Supporting Statement for
Abbreviated New Animal Drug Applications and Form FDA 356V
1. Circumstances Making the Collection of Information Necessary
On November 16, 1988, the President signed into law the Generic Animal Drug and Patent Restoration Act (GADPTRA)(P.L. 100-670). Among its provisions, GADPTRA extends eligibility for submission of Abbreviated New Animal Drug Applications (ANADAs) to all animal drug products approved for safety and effectiveness under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act).
GADPTRA provides 5 years of exclusivity for the first-time approval of a drug in animals (section 512(c)(2)(F) of the act) (21 U.S.C. 360b(c)(2)(F)). In enacting GADPTRA, Congress indicated that it viewed this term of exclusivity as a sufficient return on investment prior to generic competition to provide an incentive for the pioneer sponsor to develop a drug. This statute resulted in the need for a new information collection as described below.
FDA Form 356V- Application for Approval of a New Animal Drug –
Data collection instrument that must be filled out to ensure
efficient and accurate processing of information to support the
approval of a generic new animal drug.
2. Purpose and Use of the Information Collection
Required information to
support an ANADA or supplemental ANADA is accompanied by an FDA Form
356V – Application for Approval of a New Animal Drug. The
information submitted is reviewed by professional personnel in the
Center for Veterinary Medicine, in the FDA, including veterinarians,
chemists, microbiologists, toxicologists, physiologists,
pharmacologists, nutritionists, statisticians, consumer safety
officers, and paid FDA consultants, as necessary, to determine if an
ANADA can be approved. In order to get approval of an ANADA, the
applicant must, among other things, demonstrate that the proposed
ANADA is bioequivalent to its referenced listed drug.
3. Use of Improved
Information Technology and Burden Reduction
FDA
accepts the submission of some data to support ANADAs and supplements
electronically.
4. Effort to Identify
Duplication and Use of Similar Information
The
information as provided in an ANADA is unique to the particular
product covered by the application. There are no other regulations
that require the submission of this same information. The
information is generally not available from any recognized scientific
sources, unless the information has been made public by the ANADA
applicant.
5. Impact on Small
Businesses or Other Small Entities
FDA
does assist small businesses to meet the application requirements
through the Office of Small Manufacturers Association through the
scientific and administrative staff within the Center.
6. Consequences of
Collecting the Information Less Frequently
There
are no specific regulatory time frames imposed on an applicant for
submitting an application or supplement. After the initial
submission of an application, the applicant can submit any required
information as he/she sees fit or as may be imposed by the
regulations under 21 CFR parts 514, 211, 225, or 226.
7. Special Circumstances Relating to the Guidelines of 5 CFR 1320.5
There are no reports required
to be submitted which are inconsistent with 5 CFR 1320.5.
10. Assurance of
Confidentiality Provided to Respondents
Only
FDA employees and contractors have access to the administrative files
on a need to know basis during working hours. During duty and
non-duty hours building security is provided through a contract with
a private protection agency. None of these provisions bar the
release of the confidential information if subpoenaed by a court of
law or consistent with relevant disclosure laws. The unauthorized
use or disclosure of trade secrets required in applications is
specifically prohibited under section 310(j) of the act.
11. Justification of
Sensitive Questions
This
information collection does not contain questions of a sensitive
nature.
12A. Estimates of
Annualized Burden Hours and Costs
Table 1 – Estimated Annual Reporting Burden1
Section 512(n)(1) of the FD&C Act |
Form FDA |
No. of Respondents |
Annual Frequency per Response |
Total Annual Responses |
Hours per Response |
Total Hours |
ANADA |
356v |
17 |
1 |
17 |
159 |
2703 |
Phased Review With Administrative ANADA |
356v |
5 |
5 |
25 |
31.8 |
795 |
TOTAL |
|
|
|
|
|
3498 |
1 There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
ANADA paperwork burden Section 512 (n)(1)of the act(21 U.S.C. 360b(b)(2)). Over the past 5 fiscal years, from October 2003 through September 2008, FDA has received an average of 17 ANADAs per year. FDA estimates that preparation an ANADA required under section 512(n)(1) of the act, to take approximately 159 hours. Thus the total annual reporting burden is estimated to be 2,703 hours, ( 17 x 159 = 2703 hours.). For the applicant who submits information for Phased Review followed by an Administrative ANADA which references that information, and FDA has determined that all the applicable technical sections are complete, FDA estimates that it takes 31.8 hours for preparing the paperwork under section 512 (n)(1) of the act. FDA is estimating that each ANADA that uses the phased review process, will have approximately 5 phased reviews per application. Therefore, assuming that 5 respondents will take advantage of the phased review option per year and an average of 5 phased review are submitted per application , the total annual reporting burden is estimated to be 795 hours per Administrative ANADA, ( 25 x 31.8 = 795 hours). Thus, the total annual reporting burden hours for the submission of an ANADA / Phased Review with Administrative ANADA is estimated to be 3,498 hours,, ( 2,703 hrs + 795 hrs = 3,498 hrs)
FDA believes that with time, more sponsors will take advantage of the phase review option, as it provides greater flexibility. Eventually, phased review will increase to the point of being the majority of ANADAs submitted during the course of the year. FDA also estimates it takes sponsors
of ANADAs approximately 25% less time to put together the information to support an ANADA than an NADA because they only need to provide evidence of bioequivalence and not the data required in an NADA to support full demonstration of safety and effectiveness.
Form FDA 356v. FDA requests that an applicant fill out and send in with an ANADA and Requests for Phased Review of data to support an ANADAs, a Form FDA 356v to ensure efficient and accurate processing of information to support the approval of a generic new animal drug.
This document also refers to previously approved collections of information found in FDA regulations. The collections of information under 21 CFR 514.80, which describes records and reports that are required post approval, have been approved under OMB control No. 0910-0284.
12b. Annualized Cost Burden Estimate
Type of Respondent |
Total Burden Hours |
Hourly Wage Rate |
Total Respondent Cost |
Animal Drug Sponsor |
3,498 |
$38.00 |
$132,924.00 |
13.
Estimates of Other Total Annual Costs to Respondents and Record
Keepers
There
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated
with this collection. There are no other annual costs to respondents
than those addressed in item 12 above.
14, Annualized Cost to the Federal Government
For calendar year 2008, we expended approximately 26,208 staff hours in reviewing ANADA applications and 3,000 hours of supervisory support of this review. We estimate a compensation cost of $44.43 for reviewers (2009 Washington Metro Area pay scale), which is the salary of a GS13/3, the average grade among the personnel involved in the review. Multiplying this figure by 26,208 = $1,164,121.44 as the cost for one year of review work.
The cost of supervisory review is 3,000 hours times $49.22 per hour for a GS-14/1 = $147,660. Total annual cost to the federal government for this information collection is $1,312,081.44.
15. Explanation for Program Changes or Adjustments
Passage of GADPTRA resulted in a program change requiring this new information collection.
16. Plans for Tabulation and Publication and Project Time Schedule
There are no plans for tabulation or project time schedule.
17. Reason Display of OMB Expiration Date is Inappropriate
FDA is not seeking an exemption from displaying the expiration date for OMB approval
18. Exceptions to Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions
There are no exceptions to Item 19 of OMB Form 83-I.
B. Statistical Methods
Information is not to be published for statistical use.
File Type | application/msword |
File Title | Supporting Statement for |
Author | Joanna Capezzuto |
Last Modified By | DPresley |
File Modified | 2010-03-23 |
File Created | 2010-03-23 |