Dear [INSERT CONTACT NAME]
In 2012, the LIHEAP Program Integrity Working Group (PIWG) provided a general analysis of various internal controls and requested that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Community Services (OCS) conduct an in-depth cost-benefit analysis of third-party automated verification systems. As a result, OCS is overseeing a project to implement recommendations from the PIWG concerning 3rd party verification. This two-year project includes an Accountability and Third-Party Verification Assessment, which was distributed to nine grantees in December 2012, and this grantee capacity questionnaire. This data will be used to inform and populate the cost-benefit analysis to be completed in 2014. The project will result in recommendations for grantees on how to improve their program integrity and third-party verification processes.
This questionnaire represents a maturity model – a process for determining the existing capabilities of programs. Respondents are asked to indicate the level of maturity, or sophistication, of their program across multiple areas of evaluation. The data collected will be analyzed to identify strengths and weaknesses among programs and determine opportunities for improvement. This questionnaire is designed to identify and organize the systems, processes and activities that are critical to your state’s LIHEAP program. Each section is focused on a different part of the overall program, and as such may be best answered by an individual with expertise in that specific area of the program. Below we have provided a link to the data collection instrument along with a description of the questions asked in each section. Please forward the link to the individual or individuals who are most qualified to respond to these questions, or answer them yourself, if you are the most appropriate person to respond. When you click on the link, you can access any section by choosing it from the list provided.
While completing this questionnaire you may find it helpful to reference your state’s LIHEAP Household Report, Federal Grantee Survey (issued December 2012) and/or expenditure report.
The link to your state’s questionnaire is: INSERT LINK
I. Information Systems (INF) – This section addresses how information is organized for LIHEAP recipient households, the data collected from LIHEAP recipient households, your interactions with electricity and heating fuel vendors, how your intake agencies function, other state/utility funded energy programs and the follow-up activities your state conducts with program participants.
II. Structure (STR) – This section includes questions about the general characteristics of the program including the department in which it is administered, overall budget and program statistics.
III. System (SYS) – This section is designed to collect details of the grantee's data management system.
IV. Process (PRO) – Questions in this section relate to the ways in which grantees interact with applicants, eligibility verification and reporting.
V. Controls (CO) – This section addresses your state’s process for eligibility determination and benefit calculation.
VI. Security (SEC) – Questions about security and fraud prevention procedures and your ability to meet SSA data exchange requirements are included in this section.
VII. Monitoring of Local administering agencies (or local offices) (MON) – The questions in this section are about processes for managing local administering agencies (or local offices) and controls in place to ensure compliance.
VIII. Training (TTA) – In this section, questions are about opportunities for employee training at the grantee and local administering agency (or local office) levels.
For the questions in sections II-VIII, we ask that you indicate the maturity level that is the best fit for your state’s current practices. If it varies by benefit type, answer based on standard ("regular") benefits. For example, for the question “how do vendors allow local administering agencies (or local offices) to verify customer energy obligation,” you should answer based on the largest vendors that account for most LIHEAP cases. Therefore, if the largest vendors provide a web-portal that is accessible to local administering agencies, the correct response would be web-portal, even though many smaller vendors may not provide one.
Due to variation between programs, the maturity levels provided may not perfectly describe the situation in your state. Please make an effort to select the level that is closest to your current system. Special circumstances should be described in the text box beneath each question, as needed. For example, if you believe your state’s program achieves the same level of maturity as one of the options listed, but implements it differently, you should indicate the details of your state’s process in the text box below the question.
In cases where a particular question is not relevant, please respond with Not Applicable and provide details regarding your response in the text box beneath the question.
Sample Question:
If you choose to exit this module of the questionnaire before completing it your responses WILL be saved, and you will be able to continue the questionnaire where you left off when you re-open the link. Once you complete this module of the questionnaire, you will no longer be able to access it.
TTA1. Does your state provide FAQ Online Portal or Interactive Online Training Resources?
Select the highest level that applies. If it varies by benefit type, answer based on standard ("regular") benefits.
Maturity Level:
NO
NO, BUT PLANNED
YES
NOT APPLICABLE/OTHER – PLEASE EXPLAIN BELOW
Explain your response as needed:
TTA2. How frequently are training teleconferences scheduled?
Select the highest level that applies. If it varies by benefit type, answer based on standard ("regular") benefits.
Maturity Level:
PLANNED ANNUALLY WITH ADDDITIONAL CALLS SCHEDULED AS NEEDED
PLANNED QUARTERLY WITH ADDITIONAL CALLS SCHEDULED AS NEEDED
PLANNED MONTHLY WITH ADDITIONAL CALLS SCHEDULED AS NEEDED
NOT APPLICABLE/OTHER – PLEASE EXPLAIN BELOW
Explain your response as needed:
TTA3. How frequently are training memoranda released?
Select the highest level that applies. If it varies by benefit type, answer based on standard ("regular") benefits.
Maturity Level:
PLANNED ANNUALLY WITH ADDDITIONAL MEMORANDA RELEASED AS NEEDED
PLANNED QUARTERLY WITH ADDITIONAL MEMORANDA RELEASED AS NEEDED
PLANNED MONTHLY WITH ADDITIONAL MEMORANDA RELEASED AS NEEDED
NOT APPLICABLE/OTHER – PLEASE EXPLAIN BELOW
Explain your response as needed:
TTA4. How frequently are training meetings or conferences scheduled?
These are in-person meetings/conferences that bring together all local administering agencies (or local offices). Select the highest level that applies. If it varies by benefit type, answer based on standard (“regular”) benefits.
Maturity Level:
PLANNED ANNUALLY WITH ADDDITIONAL MEETINGS SCHEDULED AS NEEDED
PLANNED QUARTERLY WITH ADDITIONAL MEETINGS SCHEDULED AS NEEDED
PLANNED MONTHLY WITH ADDITIONAL MEETINGS SCHEDULED AS NEEDED
NOT APPLICABLE/OTHER – PLEASE EXPLAIN BELOW
Explain your response as needed:
TTA5. When are training and technical assistance corrective action visits scheduled?
Select the highest level that applies. If it varies by benefit type, answer based on standard (“regular”) benefits.
Maturity Level:
AFTER MONITORING FINDINGS ARE IDENTIFIED
AFTER MONITORING FINDINGS ARE IDENTIFIED AND WHEN PROGRAM REPORTS DEMONSTRATE RISK
AFTER MONITORING FINDINGS ARE IDENTIFIED,WHEN PROGRAM REPORTS DEMONSTRATE RISK AND UPON REQUEST
NOT APPLICABLE/OTHER – PLEASE EXPLAIN BELOW
Explain your response as needed:
THANK YOU FOR ANSWERING THESE QUESTIONS. PLEASE PROVIDE YOUR CONTACT INFORMATION, IN CASE WE NEED TO FOLLOW UP WITH YOU.
NAME: ____________________________________________________
PHONE NUMBER:____________________________________________
EMAIL ADDRESS: ____________________________________________
Please click the finish button and your responses to this series of questions will be saved. If you have been chosen to answer the questions in additional modules, please click on the appropriate module below to move on to that series of questions. Once you have clicked the finish button on this module, you will not be able to access these questions again.
PROGRAMMER NOTE: SHOW REMAINDER OF MODULES BELOW [NOTE: DO NOT SHOW THE CURRENT MODULE AND DO NOT SHOW ANY MODULES THAT HAVE ALREADY BEEN COMPLETED BY THIS GRANTEE].
I. Information Systems (INF) – This section addresses how information is organized for LIHEAP recipient households, the data collected from LIHEAP recipient households, your interactions with electricity and heating fuel vendors, how your intake agencies function, other state/utility funded energy programs and the follow-up activities your state conducts with program participants.
II. Structure (STR) – This section includes questions about the general characteristics of the program including the department in which it is administered, overall budget and program statistics.
III. System (SYS) – This section is designed to collect details of the grantee's data management system.
IV. Process (PRO) – Questions in this section relate to the ways in which grantees interact with applicants, eligibility verification and reporting.
V. Controls (CO) – This section addresses your state’s process for eligibility determination and benefit calculation.
VI. Security (SEC) – Questions about security and fraud prevention procedures and your ability to meet SSA data exchange requirements are included in this section.
VII. Monitoring of Local administering agencies (MON) – The questions in this section are about processes for managing local administering agencies (or local offices) and controls in place to ensure compliance.
END TRAINING MODULE
File Type | application/msword |
Author | david-carroll |
Last Modified By | Cassandra Lovejoy |
File Modified | 2013-08-21 |
File Created | 2013-08-21 |