Form
Approved
OMB No. 0935-XXXX
Exp. Date XX/XX/20XX
Hospital: ______________________________ Interviewer: ______________
Unit: _________________________________ Respondent: _____________________
Date: _________________________________
Obtained signed consent form: Y/N Interviewer Initials:
Permission to record: Y/N Interviewer initials: ____
The following interview guide is for all individuals being interviewed at the hospital, including: health care professionals, unit leads, hospital liaisons, hospital leaders (e.g., quality or safety officer), and other relevant individuals (e.g., patient and family advisory council member involved in improving informed consent). The reference point for the question changes for each of the respondent types as appropriate (e.g., your/ your unit/your hospital’s approach to be asked for individual clinicians, unit leads, and hospital leaders, respectively). In general, questions of health care professionals will be either at the individual or unit level, questions of unit leads will be regarding unit-level changes, and questions of the hospital liaison and other leaders (e.g., quality or safety officers) will be regarding hospital-level changes.
What has been your role and responsibilities in the informed consent process?
PROBES:
If not directly involved, were you aware when, how, or whether informed consent was obtained?
Did you conduct informed consent discussions with patients?
Did you provide information? Show decision aids?
Did you oversee an aspect of the informed consent process? What?
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 30 minutes per response, the estimated time required to complete the interview. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to: AHRQ Reports Clearance Officer Attention: PRA, Paperwork Reduction Project (0935-XXXX) AHRQ, 540 Gaither Road, Room # 5036, Rockville, MD 20850.
Did
you work on informed consent as part of your safety or quality
role?
In
general, do you think your hospital/unit staff and leadership
perceived there was a need to improve your informed consent
practices?
How
well do you think improving informed consent practices aligned with
your hospital/unit’s norms or values?
Has
improving informed consent practices been a priority for your
hospital/unit? Why or why not?
What
incentives were there for champions/unit leads to lead changes in
your hospital/unit?
What
incentives, if any, were there for you/staff members to make these
changes?
What
level of engagement from leadership was there regarding improving
informed consent? Please describe.
What
resources were dedicated to improving informed consent (e.g., staff
time, financial, incentives)?
What
was your role in improving informed consent in your hospital/unit?
PROBES:
To complete the training and self-initiate changes
To complete the training and implement changes selected by unit lead/team
Championed changes in hospital/unit
Held others accountable for making changes in hospital/unit
Which
training courses did you complete, or at least start?
PROBES
Completed Leaders course
Completed Health Care Professionals course
Started but didn’t finish Leaders course
Started but didn’t finish Health Care Professionals course
None
What
in the [insert module] training did you find MOST useful?
What in the [insert module] training did you find LEAST useful?
What do you think should be added to the module(s), if anything?
What do you think should be removed or further clarified in the module(s), if anything?
Did you receive/provide staff any additional training regarding improving informed consent? Please describe.
Did
you/your unit/your hospital attempt to use any of the strategies or
resources from the Health Care Professionals course?
PROBES:
Strategies for Clear Communication
Strategy 1: Prepare for the Informed Consent Discussion
Strategy 2: Use Health Literacy Universal Precautions (e.g., plain language, speaking slowly, using graphics)
Strategy 3: Remove Language Barriers (e.g., using qualified interpreters)
Strategy 4: Use Teach-Back
Strategies for Presenting Choices
Strategy 5: Offer Choices
Strategy 6: Engage the Patient and Their Family and Friends
Strategy 7: Elicit Goals and Values
Strategy 8: Encourage Questions
Strategy 9: Show High Quality Decision Aids
Strategy 10: Explain Benefits, Harms, and Risks of All Options
Did
you/your hospital attempt to use any of the strategies or resources
from the Leaders’ course?
PROBES:
Crafting and disseminating a clear and comprehensive informed consent policy?
Building Systems to Improve the Informed Consent Process
Support #1: Compile a library of clear and simple informed consent forms
Support #2: Maintain a library of high-quality decision aids and patient education materials
Support #3: Provide language assistance (e.g., qualified interpreters)
Support #4: Stock assistive communication devices
Support #5: Establish efficient workflows
Support #6: Train staff at all levels
Developing and Implementing an Action Plan
Championing Change (i.e., Kotter’s 8-steps for organizational change)?
Did you/your unit/your hospital use strategies or tools from other sources? If so, please describe.
Which strategies were you able to implement? How?
Which
strategies were you not able to implement? Why?
Which strategies were easiest to sustain? Why?
What
motivated you/your unit/your hospital make these changes?
PROBES:
Apparent need for improvement
Pressure from outside constituencies (e.g., patient and family council, threat of lawsuits)
Patients responded well
Recognized changes were an improvement
Hospital/unit leaders indicated changes were a priority and set expectations that changes were to be made.
Improving informed consent practices was a priority for me
Colleagues were going through changes too
Anything else?
What
helped you/your unit/your hospital make these changes?
PROBES:
Support from hospital leadership (e.g., policies were clarified)
Support from unit leadership (e.g., workflow changes, team responsibilities clarified)
Sufficient time to improve my informed consent practices
Changes were simple enough to make/integrate
Additional training or other reinforcement of material
Incentives
Recognition
Held accountable for changes
Anything else?
