Protocols for the Cross-Site Process Evaluation of the State Incentive Grant (SIG) Program

Forms and Documents

Document Name	Status

No forms / supporting documents in this ICR. Check IC Document Collections.

IC Document Collections

IC ID	Document Title	Status
7630	Protocols for the Cross-Site Process Evaluation of the State Incentive Grant (SIG) Program	Migrated

ICR Details

OMB Control No: 0930-0226	ICR Reference No: 200107-0930-004
Status: Historical Active	Previous ICR Reference No:
Agency/Subagency: HHS/SAMHSA	Agency Tracking No:
Title: Protocols for the Cross-Site Process Evaluation of the State Incentive Grant (SIG) Program
Type of Information Collection: New collection (Request for a new OMB Control Number)	Common Form ICR:  No
Type of Review Request: Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action: Approved without change	Conclusion Date: 07/31/2001
	Date Received in OIRA: 07/17/2001
Terms of Clearance: Approved consistent with answers to OMB/ONDCP questions dated 6/18, and followup memo dated 7/26. In addition to the changes agreed to in those memos, the following terms of clearance apply: -- The results of the case studies and any other data collected should be reported formally at least annually, in order to be utilized in policy decision making. -- Results of the study must be qualified in any report based on the problems associated with non-standardized data coolection. It should be clear that the evaluation is not necessarily comparing idential data across states, despite secondary attempts to standardize the state-collected data. -- As stated in the memo, prevention activities should not be used as a covariate. Analyses should not statistically "adjust for" the extent of prevention activities. -- State-level outcomes cannot be generalized to youths living outside of households, and community-level outcomes should not be generalized outside of students not attending public schools (students not in school or students attending private school). -- The request for copies of school survey data files prior to OMB approval was a violation of the PRA. SAMHSA shall insure that no such violations of the PRA occur in the future.

	Inventory as of this Action	Requested	Previously Approved
Expiration Date	07/31/2004	07/31/2004
Responses	313	0	0
Time Burden (Hours)	3,612	0	0
Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0

---

Abstract: The SIG program has funded 27 States and the District of Columbia to help prevent substance abuse among youths aged 12-17 years. At the State level, SIG-instigated systems change is expected to optimize the use of funding for substance abuse prevention from State and federal sources, and at the community level prevention gains in specific communities are to be expected as a result of the prevention interventions supported by the SIG program. This submission is for approval of four protocols to be used in the process componenet of the SIG cross-site evaluation. The outcome......

---

Authorizing Statute(s): None

Citations for New Statutory Requirements: None

---

Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:	Stage of Rulemaking:	Federal Register Citation:	Date:

---

Federal Register Notices & Comments

Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR? No

---

Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR: 1

IC Title	Form No.	Form Name
Protocols for the Cross-Site Process Evaluation of the State Incentive Grant (SIG) Program

---

ICR Summary of Burden

	Total Approved	Previously Approved	Change Due to New Statute	Change Due to Agency Discretion	Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate	Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses	313	0	0	313	0	0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)	3,612	0	0	3,612	0	0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0	0	0	0

Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: Yes

Burden Increase Due to:

Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Reduction Due to:

Short Statement:

---

Annual Cost to Federal Government: $0

Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods? Yes Part B of Supporting Statement

Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002? No

Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response? Uncollected

---

Common Form ICR:  No

---

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

(c) It reduces burden on small entities;

(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;

(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:

(i) Why the information is being collected;

(ii) Use of information;

(iii) Burden estimate;

(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);

(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and

(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.

(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and

(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.

Certification Date: 07/17/2001

---