Supporting_Statement_B1_7-24-2011

Supporting_Statement_B1_7-24-2011.docx

NIH Toolbox for Assessment of Neurological and Behavioral Function (NIA)

OMB: 0925-0638

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf




Supporting Statement B for






NIH Toolbox for Assessment of

Neurological and Behavioral Function (NIA)



April 11, 2011










Molly Wagster, Ph.D.,

Contracting Officer Technical Representative

NIH Toolbox

National Institute on Aging


Gateway Building, 350
7201 Wisconsin Ave
Bethesda, MD 20892


Telephone: 301-496-9350

Fax: 301-496-1494

E-mail: wagsterm@nia.nih.gov


Table of Contents

B. COLLECTION OF INFORMATION EMPLOYING STATISTICAL METHODS 6

B.1 Respondent Universe and Sampling Methods 6

B.2 Procedures for the Collection of Information 8

B.3 Methods to Maximize Response Rates and Deal with Nonresponse 10

B.4 Test of Procedures or Methods to be Undertaken 11

B.5 Individuals Consulted on Statistical Aspects and Individuals Collecting and/or Analyzing Data 12



List of Attachments


BATTERY OF TOOLBOX MEASURES



Sensation domain

  1. Automated Audiometry from the NIH Toolbox (AANT)

  2. Hearing Handicap Inventory

  3. Words-in-Noise (WIN)

  4. Odor Identification Ages 10-85

  5. Odor Identification Ages 3-9

  6. University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT)

  7. Pain Assessment Proxy Ages 3-7

  8. Pain Assessment Ages 8-12

  9. Pain Assessment Ages 13-17

  10. Pain Assessment Ages 18-85

  11. Sucrose Preference Test

  12. Toolbox Taste Test

  13. Dynamic Visual Acuity (DVA)

  14. Vision Health-Related Quality of Life Survey

  15. Brief Kinesthesia

  16. Pediatric Pain Scale

  17. Tactile Discrimination Test

Cognition domain

  1. Dimensional Change Card Sort

  2. Bateria III Picture Vocabulary

  3. Flanker

  4. Imitation Based Assessment of Memory (IBAM)

  5. List Sorting

  6. Oral Symbol Digit Modalities Test

  7. Pattern Comparison

  8. Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT)

  9. Reading Recognition

  10. Determining Handedness

  11. Vocabulary Comprehension

  12. Spanish Word Accentuation Test

Emotion domain

  1. Instructions for Emotional Health Questionnaire

  2. Emotional Health Questionnaires for Toolbox

  3. Supplemental Emotional Health Questionnaires

Motor functioning domain

  1. 9 Hole Pegboard

  2. Endurance 2 Minute Walk Test (2MWT)

  3. Locomotion 4 Meter Walk Test

  4. Grip Strength Dynamometry

  5. Strength HHD Knee Extension

  6. Balance Accelerometer Measure (BAM)


ADDITIONAL MEASURES

  1. Initial Questionnaire - ADULT

  2. Initial Questionnaire - PROXY and CHILD

  3. Additional Somatosensation Questions

  4. Additional Audition Olfaction Taste Questions

  5. Cognition Information Form

  6. Health Care Access and Utilization

  7. Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) - Adults

  8. Applied Cognition - Adult

  9. Pediatric Perceived Cognitive Function (PCF) - Child

  10. Pediatric Perceived Cognitive Function (PCF) - Proxy

  11. PROMIS Pediatric Physical Function Upper Extremity

  12. PROMIS Pediatric Physical Function Mobility

  13. Pediatric Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy – Fatigue (FACIT-F)

  14. PROMIS 29 - Participant

  15. School Performance and Activities

  16. Sociodemographic Form – Parent

  17. Test Anxiety Scale (TAS)

  18. Falls Efficacy Scale - International (Short FES-I)

  19. EtOH Questionnaire

  20. Education Adult Self-Report

  21. Education Proxy Report for Children



RECRUITMENT MATERIALS

  1. Recruitment Instructions, Scripts and Letters

REGULATORY DOCUMENTS

  1. Certificate of Confidentiality

  2. Northwestern University IRB Approval Letter

  3. Consent Documents



OTHER DOCUMENTS

  1. Team Member Contact List

  2. NIH Privacy Act Review Memo

  3. NIH Privacy Act Systems of Record 09-25-0200







B. COLLECTION OF INFORMATION EMPLOYING STATISTICAL METHODS

B.1 Respondent Universe and Sampling Methods

The instruments in the NIH Toolbox are designed primarily for use in a Target Population with the following characteristics:

