29-2021.71

Dental Hygienists

12,822

97.8

29-2031.71

Cardiovascular Technologists and Technicians

13,816

98.5

29-2032.71

Diagnostic Medical Sonographers

15,939

98.3

29-2033.71

Nuclear Medicine Technologists

17,304

98.5

29-2034.71

Radiologic Technologists

14,770

98.3

29-2041.71

Emergency Medical Technicians and Paramedics

15,373

98.9

29-2051.71

Dietetic Technicians

10,134

97.7

29-2052.71

Pharmacy Technicians

14,462

98.2

29-2053.71

Psychiatric Technicians

8,213

96.9

29-2054.71

Respiratory Therapy Technicians

12,322

97.9

29-2055.71

Surgical Technologists

11,569

98.3

29-2056.71

Veterinary Technologists and Technicians

12,595

98.2

29-2061.71

Licensed Practical and Licensed Vocational Nurses

19,985

97.2

29-2071.71

Medical Records and Health Information Technicians

16,790

97.4
(continued)

E-33

Appendix E: Nonresponse Analysis

OMB Supporting Statement

Exhibit E-11. Item Completion Rates by Occupation (continued)
Occupation Code

Occupation Title

Questions

Response
Rate

6,546

97.9

29-2099.04

Hearing Instrument Specialists

29-2099.71

Radiologic Technicians

12,380

98.6

29-9091.71

Athletic Trainers

15,029

98.8

29-9099.02

Midwives

12,823

97.7

31-1011.71

Home Health Aides

14,327

96.9

31-1013.71

Psychiatric Aides

12,164

96.5

31-1014.00

Nursing Assistants

18,524

96.3

31-2011.71

Occupational Therapy Assistants

12,379

98.0

31-2012.00

Occupational Therapist Aides

5,846

97.9

31-2021.71

Physical Therapist Assistants

14,945

98.3

31-2022.71

Physical Therapist Aides

13,188

97.5

31-9091.71

Dental Assistants

12,047

97.0

31-9092.71

Medical Assistants

14,154

97.3

31-9093.71

Medical Equipment Preparers

9,591

96.8

31-9094.00

Medical Transcriptionists

9,036

98.6

31-9095.71

Pharmacy Aides

9,194

97.2

31-9096.71

Veterinary Assistants and Laboratory Animal Caretakers

11,727

98.1

31-9099.01

Anesthesiologist Assistants

7,444

98.1

33-1011.00

First-Line Supervisors of Correctional Officers

10,691

97.5

33-1021.02

Forest Fire Fighting and Prevention Supervisors

15,165

98.2

33-3021.05

Immigration and Customs Inspectors

9,288

98.7

33-3031.00

Fish and Game Wardens

15,254

98.7

33-3051.03

Sheriffs and Deputy Sheriffs

11,893

98.8

33-9099.52

Retail Loss Prevention Specialists

11,878

97.9

35-2012.00

Cooks, Institution and Cafeteria

16,233

95.5

35-3041.00

Food Servers, Nonrestaurant

10,186

97.2

35-9011.00

Dining Room and Cafeteria Attendants and Bartender
Helpers

13,293

95.5

35-9021.00

Dishwashers

8,937

96.1

37-2011.00

Janitors and Cleaners, Except Maids and Housekeeping
Cleaners

13,258

93.5

37-2012.00

Maids and Housekeeping Cleaners

14,066

95.5

39-1011.00

Gaming Supervisors

13,081

98.1

39-2011.00

Animal Trainers

14,057

98.2

39-3012.00

Gaming and Sports Book Writers and Runners

10,716

97.0

39-4011.00

Embalmers

7,963

99.1

39-4021.00

Funeral Attendants

12,827

96.7
(continued)

E-34

OMB Supporting Statement

Appendix E: Nonresponse Analysis

Exhibit E-11. Item Completion Rates by Occupation (continued)
Occupation Code

Occupation Title

Questions

Response
Rate

39-5094.00

Skincare Specialists

11,288

97.9

39-6031.00

Flight Attendants

12,823

98.5

39-9021.71

Personal Care Aides

11,578

97.6

41-1012.00

First-Line Supervisors of Non-Retail Sales Workers

11,394

98.9

41-3031.02

Sales Agents, Financial Services

5,806

98.8

41-3099.51

Energy Brokers

8,154

98.6

41-4011.00

Sales Representatives, Wholesale and Manufacturing,
Technical and Scientific Products

14,511

98.6

41-4011.57

Solar Sales Representatives and Assessors

8,877

98.6

41-4012.00

Sales Representatives, Wholesale and Manufacturing,
Except Technical and Scientific Products

14,811

97.8

41-9031.00

Sales Engineers

9,363

96.6

43-2011.00

Switchboard Operators, Including Answering Service

16,360

96.6

43-3021.01

Statement Clerks

5,241

96.1

43-3021.02

Billing, Cost, and Rate Clerks

14,318

96.5

43-3041.00

Gaming Cage Workers

12,075

96.7

43-4011.00

Brokerage Clerks

5,610

98.0

43-4031.01

Court Clerks

9,821

98.0

43-4031.02

Municipal Clerks

9,588

97.8

43-4031.03

License Clerks

12,019

96.7

43-4051.81

Customer Service Representatives

11,387

98.2

43-4071.00

File Clerks

13,933

97.5

43-4111.71

Interviewers, Except Eligibility and Loan

10,545

98.4

43-4171.71

Receptionists and Information Clerks

17,855

97.6

43-4181.00

Reservation and Transportation Ticket Agents and Travel
Clerks

8,508

97.9

43-5011.00

Cargo and Freight Agents

8,036

97.7

43-5011.51

Freight Forwarders

19,386

97.7

43-5032.81

Dispatchers, Except Police, Fire, and Ambulance

10,476

98.0

43-5061.00

Production, Planning, and Expediting Clerks

13,567

98.4

43-5071.81

Shipping, Receiving, and Traffic Clerks

14,628

98.1

43-6013.71

Medical Secretaries

13,870

97.8

43-6014.00

Secretaries and Administrative Assistants, Except Legal,
Medical, and Executive

22,210

98.4

45-1011.05

First-Line Supervisors of Logging Workers

9,526

97.8

45-1011.07

First-Line Supervisors of Agricultural Crop and
Horticultural Workers

11,183

97.5

45-2011.00

Agricultural Inspectors

11,879

96.5
(continued)

E-35

Appendix E: Nonresponse Analysis

OMB Supporting Statement

Exhibit E-11. Item Completion Rates by Occupation (continued)
Occupation Code

Occupation Title

Questions

Response
Rate

9,945

97.7

16,845

97.6

8,341

98.3

45-4011.00

Forest and Conservation Workers

47-1011.00

First-Line Supervisors of Construction Trades and
Extraction Workers

47-1011.53

Solar Energy Installation Managers

47-2031.81

Construction Carpenters

17,215

97.3

47-2061.00

Construction Laborers

11,890

93.5

47-2073.00

Operating Engineers and Other Construction Equipment
Operators

16,177

96.5

47-2111.71

Electricians

20,684

98.1

47-2121.00

Glaziers

10,224

96.7

47-2141.00

Painters, Construction and Maintenance

14,909

96.8

47-2152.81

Plumbers

9,788

97.9

47-2152.82

Pipe Fitters and Steamfitters

14,773

98.4

47-2211.81

Sheet Metal Workers

12,491

97.4

47-3011.00

Helpers--Brickmasons, Blockmasons, Stonemasons, and
Tile and Marble Setters

7,678

96.1

47-3012.00

Helpers--Carpenters

7,705

95.4

47-4099.51

Solar Photovoltaic Installers

10,011

97.9

47-5013.00

Service Unit Operators, Oil, Gas, and Mining

6,132

96.7

49-1011.71

First-Line Supervisors of Mechanics, Installers, and
Repairers

19,932

97.9

49-2021.51

Radio, Cellular, and Tower Equipment Installers and
Repairers

6,195

99.2

49-2094.81

Electrical and Electronics Repairers, Commercial and
Industrial Equipment

15,561

97.9

49-3011.00

Aircraft Mechanics and Service Technicians

16,587

97.7

49-3022.00

Automotive Glass Installers and Repairers

6,442

97.1

49-3023.02

Automotive Specialty Technicians

14,465

96.5

49-3031.81

Bus and Truck Mechanics and Diesel Engine Specialists

16,112

97.1

49-3052.00

Motorcycle Mechanics

7,109

98.9

49-3093.00

Tire Repairers and Changers

11,673

98.3

49-9021.81

Heating and Air Conditioning Mechanics and Installers

24,432

97.6

49-9041.00

Industrial Machinery Mechanics

15,048

97.5

49-9051.00

Electrical Power-Line Installers and Repairers

10,356

97.9

49-9062.71

Medical Equipment Repairers

12,292

98.6

49-9071.81

Maintenance and Repair Workers, General

38,054

97.4

49-9099.52

Wind Turbine Service Technicians

9,688

98.4

51-2022.00

Electrical and Electronic Equipment Assemblers

8,492

97.0
(continued)

E-36

OMB Supporting Statement

Appendix E: Nonresponse Analysis

Exhibit E-11. Item Completion Rates by Occupation (continued)
Questions

Response
Rate

Occupation Code

Occupation Title

51-2031.00

Engine and Other Machine Assemblers

11,239

98.4

51-2041.00

Structural Metal Fabricators and Fitters

12,034

96.8

51-4011.00

Computer-Controlled Machine Tool Operators, Metal and
Plastic

13,539

97.3

51-4032.00

Drilling and Boring Machine Tool Setters, Operators, and
Tenders, Metal and Plastic

10,403

98.1

51-4041.81

Machinists

18,505

97.7

51-4081.00

Multiple Machine Tool Setters, Operators, and Tenders,
Metal and Plastic

14,625

97.0

51-4111.00

Tool and Die Makers

10,872

98.0

51-4121.06

Welders, Cutters, and Welder Fitters

17,982

97.6

51-5112.00

Printing Press Operators

9,678

97.2

51-7041.00

Sawing Machine Setters, Operators, and Tenders, Wood

7,695

97.1

51-8011.81

Nuclear Power Reactor Operators

15,339

99.4

51-8012.00

Power Distributors and Dispatchers

9,240

98.1

51-8013.00

Power Plant Operators

14,087

98.2

51-8021.00

Stationary Engineers and Boiler Operators

12,967

97.0

51-8099.53

Biomass Plant Technicians

19,201

98.0

51-9023.00

Mixing and Blending Machine Setters, Operators, and
Tenders

16,541

97.2

51-9061.00

Inspectors, Testers, Sorters, Samplers, and Weighers

33,672

96.5

51-9081.71

Dental Laboratory Technicians

9,153

96.9

51-9122.00

Painters, Transportation Equipment

8,576

96.5

51-9199.51

Recycling and Reclamation Workers

7,641

96.6

53-1021.51

Recycling Coordinators

8,033

98.2

53-1031.00

First-Line Supervisors of Transportation and MaterialMoving Machine and Vehicle Operators

14,296

98.7

53-2011.00

Airline Pilots, Copilots, and Flight Engineers

7,913

98.8

53-2021.00

Air Traffic Controllers

22,595

98.4

53-2022.00

Airfield Operations Specialists

14,706

97.8

53-3031.00

Driver/Sales Workers

8,374

97.5

53-3032.81

Heavy and Tractor-Trailer Truck Drivers

35,709

97.0

53-3033.00

Light Truck or Delivery Services Drivers

9,824

98.0

53-4031.00

Railroad Conductors and Yardmasters

10,463

97.8

53-6051.01

Aviation Inspectors

7,217

98.2

53-7032.00

Excavating and Loading Machine and Dragline Operators

9,848

96.1

53-7051.71

Industrial Truck and Tractor Operators

16,272

97.5

53-7061.00

Cleaners of Vehicles and Equipment

11,251

97.9
(continued)

E-37

Appendix E: Nonresponse Analysis

OMB Supporting Statement

Exhibit E-11. Item Completion Rates by Occupation (continued)
Occupation Code

E-38

Occupation Title

53-7062.00

Laborers and Freight, Stock, and Material Movers, Hand

53-7081.00

Refuse and Recyclable Material Collectors

Questions

Response
Rate

11,770

95.4

5,911

97.5


File Typeapplication/pdf
File TitleExecutive Summary
Authormfw
File Modified2015-04-06
File Created2015-01-21

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy