This information
collection request is approved, consistent with ACF's assurance
that it has fully satisfied the previous terms of clearance. Should
ACF make any changes to the instruments or methodology during the
course of the evaluation, it will submit a revised request to OMB
for approval.
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
04/30/2011
36 Months From Approved
04/30/2008
172
0
172
259
0
259
0
0
6,230
The questionnaires are part of a
contract that addresses an evaluation of grantees that oversee
programs administered by OCS: Community Economic Development (CED)
and Job Opportunities for Low-Income Individuals (JOLI). The
Legislative requirement for the CED program, is in Title IV of the
Community Opportunities, Accountability, and Training and
Educational Services Act (COATS Human Services Reauthorization Act)
of Oct. 27, 1998, Pub. L. 105-285, section 680(b) as amended. This
legislative directive states that "The Secretary shall require all
activities receiving assistance under this section to be evaluated
for their effectiveness. Funding for such evaluations shall be
provided as a stated percentage of the assistance or through a
separate grant awarded by the Secretary specifically for the
purpose of evaluation of a particular activity or group of
activities." OCS has chosen to evaluate the programs through a
separate contract awarded by the Secretary using the Office of
Management and Budget's (OMB) Performance Assessment Rating Tool
(PART) in order to critically review the overall design and
effectiveness of each program in its totality. The evaluation
initiative contract provides the central office with the mechanism
to ensure that all programs evaluated will have consistent data
that is in agreement with the direction of OMB and provides the
Secretary with information on program efficiency and effectiveness.
The evaluation questionnaire's primary purpose is to document and
systematically evaluate the program performance of two OCS
discretionary grant programs in qualitative and quantitative terms.
Each of the two OCS discretionary grant programs CED and JOLI--will
be assessed using qualitative and quantitative evaluation methods
that capture key information about program and grantee-level
performance in four general areas: (1) Program purpose and design;
(2) strategic planning; (3) program management; and (4) program
results-PART-(specific areas).
PL:
Pub.L. 105 - 285 680(b) Name of Law: Urban and Rural Community
Economic Development Program
PL:
Pub.L. 104 - 193 505 Name of Law: Modications to the Job
Opportunities for Certain Low-Income Individuals Program
The CED program evaluation has
legislative authority, which is Title IV of the Community
Opportunities, Accountability, Training and Educational Services
(COATS) Human Services Reauthorization Act of October 27, 1998,
(Public Law 105-285, section 680 (b) as amended. This legislative
directive states that "the Secretary shall require all activities
receiving assistance under this section to be evaluated for their
effectiveness." The JOLI program evaluation and assessment will
evaluate program effectiveness to measures project performance and
to establish program policy, that is currently needed for OCS/JOLI
management and decision-making on the program.
$9,345
No
No
Uncollected
Uncollected
Uncollected
Uncollected
Robert Sargis
2026907275
No
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.