  1. General non-institutionalized population dwelling in the community

  2. Ages 3-85 years

  3. Availability of a proxy respondent for pediatric population

  4. Capable of following instructions given in English or Spanish and understanding the informed consent process

  5. Adequate visual, auditory, vestibular, or motor functioning or availability of assistance or assist devices is required to complete some of the items in the test battery


This target population is estimated to include approximately all 283,764,466 civilian noninstitutionalized individuals ages 3-85 years in the United States. A total of 8,400 individuals and 4,500 parent-proxies will be sampled from this population. Distribution of the sample and the respondent universe across the strata are presented in Table B.1.1. The accrual vendor’s existing recruitment database of 492,008 subjects will be randomly sampled and screened for household members’ age, gender, race/ethnicity, education and primary language. We expect that approximately 15% of the eligible individuals will agree to participate and 85% of the selected participants will actually complete the tests successfully.

Table B.1.1. Distribution of Respondent Universe And Proposed Sample Across Strata




Universe1

Sample

Total

283,764,466

8400


Males

139,361,273

4200

Females

144,403,193

4200


English-speaking2

232,686,862

5850

Spanish-speaking2

31,214091

2550


Age 3

4,168,945

300

Age 4

4,122,392

300

Age 5

4,133,901

300

Age 6

4,072,774

300

Age 7

4,060,824

300

Age 8

4,104,423

300

Age 9

3,921,722

300

Age 10

3,922,622

300

Age 11

3,908,905

300

Age 12

3,946,112

300

Age 13

4,032,341

300

Age 14

4,071,443

300

Age 15

4,106,574

300

Age 16

4,191,736

300

Age 17

4,250,817

300

Age 18-29

49,965,595

600

Age 30-39

39,581,409

600

Age 40-49

43,459,875

600

Age 50-59

40,494,881

600

Age 60-69

27,275,851

600

Age 70-85

21,971,324

900






The NIH Toolbox sample frame (see tables below) will be draw from the Delve sample.The sample frame was derived from the 2010 Census (respective to each age group). The Delve database is updated in a process involving continuous recruitment. The Delve sample has been evaluated over the last two weeks and has been confirmed to meet the needs of our sample frame (including oversampling required to insure final completes) without further revision.. No revisions to the sample or frame are predicted given the very short accrual period to follow (<3 months).

Adults:

Age


Race / Ethnicity*

Educational Attainment

18 - 29

19% H, 15% B, 4% A, 3% O

16% Less, 29% HS, 55% More

30 - 39

19% H, 14% B, 6% A, 3% O

12% Less, 27% HS, 61% More

40 - 49

14% H, 13% B, 5% A, 2% O

11% Less, 31% HS, 58% More

50 - 59

10% H, 12% B, 4% A, 2% O

11% Less, 31% HS, 58% More

60 - 69

8% H, 10% B, 4% A, 2% O

13% Less, 32% HS, 54% More

70 - 79



7% H, 9% B, 4% A, 1% O


24% Less, 37% HS, 39% More

80 - 85

Total



* Race / ethnicity quotas apply to English-speaking group only, it is expected that the Spanish-speaking group will be almost entirely Hispanic. H=Hispanic, B=Black, A=Asian, O=Other, includes American Indian, Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander and individuals with 2 or more races.



Children:

