Methods for Conducting Personal Conferences When Waiver of Recovery of a Title II or Title XVI Overpayment Cannot Be Approved --NPRM 3320

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 42 / Monday, March 5, 2007 / Proposed Rules

erjones on PRODPC74 with PROPOSALS

obtain information relevant to local
implementation. Pennsylvania officials
described a comprehensive program,
mandated by Pennsylvania law, for
licensed day care facilities that
substantially enhances the existing
emergency preparedness posture that
was previously found by DHS to
provide reasonable assurance that
adequate protective measures will be
taken for the public, including children
in day care facilities.
The NRC staff provided the
Commission the results of this
assessment and other related initiatives
in a Commission paper dated May 4,
2006 (SECY–06–0101; ML060760586).
The staff found no sufficient basis to
question the adequacy of DHS findings
regarding reasonable assurance. The
staff believes the DHS findings are
consistent with the planning standards
of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and the existing
memorandum of understanding between
NRC and DHS. The staff also included
a recommendation to republish the
December 19, 2005, Federal Register
Notice with revisions to correct factual
errors and clarify NRC’s regulatory
positions and bases in the petition
denial. This recommendation afforded
the Commission an opportunity to
reconsider its earlier denial of the
petition. The Commission found no
basis for changing its earlier denial, and
in an SRM dated June 21, 2006
(ML061720324), the Commission
directed the staff to publish the
amended Federal Register Notice. The
amended notice was published on
August 7, 2006 (71 FR 44593).
Reasons for Denial
The Commission is denying the
petition for the following reasons. The
petition does not provide significant
new information or arguments that were
not previously considered by the
Commission in denying PRM–50–79. As
stated above, the petition relies upon a
DPO, which focused on the adequacy of
preplanned evacuation resources and
preplanned relocation centers for day
care centers and nursery schools within
the Commonwealth, and on whether the
Commonwealth and DHS/FEMA
complied with DHS/FEMA guidance.
The proposed remedy of the petitioner
is for the NRC to grant the petition for
rulemaking (PRM–50–79), commence a
rulemaking to incorporate the criteria in
GM EV–2 into the NRC’s emergency
planning regulations, and to implement
the 120-day clock provisions of 10 CFR
50.54(s)(2) while the rulemaking is in
progress. However, the nature of the
issues raised in the DPO would not
provide a basis for the petitioner’s
remedy. The DPO raised issues about

VerDate Aug<31>2005

15:28 Mar 02, 2007

Jkt 211001

local implementation of the
requirements and guidance, and DHS/
FEMA evaluation of local
implementation, neither of which could
be resolved by the petitioner’s proposal
that the GM EV–2 criteria be
incorporated into NRC regulations.3 GM
EV–2 is a guidance document developed
by FEMA and utilized by the DHS,
which has primary responsibility for
assessing the adequacy of offsite
emergency preparedness 4. NRC bases
its own findings in part on a review of
DHS’s findings and determinations as to
whether State and local emergency
plans are adequate and whether there is
reasonable assurance that they can be
implemented.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 26th day
of February 2007.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Annette L. Vietti-Cook,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. E7–3822 Filed 3–2–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
20 CFR Parts 404 and 416
[Docket No. SSA–2006–0096]
RIN 0960–AG40

Methods for Conducting Personal
Conferences When Waiver of Recovery
of a Title II or Title XVI Overpayment
Cannot Be Approved
Social Security Administration.
Proposed rules.

AGENCY:
ACTION:

We propose to revise our title
II regulations and add title XVI
regulations on personal conferences
when waiver of recovery of an
overpayment cannot be approved. These
proposed rules would allow for the
conferences to be conducted face-toface, by telephone, or by video
teleconference in these circumstances.
DATES: To be sure that we consider your
comments, we must receive them by
May 4, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may give us your
comments: by Internet through the
SUMMARY:

3 The Commission has, in the October 26, 2005
SRM on SECY–05–0045, directed the staff to
develop guidance and expectations for the NRC
review of FEMA’s assessment and findings of offsite
emergency preparedness. This activity should
address the petitioner’s and the DPO’s issues with
respect to the adequacy of FEMA/DHS evaluation
of local implementation of offsite emergency
preparedness.
4 The Security and Accountability for Every Port
Act of 2006, Public Law 109–347, provides that the
DHS radiological emergency preparedness program
will be transferred back to FEMA as of April 1,
2007.

PO 00000

Frm 00002

Fmt 4702

Sfmt 4702

9709

Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://
www.regulations.gov; by e-mail to
regulations@ssa.gov; by telefax to (410)
966–2830; or by letter to the
Commissioner of Social Security, P.O.
Box 17703, Baltimore, Maryland 21235–
7703. You may also deliver them to the
Office of Regulations, Social Security
Administration, 107 Altmeyer Building,
6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore,
Maryland 21235–6401, between 8 a.m.
and 4:30 p.m. on regular business days.
Comments are posted on the Federal
eRulemaking Portal. You may also
inspect the comments on regular
business days by making arrangements
with the contact person shown in this
preamble.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robin Strauss, Social Insurance
Specialist, Office of Income Security
Programs, Social Security
Administration, 252 Altmeyer Building,
6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD
21235–6401, (410) 965–7944 or TTY
(410) 966–5609, for information about
this notice. For information on
eligibility or filing for benefits, call our
national toll-free number, 1–800–772–
1213 or TTY 1–800–325–0778, or visit
our Internet site, Social Security Online,
at http://www.socialsecurity.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Version
The electronic file of this document is
available on the date of publication in
the Federal Register at http://
www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/index.html.
Background
Our existing regulations at § 404.506
state that we will waive recovery of an
overpayment if the individual was
without fault in causing the
overpayment and if recovery would
defeat the purpose of the Social Security
Act or be against equity and good
conscience. Section 404.506 further
states that, if we cannot approve waiver
after reviewing the information the
individual has given to support his or
her contention that the recovery of the
overpayment should be waived, we will
offer the individual a personal
conference. The personal conference
policy was established so that the
decisionmaker would have the
opportunity to assess an individual’s
contention through personal, versus
written, contact. Our existing
regulations at § 416.550 state that we
will waive recovery of an overpayment
if the individual was without fault in
causing the overpayment and if recovery
would either defeat the purpose of title
XVI, or be against equity and good
conscience, or impede the efficient

E:\FR\FM\05MRP1.SGM

05MRP1

erjones on PRODPC74 with PROPOSALS

9710

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 42 / Monday, March 5, 2007 / Proposed Rules

administration of title XVI. There is
currently no title XVI regulation
regarding personal conferences.
Section 404.506(e)(1) states that the
individual is given the opportunity to
‘‘appear personally’’ at the personal
conference. Current regulations do not
further specify the method in which this
appearance may be made. Our
longstanding policy contained in Social
Security Ruling (SSR) 94–4p which
implemented the decisions in
Buffington, et. al. v. Schweiker and
Califano v. Yamasaki, provides that a
face-to-face pre-recoupment hearing will
be conducted prior to the denial of
waiver of recovery of an overpayment.
However, a face-to-face appearance at
the field office is not always convenient
for the beneficiary. Often, if an
individual is not able to come to the
face-to-face conference, field office
personnel will go to the person to hold
the conference. Offering additional
appearance options for the conference
would improve service to the
beneficiaries and reduce costly home
visits by field personnel.
In order to fulfill our stewardship
responsibilities to the Social Security
trust fund, we must employ methods
that will simplify our personal
conference procedures and use our
resources most efficiently. We should be
using all available technology when we
conduct personal conferences.
Therefore, we propose to revise the
regulations to allow for personal
conferences to be conducted face-to-face
at a place we designate (usually in the
field office), by telephone, or by video
teleconference. We will give the choice
to the individual; the individual will
still be provided the opportunity to
appear face-to-face by choosing to come
to us for the personal conference, or
may choose to participate by telephone
or video teleconference. If the
individual elects to conduct the
personal conference by video
teleconference, the individual will
designate the location for his or her end
of the video teleconference. We will
designate the location for our end of the
video teleconference, if video
teleconferencing is feasible, e.g., the
field office has reasonable access to
video teleconferencing. Because we are
offering claimants two new and
convenient ways to participate in a
personal conference—in addition to the
face-to-face conferences at our field
offices we currently offer—we believe
the need for our personnel to make
costly home visits will significantly
decrease. Therefore, we will consider
conducting face-to-face conferences at
locations other than SSA field offices
only on a case-by-case basis, and only

