2012-2013 CCDF PrePrint Public comments Indiana

2012-2013 CCDF PrePrint Public comments Indiana.xls

Child Care and Development Fund Plan for States/Territories for FY 2012-2013

2012-2013 CCDF PrePrint Public comments Indiana

OMB: 0970-0114

Document [xlsx]
Download: xlsx | pdf
Section Comment


Part 1
1.2.2 Include non-committal language for use of funds
1.4.3 What is the definition of Fraud and Administrative Error? For Indiana fraud is determined by a court of law.
1.5.3 not sure what is innovative and what is regular Indiana practice
1.7.2 For those States that do not have and Emergency Plan developed boxes should be added to include " N/A" and "Other"


Part 2
2.2.4 add NA
2.3.4 A statement should be added that states "check all that apply" Indiana would have more than one answer to this question
2.6.3 An answer choice should include whether a standard policy exists?
2.6.5 need more clarification here on range
Part 3
3.1.1 Plan definitions for group home and family child care home are not consistent with state definitions and data available.
3.1.2 Need clarification as to what is meant by describe and how to fit that into these boxes
3.1.2c include what is offered as well as required
3.1.3 include column for unlicensed but certified to receive ccdf
3.1.4a We can not report on the number of programs operating that are legally exempt from licensure. States collect injury data differently. Will each state use their own definition for reporting?
3.2.7 The info requested about child assessment and evaluation of the ELG is outside the scope of the lead agency's role- Indiana DOE is lead agency
3.3 We are happy to report on our state's QRIS but is seems that these systems are very different between states. Wouldn't you want more detailed info about each system and how it operates in the state (at least a website link) and the number enrolled? If the 5 key elements are not included in a state system, does that mean it is not considered a QRIS?
3.4.1 Our state has EC educational requirements ie CDA, AA, BA. Does not seem to fit into this section.


Appendix
1.2.5 can't answer this question because licensed exempt providers are not tracked/offer NA for each of these questions
1.2.6 how are injuries defined, we track for some not all, need more clarification
2.2.1 We can not drill down to the actual number of children, rather numbers based on capacity. How is implementing being defined
4.2.2 need NA for those states without a registry
4.2.3 will only know this for providers that used CCDF funds to help pay for tuition, need space for clarification of this
4.2.4 will only know this for providers that used CCDF funds to help pay for tuition, need space for clarification of this
4.2.5 may know number of programs rather than individual staff, would like to be able to report it this way
File Typeapplication/vnd.ms-excel
Authorkolbusl2
Last Modified Bybrizzim
File Modified2010-11-23
File Created2010-11-18

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy