Supporting Statement for
Indian Self-Determination and Education Act Assistance Programs, 25 CFR 900
OMB Control Number 1076-0136
A. Justification
Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary. Identify any legal or administrative requirements that necessitate the collection. Attach a copy of the appropriate section of each statute and regulation mandating or authorizing the collection of information.
This is a request for renewal of a currently approved information collection OMB No. 1076-0136, which is authorized by Public Law (Pub. L.) 93-638, the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (ISDEAA) as amended by Title I of Pub. L. 103-413 of the Indian Self-Determination Contract Reform Act of 1994. This collection, OMB No. 1076-0136, was previously submitted to the OMB as a joint request for approval by the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) and the Indian Health Service. As of May 2013, IHS is pursuing its own OMB control number for this information collection.
Indicate how, by whom, and for what purpose the information is to be used. Except for a new collection, indicate the actual use the agency has made of the information received from the current collection. [Be specific. If this collection is a form or a questionnaire, every question needs to be justified.]
Through the Negotiated Rulemaking process, representatives of the Department and Tribes developed a rule, at 25 CFR 900, to implement section 107 of ISDEAA. The parties that submit information under the regulation are Tribes or Tribal Organizations authorized by American Indian and Alaska Native tribal governments. Subparts of the rule that contain information collection requirements are summarized below.
Tribal governments and tribal organizations provide the information to IHS when submitting documentation required for a Pub. L. 93-638 contract or grant proposal. The information collected is used by the IHS to determine applicant eligibility, evaluate applicant capabilities, protect the service population, and safeguard Federal funds and resources. The collection permits the IHS to administer and evaluate tribal Pub. L. 93-638 contract and grant programs.
Subpart C contains provisions relating to the initial contract proposal contents (i.e., §§ 900.8, 900.10, and 900.11). The proposal contents essentially consist of a checklist of 13 items that must be addressed in a proposal. These items include basic information about the respondent and program to be contracted, such as: name and address; authorizing resolution; date of submission of proposal; description of geographical service area; estimated number of people to be served; brief statement of program functions, services or activities to be performed; description of the proposed program; financial, procurement, and property management standards; description of reports to be provided; staff qualifications, if any; budget information; and waiver information, as requested. The information is collected at the time the tribe or tribal organization makes an initial application to contract a program.
Subpart F contains the minimum standards for the management systems used by Tribes or Tribal Organizations when carrying out self-determination contracts. Sections 900.40-44, 48-49, 53, 55 and 60 discuss the information and record keeping requirements of contractors regarding the financial, procurement and property management standards. This information is collected and reported at the time a Tribe or Tribal organization makes its initial application to contract a program.
Subpart G provides for the negotiation of all reporting and data requirements between the Tribe or Tribal Organization and the Secretary (i.e., § 900.65). The information collected is directly related to the operation of the program and is negotiated on a contract by contract basis. The IHS uses the information to monitor contract operations and determine if satisfactory services are being provided. The information is collected and reported during the operation of the contract based on the terms negotiated in each contract.
Subpart I establishes procedures regarding donation of Federal excess and surplus property to
Tribes or Tribal Organizations and acquisition of property with funds provided under a self-determination contract. This subpart addressed the procedures to be followed when Tribes or Tribal Organizations wish to acquire excess Indian Health Service property, and excess or surplus government property from other agencies (i.e., § 900.97). This subpart also addresses the process for Tribes or Tribal Organizations to request that real property be placed “in trust.” The IHS uses the information to determine what property the Tribes want to acquire and how the property will be used. The information is collected and reported when a tribal or tribal organization submits a request for excess and surplus federal property.
Subpart J addresses the process by which a Tribe or Tribal Organization may contract for construction activities, or portion of it, and sets forth minimum requirements for contract proposals (i.e., §§ 900.110-133). The subpart requires the tribe or tribal organization to submit descriptions of standards when proposing to contract a construction project. These standards include use of licensed and qualified architects and engineers; applicable health and safety standards; adherence to applicable Federal, State, or Tribal building codes and engineering standards; structural integrity; accountability for funds; adequate competition for sub-contracting under tribal or other applicable law; the commencement, performance and completion of the contract; adherence to project plans and specifications (including any applicable Federal construction guidelines and manuals); the use of proper materials and workmanship; necessary inspection and testing; and a process for changes, modifications, stop work and termination of the work when warranted. In addition to the above, additional information is required when a tribe or tribal organization is proposing to contract design and construction activity.