VerDate Aug<31>2005

15:28 Mar 02, 2007

Jkt 211001

in those limited circumstances where:
(a) A claimant has exhausted all other
means of obtaining a personal
conference, and (b) conducting a
personal conference by any other means
would be so inadequate, owing to a
claimant’s physical or mental condition,
as to infringe upon the person’s right to
a hearing. An example of such a
circumstance would be a claimant who
is bedridden and deaf, and therefore,
will have considerable difficulty
traveling to a field office and
participating in a conference by phone.
These proposed rules will not affect
the individual’s right to review the
claims file, have a representative
present for the proceedings, crossexamine witnesses, or submit
documentary evidence. Those
provisions will not change. For
example, claimants who choose to
conduct the personal conference via
telephone or video teleconference will
be given an opportunity to submit
documentary evidence by mail or fax
prior to the scheduled conference. If
necessary, the conference could be
rescheduled to allow claimants time to
do this. In conducting the personal
conference face-to-face at a place we
designate, or by telephone, or by video
teleconference, we will be fulfilling our
stewardship responsibilities while
offering an additional convenience to
the individual and continuing to protect
the individual’s right to present his or
her contention that he or she meets the
requirements for waiver of recovery of
an overpayment. The decisionmaker
will still be able to properly assess the
person’s contentions regarding fault
under these new procedures.
We already successfully conduct
some hearings by telephone and by
video teleconference. For example, the
administrative review of an initial
determination for Medicare Part D
subsidies is conducted either by a
telephone hearing or a case review. See
§ 418.3625. Additionally, some
administrative hearings to review claims
under title II (including administrative
law judge review of denial of waiver
based on a personal conference), and
other claims under title XVI are now
conducted via video teleconferencing.
See §§ 404.936 and 416.1436. Our
experience in these contexts has
demonstrated that these procedures
adequately protect a claimant’s due
process rights.
Explanation of Proposed Changes
We propose to change the regulations
in 20 CFR parts 404 and 416 to reflect
the methods for conducting personal
conferences when waiver of recovery of

PO 00000

Frm 00003

Fmt 4702

Sfmt 4702

an overpayment cannot be approved as
follows:
• We propose to change the
regulations at § 404.506 to reflect the
various methods we can use to conduct
the personal conference. These methods
are: face-to-face in a location we
designate (usually in the field office),
via telephone, or via video
teleconference.
• Currently, part 416 has no reference
to personal conferences when waiver of
recovery of the overpayment cannot be
approved. We are proposing to add a
new section that is similar to the
regulations at § 404.506. New § 416.557
would include the various methods we
can use to conduct the personal
conference and describe the individual’s
rights and responsibilities regarding the
personal conference.
Since SSR 94–4p only provides for a
pre-recoupment hearing that is
conducted face-to-face before waiver of
recovery of an overpayment can be
denied, the proposed changes in
§§ 404.506 and 416.557 would expand
that policy. Therefore, if we proceed to
publish final rules, we will also publish
a notice rescinding SSR 94–4p
concurrently with the effective date of
the final rules.
Clarity of These Proposed Rules
Executive Order 12866, as amended
by Executive Order 13258, requires each
agency to write all rules in plain
language. In addition to your
substantive comments on these
proposed rules, we invite your
comments on how to make these
proposed rules easier to understand. For
example:
• Have we organized the material to
suit your needs?
• Are the requirements in the rules
clearly stated?
• Do the rules contain technical
language or jargon that is not clear?
• Would a different format (grouping
and order of sections, use of headings,
paragraphing) make the rules easier to
understand?
• Would more (but shorter) sections
be better?
• Could we improve clarity by adding
tables, lists, or diagrams?
• What else could we do to make the
rules easier to understand?
Regulatory Procedures
Executive Order 12866
We have consulted with the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
determined that these proposed rules
meet the criteria for a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866, as amended by Executive Order

E:\FR\FM\05MRP1.SGM

05MRP1

9711

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 42 / Monday, March 5, 2007 / Proposed Rules
13258. Thus, they were reviewed by
OMB.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
We certify that these proposed rules
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities because they affect only
individuals. Thus, a regulatory
flexibility analysis as provided in the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, as amended,
is not required.
Paperwork Reduction Act
We are proposing to revise our rules
on conducting personal conferences

when waiver of recovery of a title II or
title XVI overpayment cannot be
approved. These proposed revisions
would allow for the conferences to be
conducted face-to-face, by telephone, or
by video teleconference. Currently, we
only conduct these conferences face-toface. Although these proposed rules
only contain information collection
burdens in §§ 416.557(c)(3) and
416.557(d)(8), we are also including the
associated information collection
burdens for §§ 404.506(e)(3) and
404.506(f)(8) since those sections deal
with personal conferences. As outlined
Annual
number of
respondents

Title/section & collection description

Personal Conference 404.506(e)(3) Submittal of additional documents for
consideration at personal conferences ........................................................
Personal Conference 404.506(f)(8) Submittal of additional mitigating financial information and verifications for consideration at personal conferences ........................................................................................................
Personal Conference 416.557(c)(3) Submittal of additional documents for
consideration at personal conferences ........................................................
Personal Conference 416.557(d)(8) Submittal of additional mitigating financial information and verifications for consideration at personal conferences ........................................................................................................

erjones on PRODPC74 with PROPOSALS

Total ..........................................................................................................

An Information Collection Request
has been submitted to OMB for
clearance. We are soliciting comments
on the burden estimate; the need for the
information; its practical utility; ways to
enhance its quality, utility and clarity;
and on ways to minimize the burden on
respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Comments should be sent to OMB by
fax or by e-mail to: Office of
Management and Budget, Attn: Desk
Officer for SSA, Fax Number: 202–395–
6974, E-mail address:
OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov.
Comments on the paperwork burdens
associated with this rule can be received
for up to 60 days after publication of
this notice and will be most useful if
received within 30 days of publication.
This does not affect the deadline for the
public to comment to SSA on the
proposed regulations. These information
collection requirements will not become
effective until approved by OMB. When
OMB has approved these information
collection requirements, SSA will
publish a notice in the Federal Register.
To receive a copy of the OMB
clearance package, your staff may call
the SSA Reports Clearance Officer on
410–965–0454.

VerDate Aug<31>2005

15:28 Mar 02, 2007

Jkt 211001

in the table below, in §§ 404.506(e)(3),
404.506(f)(8), 416.557(c)(3) and
416.557(d)(8), respondents may provide
additional evidence for consideration at
the personal conference. The collection
of evidence is a public paperwork
burden that requires clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
Respondents to these collections are
individual and the individual’s
representative that request a waiver
conference of their overpayment and
submit additional evidence.

Average
burden per
response
(minutes)

Frequency of
response

Estimated
annual burden
(hours)

150,000

1

30

75,000

75,000

1

30

37,500

100,000

1

30

50,000

50,000

1

30

25,000

375,000

........................

........................