Age


Race / Ethnicity*

Highest Educated Parent’s Educational Attainment

3

25% H, 15% B, 5% A, 5% O

16% Less, 29% HS, 55% More

4

25% H, 15% B, 5% A, 5% O

16% Less, 29% HS, 55% More

5

23% H, 14% B, 5% A, 5% O

12% Less, 27% HS, 61% More

6

23% H, 14% B, 5% A, 5% O

12% Less, 27% HS, 61% More

7

23% H, 14% B, 5% A, 5% O

12% Less, 27% HS, 61% More

8

23% H, 14% B, 5% A, 5% O

12% Less, 27% HS, 61% More

9

23% H, 14% B, 5% A, 5% O

12% Less, 27% HS, 61% More

10

20% H, 15% B, 4% A, 4% O

12% Less, 27% HS, 61% More

11

20% H, 15% B, 4% A, 4% O

12% Less, 27% HS, 61% More


12


20% H, 15% B, 4% A, 4% O

12% Less, 27% HS, 61% More

13

20% H, 15% B, 4% A, 4% O

12% Less, 27% HS, 61% More

14

20% H, 15% B, 4% A, 4% O

12% Less, 27% HS, 61% More

15

19% H, 16% B, 4% A, 4% O

11% Less, 31% HS, 58% More

16

19% H, 16% B, 4% A, 4% O

11% Less, 31% HS, 58% More

17

19% H, 16% B, 4% A, 4% O

11% Less, 31% HS, 58% More

Total









B.2 Procedures for the Collection of Information

Existing recruitment databases will be randomly sampled and screened for household members’ age, gender, race/ethnicity, education and primary language. This will be done by Delve, the marketing research firm which will conduct the data collection activities. The goal is to accrue 150 participants for each of the adult cells, defined by age, gender, and language; and 75 participants in each of the child cells, as shown in Tables B2.1 and B2.2. Since very few school age children speak Spanish as their dominant language, this sample will not include Spanish speakers age 8-17, but additional English speaking children will be recruited to maintain the overall sample size across ages. The single-year age increments in the children are designed to capture the rapid developmental change that occurs during childhood, while the adult age groups were similarly designed to correspond with accepted periods of transition and decline. The ultimate goal of this project is to provide normative reference values that will be acceptable to the epidemiological and clinical research community. . The data collected in this study will provide needed normative values for sensory, motor, cognitive, and emotional function that are relevant and generalizable to community based samples of children, adolescents, adults and older adults of both genders, with varying educational levels, from urban and suburban locales, for both English or Spanish preferred language populations. Therefore, this sample size per cell was selected based on the precedent of other norming studies, in particular the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. This sample size also provides sufficient precision in the estimates of within-cell normative values. In many instances precision will be improved by combining English and Spanish-speaking cells and/or combining males and females within an age group. For certain tests, such as the Reading and Vocabulary components of the Cognition domain, it will be important to provide normative values separately for English and Spanish-speakers, whereas for Motor domain measures this distinction is not necessary and the language groups may be combined for increased precision. Similarly, some instuments may warrant gender-specific normative values while other instruments will not. For the smallest cells of size 75, the 95% confidence interval for the cell mean will be estimated with a precision of ± 0.23 standard deviation units. Cells of size 150 will have precision of ±0.16, size of 300 corresponds to precision of ±0.11, size of 600 corresponds to precision of ±0.08, and size of 900 corresponds to precision of ±0.06. This provides us with precision of ±0.20 or better for all but the smallest cell size. It is widely accepted in the minimally important difference literature on patient-reported outcomes that differences less than 0.20 standard deviation units (a small effect size according to accepted criteria) are unlikely to be meaningful differences. The cells that are rarest in the U.S. population are the Spanish-speaking child and elderly cells.


Table B2.1. Target Completes for Children by Cell



Age

English

Spanish

Total

Male

Female

Male

Female

3

75

75

75

75

300

4

75

75

75

75

300

5

75

75

75

75

300

6

75

75

75

75

300

7

75

75

75

75

300

8

150

150

0

0

300

9

150

150

0

0

300

10

150

150

0

0

300

11

150

150

0

0

300

12

150

150

0

0

300

13

150

150

0

0

300

14

150

150

0

0

300

15

150

150

0

0

300

16

150

150

0

0

300

17

150

150

0

0

300

Total

1875

1875

375

375

4500



Table B2.2. Target Completes for Adults by Cell



Age

English

Spanish

Total

Male

Female

Male

Female

18-29

150

150

150

150

600

30-39

150

150

150

150

600

40-49

150

150

150

150

600

50-59

150

150

150

150

600

60-69

150

150

150

150

600

70-79

150

150

150

150

900

80-85

150

150

Total

1050

1050

900

900

3,900



We plan to stratify the recruitment databases into strata corresponding to testing cells defined by age, sex, and language. We will select a sample of persons from those databases for participation in the study. We will select a conditionally equal probability sample of persons from each stratum. Interviewers will contact the households to recruit the selected persons into the study. We expect to potentially recruit multiple persons from some households, particularly from larger households containing members of the rarer cells, although we are not explicitly controlling for the number of persons per household.

Participants will complete a small portion of the assessment on paper prior to their scheduled visit. Trained Delve technicians will then administer the Toolbox measures to adult participants, child participants, and proxies, as appropriate. For one-week test-retest reliability testing, 375 children (and their parents for proxy measures) and 375 adults will be randomly selected and asked to schedule another appointment at which the Toolbox measures will be re-administered. Another 375 children (and their parents for proxy measures) and 375 adults will be randomly selected to be contacted by telephone to schedule a 3-month follow-up appointment to evaluate change in the Toolbox measures.

B.3 Methods to Maximize Response Rates and Deal with Nonresponse

We have assumed that approximately 85% of the selected participants will actually complete the tests successfully. To achieve this response rate, in addition to offering geographically appropriate compensation, we will provide scheduled respondents with a detailed packet of information regarding what they can expect on the day of testing, directions to the testing site, and a telephone number to call if they have questions regarding the study (see Attachment 60). They will also receive a telephone call reminding them of their appointment 2-3 days in advance and offering them the opportunity to reschedule if the scheduled appointment is no longer convenient. Respondents who are unable to travel to the testing location due to the financial burden or unavailability of transportation will be provided compensation for travel. In addition, selected respondents who do not keep their testing appointment will receive a call offering them the opportunity to reschedule. These techniques combined will serve to maximize respondent cooperation. The 15% that do not complete the study may drop out in a variety of ways—not completing the telephone questionnaire and confirming eligibility, not giving parental consent, not showing up for the tests, etc. The tests require the participants to go to a testing site for about three hours of tests, which is not conducive to a higher response rate, even with compensation. This response rate is consistent with the OMB minimum acceptable response rate, and furthermore, the design provides an adequate number of respondents in rare population cells to accurately norm the measures.

We will do a nonresponse bias analysis. The sample will be selected disproportionately to achieve the target numbers within each cell, and the cases for a cell will not be combined with cases from other cells (with the possible exception of Spanish-speaking elderly). Therefore, the nonresponse bias of interest is strictly within each cell. We will compare the weighted respondents to the total U.S. for the same age, gender, and language for a very limited set of demographics available, such as geographical region, household income, and household size.

B.4 Test of Procedures or Methods to be Undertaken

All of the measures administered as part of the assessment have undergone extensive review as part of their development and no additional testing of the procedures is planned under the scope of this proposed survey. The Toolbox measures are located in Attachments 1-38, and the additional measures are located in Attachments 39-59.



B.5 Individuals Consulted on Statistical Aspects and Individuals Collecting and/or Analyzing Data


Role

Name

Affiliation

Telephone number



Consultation on design aspects

Jennifer Beaumont, MS

NU-MSS

312-503-9805

Richard Havlik, MD, MPH

Westat

301-652-3427

Ron Hays, PhD

UCLA

310-794-2294

Kay Savio

Delve

314-851-3116

Kim Reale

Delve

314-851-3124

Interviewing contractor

Judy Golas

Delve

740-392-9436



Data analysis

Jennifer Beaumont, MS

NU-MSS

312-695-1324

Richard Havlik, MD, MPH

Westat

301-503-9805

Ron Hays, PhD

UCLA

310-794-2294

Devin Peipert, MSW

NU-MSS

312-503-3647 end_of_the_skype_highlighting

Katy Wortman, MSW

NU-MSS

312-503-3609 end_of_the_skype_highlighting

James Burns, MS

NU-MSS

312-503-3380 end_of_the_skype_highlighting

Seung Choi, PhD

NU-MSS

312-503-9803 end_of_the_skype_highlighting

Jin-Shei Lai, PhD, OTR/L

NU-MSS

312-503-3370 end_of_the_skype_highlighting

Richard Gershon, PhD

NU-MSS

312-503-3453 end_of_the_skype_highlighting

Natalie McKinney, BA

NU-MSS

312-503-3909 end_of_the_skype_highlighting

Tracy Podrabsky, BS

NU-MSS

312-503-3908 end_of_the_skype_highlighting

Jamie Griffith, PhD

NU-MSS

312-503-3538 end_of_the_skype_highlighting

Elizabeth Hahn, MA

NU-MSS

312-503-9804 end_of_the_skype_highlighting




1 US Census Bureau Civilian Noninstitutionalized Population estimates for 5/1/2009

2 Estimated using percentages reported in Census 2000 Brief: Language Use and English-Speaking Ability: 2000



16


File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-02-01

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy