State Petitions for Exemptions from Preemption
SUPPORTING STATEMENT
1.
Circumstances Making the Collection of Information Necessary
Under section 403A(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 343-1(b)), states may petition FDA for exemption from Federal preemption of state food labeling and standard of identity requirements. Section 100.1(d) (21 CFR 100.1(d)) sets forth the information a state is required to submit in such a petition. The information required under §100.1(d) enables FDA to determine whether the state food labeling or standard of identity requirement satisfies the criteria of section 403A(b) of the FD&C Act for granting exemption from Federal preemption.
FDA is requesting extension of OMB approval for the information collection requirements in the following citation:
21 CFR 100.1(d) - Reporting
Sets forth data requirements for state petitions requesting exemption from Federal preemption.
2.
Purpose and Use of the Information Collection
States seeking exemption from Federal preemption of state food labeling and standard of identity requirements may submit a petition to FDA under §100.1(d). The information required under §100.1(d) enables FDA to determine whether the state food labeling or standard of identify requirement satisfies the criteria of section 403A(b) of the FD&C Act for granting exemption from preemption. In the last three years, FDA has received one new petition from a state agency seeking exemption from Federal preemption.
Description of Respondents: The respondents are states regulating food labeling and standards of identity. Respondents are state and local governments.
3.
Use of Improved Information Technology and Burden Reduction
Section 100.1(d) does not prescribe the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological techniques of other forms of information technology as necessary for use by the states. States are free to use whatever form of information technology may best assist them in the development of their petition.
The
agency estimates that about twenty-five percent (25%) of the
petitions seeking exemption from Federal preemption of state food
labeling and standard of identity requirements will be submitted
electronically in the next three years.
4.
Efforts to Identify Duplication and Use of Similar Information
No
Federal duplication of information collection is likely because state
petitions submitted under
§100.1(d) apply only to statutes and regulations administered by
FDA. States would not be required to submit duplicative petitions
with any other Federal agencies.
5. Impact on Small Businesses or Other Small Entities
The provisions of this regulation are specific to state and local governments and are not applicable to small businesses.
6.
Consequences of Collecting the Information Less Frequently
Data collection occurs occasionally. There are no consequences to Federal program or policy activities if the information is not collected or is collected less frequently.
7.
Special Circumstances
Relating to the
Guidelines of 5 CFR 1320.5
There
are no special circumstances associated with this collection of
information.
8. Comments in Response to the Federal Register Notice and Efforts to Consult Outside the Agency
In accordance with 5 CFR 1320.8(d), FDA published a 60-day notice for public comment in the Federal Register of August 7, 2014 (79 FR 46269). No comments were received.
12. Estimates of Annualized Burden Hours and Costs
12
a. Annualized Hour Burden Estimate
Description of Respondents: The respondents are states regulating food labeling and standards of identity. Respondents are state and local governments.
FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as follows:
Estimated Annual Reporting Burden1 |
|||||
21 CFR Section |
No. of Respondents |
Number of Responses per Respondent |
Total Annual Responses |
Avg. Burden per Response (in Hours) |
Total Hours |
100.1(d) |
1 |
1 |
1 |
40 |
40 |
1There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
The reporting burden for §100.1(d) is minimal because petitions for exemption from preemption are seldom submitted by states. In the last 3 years, FDA has received one new petition for exemption from preemption; therefore, the agency estimates that one or fewer petitions will be submitted annually.
Estimated Annualized Cost for the Burden Hours
FDA estimates that the annualized hour burden cost to respondents for completion and submission will be insignificant.
12 b. Annualized Cost Burden Estimate
The annual hour cost burden to respondents is approximately $2,898.40 per year. FDA estimates that the average hourly wage for the employee preparing and submitting a petition for an exemption from preemption would be equivalent to a GS-12/Step-1 level in the locality pay area of Washington-Baltimore in 2014, approximately $36.23/hour. Doubling this wage to account for overhead costs, FDA estimates the average hourly cost to respondents to be $72.46/hour. Thus, the overall estimated cost incurred by the respondents is $2,898.40 (40 burden hours x $72.46/hr = $2,898.40).
13. Estimates of Other Total Annual Costs to Respondents and/or Recordkeepers/Capital Costs
There is no capital, start-up,
operating, or maintenance costs associated with this collection.
14.
Annualized Cost
to Federal Government
In
the event that a petition is submitted under §100.1(d), FDA
estimates that the annualized cost to the Federal government for the
review and evaluation of such a petition would be $3,447.20. The
cost is estimated as being equivalent to 40 hours of review and
evaluation per year by an employee at a GS-13/Step-1 salary rate of
$43.09/hr for the Washington-Baltimore locality pay area for the year
2014 (40 hours x $43.09/hour = $1,723.60). To account for overhead,
this cost is increased by 100 percent, making the estimated cost to
the Federal government $3,447.20.
15.
Explanation for Program Changes or Adjustments
There
are no program changes or adjustments.
16. Plans for Tabulation and Publication and Project Time Schedule
The agency has no plans for publication of information from this information collection.
17. Reason(s) Display of OMB Expiration Date is Inappropriate
Approval
to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of the
information collection is not being sought.
18.
Exceptions to Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions
There are no exceptions to the certification.
| File Type | application/msword |
| File Title | Supporting Statement for |
| Author | Joanna Capezzuto |
| Last Modified By | Bean, Domini |
| File Modified | 2014-10-20 |
| File Created | 2014-10-20 |