Subpart L provides the appeal procedures available to Tribes and Tribal Organizations. Section 900.158 explains how to file a notice of appeal with the Interior Board of Indian Appeals and what the notice should contain; and 900.166 provides instructions for submitting a written statement of objections concerning a Administrative Law Judge’s decision. The IHS uses the information to evaluate and approve/disapprove and applicant’s appeal request. The information is collected and reported when a tribe or tribal organization requests an appeal conference, files a notice of appeal, or requests an appeal time extension, or submits objections to an Administrative Law Judge’s decision (i.e., § 900.166).
Subpart N covers the process for post-award contract disputes (i.e., §§ 900.215-230). Section 900.219 explains how Tribes or Tribal Organizations submit a Contract Disputes Act (CDA) claim. The IHS needs and uses the information to evaluate and approve/disapprove a CDA claim. The information is collected and reported as needed when such a claim is filed
Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses, and the basis for the decision for adopting this means of collection. Also describe any consideration of using information technology to reduce burden.
Tribes are able to submit some of their information electronically and systems are in place for safeguarding the information and for electronic signatures.
Describe efforts to identify duplication. Show specifically why any similar information already available cannot be used or modified for use for the purposes described in Item 2 above.
The information supplied is not duplicated in any other data collection and is unique to this program and the particular contractor. In keeping with the Paperwork Reduction Act and other statutory requirements, the information collected is the minimum needed for the intended purpose.
If the collection of information impacts small businesses or other small entities, describe any methods used to minimize burden.
Tribes and Tribal Organizations are not considered small governmental jurisdictions or small entities as defined under the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Describe the consequence to Federal program or policy activities if the collection is not conducted or is conducted less frequently, as well as any technical or legal obstacles to reducing burden.
Information is collected, as needed, when Tribes or Tribal Organizations apply for an ISDEAA contract. If the collection is not conducted or is conducted less frequently, the IHS would be unable to award ISDEAA contracts and grants, to properly administer and monitor such contracts or to carry out Department’s ISDEAA program responsibilities. There are no technical or legal obstacles to reducing burden.
Explain any special circumstances that would cause an information collection to be conducted in a manner:
* requiring respondents to report information to the agency more often than quarterly;
* requiring respondents to prepare a written response to a collection of information in fewer than 30 days after receipt of it;
* requiring respondents to submit more than an original and two copies of any document;
* requiring respondents to retain records, other than health, medical, government contract, grant-in-aid, or tax records, for more than three years;
* in connection with a statistical survey, that is not designed to produce valid and reliable results that can be generalized to the universe of study;
* requiring the use of a statistical data classification that has not been reviewed and approved by OMB;
* that includes a pledge of confidentiality that is not supported by authority established in statute or regulation, that is not supported by disclosure and data security policies that are consistent with the pledge, or which unnecessarily impedes sharing of data with other agencies for compatible confidential use; or
* requiring respondents to submit proprietary trade secrets, or other confidential information unless the agency can demonstrate that it has instituted procedures to protect the information's confidentiality to the extent permitted by law.
There are special circumstances that require exceptions to 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2). The regulations do require respondents to respond to a collection of information in fewer than 30 days when the original submission is lacking information. Section 900.15 establishes procedures the Secretary must follow upon receiving a proposal for a self-determination contract. Within 15 days of receiving the proposal, the Secretary must advise the applicant of any items which are missing from the proposal package and request that the applicant provide the missing information within 15 days. This abbreviated time schedule is necessary, as the ISDEAA only allows the Secretary a total of 90 days from the receipt of a proposal to decide whether to accept the proposal and award the contract. The 90-day timeframe is mandatory and may not be extended except with the applicant’s written permission (§ 900.17). For this reason, the Secretary must have all relevant information and documentation as soon as possible, in order to review and evaluate it prior to making a decision about approving a contract under the Act. It is important to note, however, that applicants are only requested to provide the missing information within 15 days. There are no fixed penalties for failing to respond, although failure to provide the information may, in the worst case, prevent the ultimate award of a self-determination contract.
Respondents usually provide two copies or reports. Statistics are not used and there is no confidential information or proprietary trade secrets involved with self-determination contracts.
If applicable, provide a copy and identify the date and page number of publication in the Federal Register of the agency's notice, required by 5 CFR 1320.8(d), soliciting comments on the information collection prior to submission to OMB. Summarize public comments received in response to that notice [and in response to the PRA statement associated with the collection over the past three years] and describe actions taken by the agency in response to these comments. Specifically address comments received on cost and hour burden.
A 60-day notice for public comments was published jointly with the BIA, under OMB Control No. 1076-0136, in the Federal Register on March 8, 2013 (78 FR 15035). No comments were received in response to this notice.
Describe efforts to consult with persons outside the agency to obtain their views on the availability of data, frequency of collection, the clarity of instructions and recordkeeping, disclosure, or reporting format (if any), and on the data elements to be recorded, disclosed, or reported.
Through the IHS Consultation process, the Tribes, Tribal Organizations, and IHS Direct Service Tribes Advisory Committee, consisting of Tribal leaders, provides ongoing recommendations and advice to the IHS Office of Direct Services and Contracting Tribes on these information collection activities (i.e., contracting process).
Explain any decision to provide any payment or gift to respondents, other than remuneration of contractors or grantees.
The respondents will not receive payment or gifts.
Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for the assurance in statute, regulation, or agency policy.
There is no assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents concerning this information collection.
Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature, such as sexual behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and other matters that are commonly considered private. This justification should include the reasons why the agency considers the questions necessary, the specific uses to be made of the information, the explanation to be given to persons from whom the information is requested, and any steps to be taken to obtain their consent.
There are no questions of a sensitive nature solicited in this information collection.
Provide estimates of the hour burden of the collection of information. The statement should:
* Indicate the number of respondents, frequency of response, annual hour burden, and an explanation of how the burden was estimated. Unless directed to do so, agencies should not conduct special surveys to obtain information on which to base hour burden estimates. Consultation with a sample (fewer than 10) of potential respondents is desirable. If the hour burden on respondents is expected to vary widely because of differences in activity, size, or complexity, show the range of estimated hour burden, and explain the reasons for the variance. Generally, estimates should not include burden hours for customary and usual business practices.
* If this request for approval covers more than one form, provide separate hour burden estimates for each form and aggregate the hour burdens.
* Provide estimates of annualized cost to respondents for the hour burdens for collections of information, identifying and using appropriate wage rate categories. The cost of contracting out or paying outside parties for information collection activities should not be included here. Instead, this cost should be included in Item 13.
The Indian Health Service has condensed the information collection to simplify and get accurate estimates for this collection.
Type of Review: Revision of currently approved collection.
Respondents: Federally recognized Indian Tribes and Tribal organizations.
Number of Respondents: 566
Estimated Number of Responses: 1510.
Estimated Time per Response: Varies from 1 to 1040 hours, with an average of 15.968 hours per response.
Frequency of Response: Each time programs, functions, services or activities are contracted from the IHS under the ISDEAA.
Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 24,112.
The following table provides the IHS burden hours estimates for this renewal.
IHS DataTable
|
Information Collection Request Activities/CFR Sections - Respondents are 566 Federally recognized Tribes |
Number of Respondents |
Number of Response per Respondent |
Average Burden Hour per Response |
Total Annual Burden Hours |
$ Value of Burden Hours (@ $43.18)* |
1.
|
How many Tribes or Tribal Organizations submitted an initial Self-Determination contract proposal, as required by 25 CFR § 900.8 [Includes 900.44 -55]?
|
12 |
1 |
34 |
408 |
$17,617 |
2. |
How many Tribes or Tribal organizations submitted a Self-Determination contract renewal/annual funding agreement, as required by 25 CFR Part 900?
|
241 |
2 |
35 |
16,870 |
$728,446 |
3. |
How many Tribes or Tribal Organizations submitted applications for construction projects, under Title 1 of 93-638, 25 CFR §§ 900.110-132 and other applicable provisions? |
16 |
1 |
20 |
320 |
$13,818 |
4. |
How many Tribes or Tribal Organizations submitted a written request to secure a list of the all Federal property, or request a list of specific excess Federal property intended or currently in use, to the Secretary to carry out PFSAs (25 CFR §§ 900.10, 900.11, and 900.97)? |
30 |
1 |
3 |
90 |
$3886 |
5. |
How many Tribes or Tribal Organizations submitted written requests to dispose or return Federal property to the Secretary, 25 CFR § 900.60? |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
$86 |
6.
|
How many Tribes or Tribal Organizations submitted annual audits, as required by 25 CFR §§ 900.40-41 and OMB Circular A-133? |
174 |
3 |
11 |
5742 |
$247,940 |
7. |
How many Tribes or Tribal Organizations submitted required reports (i.e., program narrative or program data reports), 25 CFR § 900.65?
|
190 |
2 |
1 |
380 |
$16,408 |
8. |
How many Tribes or Tribal Organizations submitted a claim under the Contract Disputes Act (25 CFR §§ 900.133 and 900.215-230)? |
62 |
1 |
4 |
248 |
$10,708 |
9. |
How many Tribes or Tribal Organizations submitted an appeal in response to an Agency declination (25 CFR §§ 900.31, 900.122-123, 900.133, 900.150-177, and 900.219)? |
4 |
1 |
13 |
52 |
$2,245 |
|
Totals |
|
|
1510 |
24,112 |
$1,041,154 |
*To obtain the hourly rate for tribal government employees, we used $30.84, the wages and salaries figure for all workers from BLS Release USDL 13-0421, Employer Costs for Employee Compensation—December 2012, Table 1, Employer costs per hour worked for employee compensation and costs as a percent of total compensation: Civilian workers, by major occupational and industry group, December 2012. To account for benefits, we then multiplied this rate by 1.4, to obtain a total rate of $43.18.