What
were some of the barriers or challenges to making these changes?
PROBES:
Electronic health record issues
Staff turnover, shortages or limited availability
Competing priorities
Lack of accountability
Lack of resources
Lack of time for informed consent discussions
Issues related to teamwork and communication among team members
Resistance from certain team members on the unit for improving the process
Lack of leadership support/Not viewed as a priority of leadership
Time required to make changes
Lack of champion/lead
What
has been the effect of the training courses on your/staff’s
skills and behaviors in informed consent? Please describe.
What has been the effect of the [interviewer: insert specific improvements hospital/unit implemented] on your unit/hospital’s informed consent practices, if any? Please describe.
Are
you aware of what your hospital’s informed consent policy
was before this initiative?
If, yes:
How,
if at all, has your unit’s
informed consent policy
changed since this initiative began?
How were these changes communicated to you? (e.g., unit meeting, supervisor, email)
How, if at all, have informed consent processes changed in your hospital/unit?
PROBE:
Have any staff members taken on different responsibilities?
Has the workflow (sequence of activities) changed?
Is there different oversight of the informed consent process?
Has the documentation process changed?
Which aspects, if any, of your informed consent processes do you think improved since this initiative began.
PROBES:
Assessing patients’ decision-making capacity
Allocating ample time and private space for the informed consent discussion
Using health literacy universal precautions
Calling for qualified interpreters when conducting a consent discussion with a patient with limited-English proficiency
Using teach-back techniques to check patient understanding
Engaging patients, family, and friends
Eliciting patients’ goals and values and help them make a choice
Encouraging questions
Using structured patient decision aids (e.g., tool to help a patient understand the benefits, harms, and risks of a procedure and make a decision )
Neutrally presenting benefits, harms, and risk of the proposed treatment/procedure and of alternatives, including the option of “no treatment”
Asking patients to confirm consent when consent is obtained in advance
Clarifying team roles
Documenting informed consent
Do
you think most clinicians obtaining consent in your hospital/unit
treat the informed consent process as merely getting a signature on
a form, or do they tend to really make sure patients understand that
they have choices and what those choices are?
Has this changed since this initiative began?
On a scale from 1 to 10, where 1 is the worst and 10 is the best, how well does your hospital/unit ensure patients are making an informed choice?
Has this changed since this initiative began?
Teach-back is a way to check that you have explained to patients what they need to know in a manner that they understand. Patient understanding is confirmed when they are able to explain it back to you in their own words.
Had you used teach-back before this initiative?
Have you used teach-back since this initiative began?
On a scale from 1 to 10, how confident are you in your ability to use teach-back in an informed consent discussion? (1 = “not at all confident”, 10 = “very confident”)
Has this changed since this initiative began?
What changes, if any, have there been in your/ your unit’s/ your hospital’s attitudes about informed consent since completing the training and implementing changes?
PROBES:
How have attitudes changed about:
The value of engaging patients, families, and friends as active participants in decisions about tests, treatments, and procedures
Whether patients should be given a choice among all treatment options, including the option of no treatment
Whether clinicians have the responsibility to ensure that patients understand all relevant benefits, harms, and risks before making a decision
The acceptability of getting by without qualified interpreters
The importance of following the hospital’s informed consent policy
Whether informed consent is a safety and quality issue or a compliance activity
What
effect do you think the informed consent changes have had on
patients?
PROBES:
Do they appear more engaged in the process (e.g., ask more questions)?
Do they appear happier with their choices?
Are they more likely to read the informed consent form?
What
other effects have resulted from the changes you/your unit/your
hospital implemented to improve informed consent practices?
PROBES:
Increase in staff morale?
Spurred other quality improvement efforts?
What,
if any, unintended consequences occurred as a result of the
implemented changes?
PROBES:
Detracted from other quality improvement efforts?
Interrupted workflow?
Delayed tests, treatments, or procedures?
Created conflict among staff members?
What
advice would you give to other hospitals/units who want to use these
training modules to improve their informed consent processes?
Is
there anything else you think would be helpful for us to know about
your experience with the training and implementing changes?
How long have you worked in this hospital?
How long have you worked in your current hospital work area/unit?
What
is your staff position in this hospital?
PROBES: RN,
PA, NP, LVN/LPN, Aide, Attending MD, hospitalist, resident, fellow.
How long have you worked in your current specialty or profession?
The following observations and data should be collected, to the extent possible, from hospitals at the time of the site visit:
Observe, to the extent possible, any signage related to informed consent policies or practices, EHR functionalities, action plans, anything else relevant to improvements in the informed consent processes. Do not observe patient-clinician interactions.
Collect copies of relevant documents, including: informed consent forms, policies, training materials, communications to staff, implementation materials (e.g., action plan, report to hospital board or patient and family advisory council, data collection tools)
Examine informed consent forms embedded in EHRs, if applicable
Obtain secondary data, for example:
Training completion rates and numbers by hospital and unit (from LMS)
Implementation tracking data (e.g., action plan tracking)
Patient reported feedback form results or completed forms
Surgical cancellation and delay rates related to the informed consent process
Other data relevant to improving informed consent
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
Author | Sarah J. Shoemaker |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 2021-01-26 |