187,500

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Nos. 96.001, Social SecurityDisability Insurance; 96.002, Social SecurityRetirement Insurance; 96.004, Social
Security-Survivors Insurance; and 96.006,
Supplemental Security Income)

List of Subjects
20 CFR Part 404
Administrative practice and
procedure, Blind, Disability benefits,
Old-Age, Survivors and Disability
Insurance; Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Social Security.

PART 404—FEDERAL OLD-AGE,
SURVIVORS AND DISABILITY
INSURANCE (1950— )
Subpart F—[Amended]
1. The authority citation for subpart F
of part 404 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 204, 205(a), 702(a)(5), and
1147 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
404, 405(a), 902(a)(5), and 1320b–17); 31
U.S.C. 3720A.

2. Section 404.506 is amended by
adding a sentence at the end of
paragraph (c) to read as follows:

20 CFR Part 416

§ 404.506 When waiver may be applied and
how to process the request.

Administrative practice and
procedure, Aged, Blind, Disability
benefits, Public assistance programs;
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Supplemental security
income (SSI).

*

Dated: November 27, 2006.
Jo Anne B. Barnhart,
Commissioner of Social Security.

For the reasons set out in the
preamble, we propose to amend subpart
F of part 404 and subpart E of part 416
of chapter III of title 20 of the Code of
Federal Regulations as follows:

PO 00000

Frm 00004

Fmt 4702

Sfmt 4702

*
*
*
*
(c) * * * We will offer to the
individual the option of conducting the
personal conference face-to-face at a
place we designate, by telephone, or by
video teleconference. The notice will
advise the individual of the date and
time of the personal conference.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 416–SUPPLEMENTAL
SECURITY INCOME FOR THE AGED,
BLIND, AND DISABLED
Subpart E—[Amended]
1. The authority citation for subpart E
of part 416 continues to read as follows:

E:\FR\FM\05MRP1.SGM

05MRP1

9712

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 42 / Monday, March 5, 2007 / Proposed Rules

Authority: Secs. 702(a)(5), 1147, 1601,
1602, 1611(c) and (e), and 1631(a)–(d) and (g)
of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
902(a)(5), 1320b–17, 1381, 1381a, 1382(c)
and (e), and 1383(a)–(d) and (g)); 31 U.S.C.
3720A.

2. Section 416.557 is added to read as
follows:

erjones on PRODPC74 with PROPOSALS

§ 416.557

Personal conference.

(a) If waiver cannot be approved (i.e.,
the requirements in § 416.550 (a) and (b)
are not met), the individual is notified
in writing and given the dates, times
and place of the file review and
personal conference; the procedure for
reviewing the claims file prior to the
personal conference; the procedure for
seeking a change in the scheduled dates,
times and/or place; and all other
information necessary to fully inform
the individual about the personal
conference. The file review is always
scheduled at least 5 days before the
personal conference. We will offer to the
individual the option of conducting the
personal conference face-to-face at a
place we designate, by telephone, or by
video teleconference. The notice will
advise the individual of the date and
time of the personal conference.
(b) At the file review, the individual
and the individual’s representative have
the right to review the claims file and
applicable law and regulations with the
decisionmaker or another of our
representatives who is prepared to
answer questions. We will provide
copies of material related to the
overpayment and/or waiver from the
claims file or pertinent sections of the
law or regulations that are requested by
the individual or the individual’s
representative.
(c) At the personal conference, the
individual is given the opportunity to:
(1) Appear personally, testify, crossexamine any witnesses, and make
arguments;
(2) Be represented by an attorney or
other representative (see § 416.1500),
although the individual must be present
at the conference; and
(3) Submit documents for
consideration by the decisionmaker.
(d) At the personal conference, the
decisionmaker:
(1) Tells the individual that the
decisionmaker was not previously
involved in the issue under review, that
the waiver decision is solely the
decisionmaker’s, and that the waiver
decision is based only on the evidence
or information presented or reviewed at
the conference;
(2) Ascertains the role and identity of
everyone present;
(3) Indicates whether or not the
individual reviewed the claims file;

VerDate Aug<31>2005

15:28 Mar 02, 2007

Jkt 211001

(4) Explains the provisions of law and
regulations applicable to the issue;
(5) Briefly summarizes the evidence
already in file which will be considered;
(6) Ascertains from the individual
whether the information presented is
correct and whether he/she fully
understands it;
(7) Allows the individual and the
individual’s representative, if any, to
present the individual’s case;
(8) Secures updated financial
information and verification, if
necessary;
(9) Allows each witness to present
information and allows the individual
and the individual’s representative to
question each witness;
(10) Ascertains whether there is any
further evidence to be presented;
(11) Reminds the individual of any
evidence promised by the individual
which has not been presented;
(12) Lets the individual and the
individual’s representative, if any,
present any proposed summary or
closing statement;
(13) Explains that a decision will be
made and the individual will be notified
in writing; and
(14) Explains repayment options and
further appeal rights in the event the
decision is adverse to the individual.
(e) SSA issues a written decision to
the individual (and his or her
representative, if any) specifying the
finding of fact and conclusions in
support of the decision to approve or
deny waiver and advising of the
individual’s right to appeal the decision.
If waiver is denied, adjustment or
recovery of the overpayment begins
even if the individual appeals.
(f) If it appears that the waiver cannot
be approved, and the individual
declines a personal conference or fails
to appear for a second scheduled
personal conference, a decision
regarding the waiver will be made based
on the written evidence of record.
Reconsideration is then the next step in
the appeals process.
[FR Doc. E7–3782 Filed 3–2–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4191–02–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 301
[REG–100841–97]
RIN 1545–AU97

Agreements for Payment of Tax
Liabilities in Installments
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.

AGENCY:

PO 00000

Frm 00005

Fmt 4702

Sfmt 4702

Withdrawal of notice of
proposed rulemaking and notice of
proposed rulemaking.

ACTION:

SUMMARY: This document withdraws the
notice of proposed rulemaking
published in the Federal Register on
December 31, 1997 (62 FR 68241) and
contains proposed regulations relating
to the payment of tax liabilities in
installments. The proposed regulations
reflect changes to the law made by the
Taxpayer Bill of Rights II, the Internal
Revenue Service Restructuring and
Reform Act of 1998, and the American
Jobs Creation Act of 2004.
DATES: Written or electronic comments
and requests for a public hearing must
be received by June 4, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to:
CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–100841–97), room
5203, Internal Revenue Service, POB
7604, Ben Franklin Station, Washington,
DC 20044. Submissions may be hand
delivered Monday through Friday
between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.
to: CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–100841–97),
Courier’s Desk, Internal Revenue
Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC. Alternatively,
taxpayers may submit comments
electronically directly to the IRS
Internet site at http://www.irs.gov/regs
or via the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
http://www.regulations.gov (indicate
IRS and REG–100841–97).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Concerning the regulations, G. William
Beard, (202) 622–3620; concerning
submissions of comments or requests for
a hearing, Kelly Banks, (202) 622–7180
(not toll-free numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background
On December 31, 1997, a notice of
proposed rulemaking (REG–100841–97;
62 FR 68241) reflecting changes made to
section 6159 of the Internal Revenue
Code (Code) by section 202 of the
Taxpayer Bill of Rights II, Pub. L. 104–
168 (110 Stat. 1452, 1457) was
published in the Federal Register. That
proposed rule was not acted upon prior
to the enactment of the Internal Revenue
Service Restructuring and Reform Act of
1998 (RRA 1998), Pub. L. 105–206,
section 3462 (112 Stat. 685, 764), which
made further amendments to section
6159. Section 843 of the American Jobs
Creation Act of 2004 (AJCA), Pub. L.
108–357 (118 Stat. 1418, 1600), also
made changes to section 6159. This
document amends the prior notice of
proposed rulemaking. It contains
proposed amendments to the Procedure
and Administration Regulations (26 CFR
part 301) under section 6159 reflecting

E:\FR\FM\05MRP1.SGM

05MRP1