13. Provide an estimate of the total annual [non-hour] cost burden to respondents or recordkeepers resulting from the collection of information. (Do not include the cost of any hour burden shown in Items 12 and 14).
* The cost estimate should be split into two components: (a) a total capital and start-up cost component (annualized over its expected useful life) and (b) a total operation and maintenance and purchase of services component. The estimates should take into account costs associated with generating, maintaining, and disclosing or providing the information [including filing fees paid]. Include descriptions of methods used to estimate major cost factors including system and technology acquisition, expected useful life of capital equipment, the discount rate(s), and the time period over which costs will be incurred. Capital and start-up costs include, among other items, preparations for collecting information such as purchasing computers and software; monitoring, sampling, drilling and testing equipment; and record storage facilities.
* If cost estimates are expected to vary widely, agencies should present ranges of cost burdens and explain the reasons for the variance. The cost of purchasing or contracting out information collection services should be a part of this cost burden estimate. In developing cost burden estimates, agencies may consult with a sample of respondents (fewer than 10), utilize the 60-day pre-OMB submission public comment process and use existing economic or regulatory impact analysis associated with the rulemaking containing the information collection, as appropriate.
* Generally, estimates should not include purchases of equipment or services, or portions thereof, made: (1) prior to October 1, 1995, (2) to achieve regulatory compliance with requirements not associated with the information collection, (3) for reasons other than to provide information or keep records for the government, or (4) as part of customary and usual business or private practices.
The estimated total annual cost burden to respondents or record keepers for capital and start-up costs components (annualized over the expected useful life) for this information collection is zero. The information collection will not require the purchase of any capital equipment nor create any start-up costs because the Tribes/ Tribal Organizations are allowed to request any federal equipment used to operate the program. Computers and software used to complete this information collection are part of the respondent’s customary and usual business practices, and therefore are not included in the estimate.
The estimated total cost burden to respondents or record keepers for operation and maintenance, and purchase of services components for this information collection is zero. The information collection will not create costs associated with generating maintaining, and disclosing or providing information that is not already identified in this supporting statement.
14. Provide estimates of annualized cost to the Federal government. Also, provide a description of the method used to estimate cost, which should include quantification of hours, operational expenses (such as equipment, overhead, printing, and support staff), and any other expense that would not have been incurred without this collection of information. Agencies also may aggregate cost estimates from Items 12, 13, and 14 in a single table.
The current estimated annual cost to the government has been calculated by using the hourly rate provided by the 2013 General Schedule Annual Rates by Grade and Step – GS-11, Step 7 (28.91), and a multiplier of 1.5 for benefits for a total of $43.37.
The average work time is estimated at 2.5 hours per response. The formula used is 1, 510 X $43.37 X 2.5= $163,722.
15. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments.
There are no program changes. However, in order to obtain more reasonable burden estimates, IHS, in conjunction with BIA, updated the data table (above) to reflect actual data collection activities, rather than just the subparts/provisions cited in the earlier table. The table was sent out via a data call to IHS Area Contracting Proposal Lead Officers (CPLOs), and adjustments were made to reflect their responses. It should be noted that this Information Collection Request, OMB No. 1076-0136 was previously submitted jointly with BIA. The BIA was the lead for this collection in the past. The adjustments (decrease) in burden for this information collection request from that submitted previously to OMB is a result of program discretion, to (1) update the data through a data call to the IHS Area CPLOs to obtain more reasonable estimates and (2) submit IHS' data separately from BIA through a separate request. IHS is currently pursuing its own OMB control number.
16. For collections of information whose results will be published, outline plans for tabulation and publication. Address any complex analytical techniques that will be used. Provide the time schedule for the entire project, including beginning and ending dates of the collection of information, completion of report, publication dates, and other actions.
There is no intention to publish this information collection.
17. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of the information collection, explain the reasons that display would be inappropriate.
The IHS intends to display the expiration date with the OMB Clearance Number.
18. Explain each exception to the certification statement identified in "Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions.”.
The IHS is not seeking any exceptions.
Page
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
File Title | Supporting Statement for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions |
Author | Ruth Bajema |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 2021-01-29 |