Manufactured Food Regulatory Program Standards

ICR 201008-0910-008

OMB: 0910-0601

Federal Form Document

Forms and Documents
Document
Name
Status
Supporting Statement A
2010-08-17
IC Document Collections
ICR Details
0910-0601 201008-0910-008
Historical Active 200702-0910-002
HHS/FDA
Manufactured Food Regulatory Program Standards
Reinstatement with change of a previously approved collection   No
Regular
Approved without change 09/15/2010
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA) 08/26/2010
  Inventory as of this Action Requested Previously Approved
09/30/2013 36 Months From Approved
62 0 0
8,160 0 0
0 0 0

In June 2000, the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General (OIG) recommended that FDA improve its oversight of food firm inspections conducted by States through contracts. Consequently, FDA developed the Manufactured Food Regulatory Program Standards (program standards), which establish a uniform foundation for the design and management of a State program that is responsible for the regulatory oversight of food plants that manufacture, process, pack, or hold foods in the United States. Achieving conformance with these program standards requires comprehensive self-assessment of the State program. Each standard has corresponding self-assessment worksheets, and certain standards have supplemental worksheets and forms that will assist the State programs in determining their level of conformance with the standard. The State program is not required to use the forms and worksheets for the standard; however, alternative forms should be equivalent to the forms and worksheets in the program standards. FDA needs the data from the forms and worksheets to assess the State program's conformance with the program standards and to improve contracts with State agencies. Ultimately, the program standards will assist both FDA and the States in fulfilling their regulatory obligations.

US Code: 42 USC 241.301 Name of Law: PHS Act
  
None

Not associated with rulemaking

  74 FR 63154 12/02/2009
75 FR 9605 03/03/2010
No

2
IC Title Form No. Form Name
Manufactured Food Regulatory Program Standards
Manufactured Food Regulatory Program Standards

  Total Approved Previously Approved Change Due to New Statute Change Due to Agency Discretion Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses 62 0 0 2 0 60
Annual Time Burden (Hours) 8,160 0 0 7,160 0 1,000
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Yes
Miscellaneous Actions
Yes
Miscellaneous Actions
The hours per response increased because the Baseline Self-Assessment includes developing a strategic plan to fully implement the standards. FDA reduced the estimated first-year baseline self-assessment burden when it replaced the verification audit performed by the State with a program assessment validation audit that would be done by FDA. However, the burden was increased because States needed additional time to obtain the documents needed to conduct their self-assessment. Additionally, in the past FDA had always beleived that the recordkeeping was usual and customary. We learned from the program assessment validation audits of 15 states that the States were not keeping records on a usual and customary basis.

$1,100,000
No
No
No
Uncollected
No
Uncollected
Daniel Gitteson 3017965156 daniel.gitteson@fda.hhs.gov

  No

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    (i) Why the information is being collected;
    (ii) Use of information;
    (iii) Burden estimate;
    (iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
    (v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
    (vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
 
 
 
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
08/26/2010


© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy